Redirect the copy ctor to the actual class instead of
overwriting it with `TypeID` based ctor.
This allows the final Pass classes to have extra fields and logic for their copy.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104302
Add a feature to `EnumAttr` definition to generate
specialized Attribute class for the particular enumeration.
This class will inherit `StringAttr` or `IntegerAttr` and
will override `classof` and `getValue` methods.
With this class the enumeration predicate can be checked with simple
RTTI calls (`isa`, `dyn_cast`) and it will return the typed enumeration
directly instead of raw string/integer.
Based on the following discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-add-enum-attribute-decorator-class/2252
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97836
This reverts commit 511dd4f438 along with
a couple fixes.
Original message:
Now the context is the first, rather than the last input.
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure and makes
it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96111
Now the context is the first, rather than the last input.
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure and makes
it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96111
Right now constraint/predicate traits/etc. use their "description" field as a one line human readable string. This breaks the current convention, by which a "description" may be multi-line. This revision renames the "description" field in these cases to "summary" which matches what the string is actually used as. This also unbreaks the use of TypeDefs(and eventually AttrDefs) in conjunction with existing type constraint facilities like `Optional`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94133
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure, is much simpler, and makes it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93432
This is part of a larger refactoring the better congregates the builtin structures under the BuiltinDialect. This also removes the problematic "standard" naming that clashes with the "standard" dialect, which is not defined within IR/. A temporary forward is placed in StandardTypes.h to allow time for downstream users to replaced references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92435
- Use TypeRange instead of ArrayRef<Type> where possible.
- Change some of the custom builders to also use TypeRange
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87944
Its handling is similar to optional attributes, except for the
getter method.
Reviewed By: rsuderman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87055
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
- Fix ODS framework to suppress build methods that infer result types and are
ambiguous with collective variants. This applies to operations with a single variadic
inputs whose result types can be inferred.
- Extended OpBuildGenTest to test these kinds of ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85060
- Initiate the unit test with a test that tests variants of build() methods
generated for ops with variadic operands and results.
- The intent is to migrate unit .td tests in mlir/test/mlir-tblgen that check for
generated C++ code to these unit tests which test both that the generated code
compiles and also is functionally correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84074
Using fully qualified names wherever possible avoids ambiguous class and function names. This is a follow-up to D82371.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82471
Summary:
In some cases, one may want to use different names for C++ symbol of an
enumerand from its string representation. In particular, in the LLVM dialect
for, e.g., Linkage, we would like to preserve the same enumerand names as LLVM
API and the same textual IR form as LLVM IR, yet the two are different
(CamelCase vs snake_case with additional limitations on not being a C++
keyword).
Modify EnumAttrCaseInfo in OpBase.td to include both the integer value and its
string representation. By default, this representation is the same as C++
symbol name. Introduce new IntStrAttrCaseBase that allows one to use different
names. Exercise it for LLVM Dialect Linkage attribute. Other attributes will
follow as separate changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73362
StrEq has some magic inside that should do the explicit conversion from
StringRef to std::string, but apparently this doesn't work with GCC 5.
Just use EXPECT_EQ, it does the same thing with less magic.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Previously we only check that each field is of the correct
mlir::Attribute subclass. This commit enhances to also consider
the attribute's types, by leveraging the constraints already
encoded in TableGen attribute definitions.
Reviewed By: rsuderman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72162
BitEnumAttr is a mechanism for modelling attributes whose value is
a bitfield. It should not be scoped to the SPIR-V dialect and can
be used by other dialects too.
This CL is mostly shuffling code around and adding tests and docs.
Functionality changes are:
* Fixed to use `getZExtValue()` instead of `getSExtValue()` when
getting the value from the underlying IntegerAttr for a case.
* Changed to auto-detect whether there is a case whose value is
all bits unset (i.e., zero). If so handle it specially in all
helper methods.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 277964926
Similar to enum, added a generator for structured data. This provide Dictionary that stores a fixed set of values and guarantees the values are valid. It is intended to store a fixed number of values by a given name.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 266437460
In ODS, right now we use StringAttrs to emulate enum attributes. It is
suboptimal if the op actually can and wants to store the enum as a
single integer value; we are paying extra cost on storing and comparing
the attribute value.
This CL introduces a new enum attribute subclass that are backed by
IntegerAttr. The downside with IntegerAttr-backed enum attributes is
that the assembly form now uses integer values, which is less obvious
than the StringAttr-backed ones. However, that can be remedied by
defining custom assembly form with the help of the conversion utility
functions generated via EnumsGen.
Choices are given to the dialect writers to decide which one to use for
their enum attributes.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255935542
Enum attributes can be defined using `EnumAttr`, which requires all its cases
to be defined with `EnumAttrCase`. To facilitate the interaction between
`EnumAttr`s and their C++ consumers, add a new EnumsGen TableGen backend
to generate a few common utilities, including an enum class, `llvm::DenseMapInfo`
for the enum class, conversion functions from/to strings.
This is controlled via the `-gen-enum-decls` and `-gen-enum-defs` command-line
options of `mlir-tblgen`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 252209623
Currently predicates are written with positional placeholders `{N}` and rely on
`formatv` as the engine to do substitution. The problem with this approach is that
the definitions of those positional placeholders are not consistent; they are
entirely up to the defining predicate of question. For example, `{0}` in various
attribute constraints is used to mean the attribute, while it is used to main the
builder for certain attribute transformations. This can become very confusing.
This CL introduces `tgfmt` as a new mechanism to better support for predicate and
rewrite rule specification. Instead of entirely relying on positional placeholders,
`tgfmt` support both positional and special placeholders. The former is used for
DAG operands. The latter, including $_builder, $_op, $_self, are used as special
"hooks" to entities in the context. With this, the predicate and rewrite rules
specification can be more consistent is more readable.
--
PiperOrigin-RevId: 243249671
Vladislav Vinogradov