LLVM's Value interface which is used in LLVM's DominatorTree analysis
and which changed in LLVM r198836.
The DominatorTree analysis is actually a generic graph analysis and
should be moved to LLVM's support library to clarify that Clang and
others are using it with arbitrary graphs. Further, it seems likely that
it should be using something other than printAsOperand, but this is
a simpler build fix. I'll clean this up later.
llvm-svn: 198840
operand into the Value interface just like the core print method is.
That gives a more conistent organization to the IR printing interfaces
-- they are all attached to the IR objects themselves. Also, update all
the users.
This removes the 'Writer.h' header which contained only a single function
declaration.
llvm-svn: 198836
"Open LLDB and run:
(lldb) script print lldb.debugger.GetInputFileHandle()
This puts the debugger into a catatonic state and all interactions seem
to enter a black hole. The reason is that executing this commnand
actually *CLOSES* the input file handle and so all input is dropped on
the floor. Oof!
The fix is simple: flush a descriptor, instead of closing it, when
transferring ownership."
llvm-svn: 198835
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The
most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the
fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest
for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
In the stackmap format we advertise the constant field as signed.
However, we were determining whether to promote to a 64-bit constant
pool based on an unsigned comparison.
This fix allows -1 to be encoded as a small constant.
llvm-svn: 198816
It's not worth keeping two copies of the identifier init and comparison code
just to save a pointer coparison.
This should reduce further once we get proper contextual keywords in the token
stream, so having the identifier checks in one place is a step towards that.
Cleanup only.
llvm-svn: 198814
210: test_with_dsym_and_run_command (Test-rdar-10642615.Radar10642615DataFormatterTestCase)
Test data formatter commands. ... Assertion failed: (isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 239.
226: test_with_dsym_and_run_command (Test-rdar-13338477.Radar13338477DataFormatterTestCase)
Test that LLDB handles the clang typeclass Paren correctly. ... Assertion failed: (isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 239.
llvm-svn: 198811
it is causing an llvm assert when run against
test/functionalities/data-formatter/rdar-10642615,
Assertion failed: (isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 239.
llvm-svn: 198809
Summary:
Moved implementation of classes declared in
ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer.h to ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer.cpp.
Added a FIXME note in ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer::HandleDiagnostic.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2520
llvm-svn: 198807
This makes it easier to write a test that's mostly shared between
fission and non-fission (using FileCheck's multiple prefix support).
llvm-svn: 198806
MIsNeedChainEdge, which is used by -enable-aa-sched-mi (AA in misched), had an
llvm_unreachable when -enable-aa-sched-mi is enabled and we reach an
instruction with multiple MMOs. Instead, return a conservative answer. This
allows testing -enable-aa-sched-mi on x86.
Also, this moves the check above the isUnsafeMemoryObject checks.
isUnsafeMemoryObject is currently correct only for instructions with one MMO
(as noted in the comment in isUnsafeMemoryObject):
// We purposefully do no check for hasOneMemOperand() here
// in hope to trigger an assert downstream in order to
// finish implementation.
The problem with this is that, had the candidate edge passed the
"!MIa->mayStore() && !MIb->mayStore()" check, the hoped-for assert would never
happen (which could, in theory, lead to incorrect behavior if one of these
secondary MMOs was volatile, for example).
llvm-svn: 198795