Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271
Summary:
This patch uses the new `DynamicSize.cpp` to serve dynamic information.
Previously it was static and probably imprecise data.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69599
Summary:
This patch introduces a placeholder for representing the dynamic size of
regions. It also moves the `getExtent()` method of `SubRegions` to the
`MemRegionManager` as `getStaticSize()`.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69540
Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an
object of the respective type.
This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer
because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572
llvm-svn: 371450
Write tests for the actual crash that was found. Write comments and refactor
code around 17 style bugs and suppress 3 false positives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66847
llvm-svn: 370246
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
find clang/ -type f -exec sed -i 's/std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece>/PathDiagnosticPieceRef/g' {} \;
git diff -U3 --no-color HEAD^ | clang-format-diff-6.0 -p1 -i
Just as C++ is meant to be refactored, right?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65381
llvm-svn: 368717
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.
A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.
This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424
llvm-svn: 352277
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
It's an old bug that consists in stale references to symbols remaining in the
GDM if they disappear from other program state sections as a result of any
operation that isn't the actual dead symbol collection. The most common example
here is:
FILE *fp = fopen("myfile.txt", "w");
fp = 0; // leak of file descriptor
In this example the leak were not detected previously because the symbol
disappears from the public part of the program state due to evaluating
the assignment. For that reason the checker never receives a notification
that the symbol is dead, and never reports a leak.
This patch not only causes leak false negatives, but also a number of other
problems, including false positives on some checkers.
What's worse, even though the program state contains a finite number of symbols,
the set of symbols that dies is potentially infinite. This means that is
impossible to compute the set of all dead symbols to pass off to the checkers
for cleaning up their part of the GDM.
No longer compute the dead set at all. Disallow iterating over dead symbols.
Disallow querying if any symbols are dead. Remove the API for marking symbols
as dead, as it is no longer necessary. Update checkers accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18860
llvm-svn: 347953
In the current implementation, we run visitors until the fixed point is
reached.
That is, if a visitor adds another visitor, the currently processed path
is destroyed, all diagnostics is discarded, and it is regenerated again,
until it's no longer modified.
This pattern has a few negative implications:
- This loop does not even guarantee to terminate.
E.g. just imagine two visitors bouncing a diagnostics around.
- Performance-wise, e.g. for sqlite3 all visitors are being re-run at
least 10 times for some bugs.
We have already seen a few reports where it leads to timeouts.
- If we want to add more computationally intense visitors, this will
become worse.
- From architectural standpoint, the current layout requires copying
visitors, which is conceptually wrong, and can be annoying (e.g. no
unique_ptr on visitors allowed).
The proposed change is a much simpler architecture: the outer loop
processes nodes upwards, and whenever the visitor is added it only
processes current nodes and above, thus guaranteeing termination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47856
llvm-svn: 335666
We now check the type of the super-region pointer for most SubRegion classes
in compile time; some checks are run-time though.
This is an API-breaking change (we now require explicit casts to specific region
sub-classes), but in practice very few checkers are affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26838
llvm-svn: 300189
Correct two comments that do not match the current behavior of the checker.
A patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22670
llvm-svn: 277547
Summary:
This patch moves the MPIFunctionClassifier header to `clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers`,
in order to make it accessible in other parts of the architecture.
Reviewers: dcoughlin, zaks.anna
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22671
llvm-svn: 276639
This is a speculative attempt to fix the compiler error: "list initialization inside
member initializer list or non-static data member initializer is not implemented" with
r272529.
llvm-svn: 272530
This commit adds a static analysis checker to verify the correct usage of the MPI API in C
and C++. This version updates the reverted r271981 to fix a memory corruption found by the
ASan bots.
Three path-sensitive checks are included:
- Double nonblocking: Double request usage by nonblocking calls without intermediate wait
- Missing wait: Nonblocking call without matching wait.
- Unmatched wait: Waiting for a request that was never used by a nonblocking call
Examples of how to use the checker can be found at https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker
A patch by Alexander Droste!
Reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21081
llvm-svn: 272529
Second try at reapplying
"[analyzer] Add checker for correct usage of MPI API in C and C++."
Special thanks to Dan Liew for helping test the fix for the template
specialization compiler error with gcc.
The original patch is by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12761
llvm-svn: 271977
Reapply r271907 with a fix for the compiler error with gcc about specializing
clang::ento::ProgramStateTrait in a different namespace.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12761
llvm-svn: 271914
This commit adds a static analysis checker to check for the correct usage of the
MPI API in C and C++.
3 path-sensitive checks are included:
- Double nonblocking: Double request usage by nonblocking calls
without intermediate wait.
- Missing wait: Nonblocking call without matching wait.
- Unmatched wait: Waiting for a request that was never used by a
nonblocking call.
Examples of how to use the checker can be found
at https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker
Reviewers: zaks.anna
A patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12761
llvm-svn: 271907
Charusso