This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Summary: Moving LiveRangeShrink to x86 as this pass is mostly useful for archtectures with great register pressure.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: jholewinski, jyknight, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33294
llvm-svn: 303292
Follow up to D33147
NVPTXTargetLowering::LowerCall was trusting the default argument values.
Fixes another 17 of the NVPTX '-verify-machineinstrs with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS' errors in PR32146.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33189
llvm-svn: 303082
This fixes 47 of the 75 NVPTX '-verify-machineinstrs with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS' errors in PR32146.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33147
llvm-svn: 302942
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
PR31088 demonstrated that we were assuming that only integers require promotion from <1 x iX> types, when in fact float types may require it as well - in this case half floats.
This patch adds support for extension/truncation for both integer and float types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32391
llvm-svn: 301910
Don't scalarize VSELECT->SETCC when operands/results needs to be widened,
or when the type of the SETCC operands are different from those of the VSELECT.
(VSELECT SETCC) and (VSELECT (AND/OR/XOR (SETCC,SETCC))) are handled.
The previous splitting of VSELECT->SETCC in DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT() is
no longer needed and has been removed.
Updated tests:
test/CodeGen/ARM/vuzp.ll
test/CodeGen/NVPTX/f16x2-instructions.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-19-widen_vselect.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-21-widen-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/psubus.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/vselect-pcmp.ll
Review: Eli Friedman, Simon Pilgrim
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29489
llvm-svn: 297930
Summary:
Currently, when 't1: i1 = setcc t2, t3, cc' followed by 't4: i1 = xor t1, Constant:i1<-1>' is folded into 't5: i1 = setcc t2, t3 !cc', SDLoc of newly created SDValue 't5' follows SDLoc of 't4', not 't1'. However, as the opcode of newly created SDValue is 'setcc', it make more sense to take DebugLoc from 't1' than 't4'. For the code below
```
extern int bar();
extern int baz();
int foo(int x, int y) {
if (x != y)
return bar();
else
return baz();
}
```
, following is the bitcode representation of 'foo' at the end of llvm-ir level optimization:
```
define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !4 {
entry:
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !9, metadata !11), !dbg !12
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %y, i64 0, metadata !10, metadata !11), !dbg !13
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %x, %y, !dbg !14
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else, !dbg !16
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = tail call i32 (...) @bar() #3, !dbg !17
br label %return, !dbg !18
if.else: ; preds = %entry
%call1 = tail call i32 (...) @baz() #3, !dbg !19
br label %return, !dbg !20
return: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
%retval.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call1, %if.else ]
ret i32 %retval.0, !dbg !21
}
!14 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !15)
!16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 7, scope: !4)
```
As you can see, in 'entry' block, 'icmp' instruction and 'br' instruction have different debug locations. However, with current implementation, there's no distinction between debug locations of these two when they are lowered to asm instructions. This is because 'icmp' and 'br' become 'setcc' 'xor' and 'brcond' in SelectionDAG, where SDLoc of 'setcc' follows the debug location of 'icmp' but SDLOC of 'xor' and 'brcond' follows the debug location of 'br' instruction, and SDLoc of 'xor' overwrites SDLoc of 'setcc' when they are folded. This patch addresses this issue.
Reviewers: atrick, bogner, andreadb, craig.topper, aprantl
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: jlebar, mkuper, jholewinski, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29813
llvm-svn: 296825
The motivation for filling out these select-of-constants cases goes back to D24480,
where we discussed removing an IR fold from add(zext) --> select. And that goes back to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL75531https://reviews.llvm.org/rL159230
The idea is that we should always canonicalize patterns like this to a select-of-constants
in IR because that's the smallest IR and the best for value tracking. Note that we currently
do the opposite in some cases (like the cases in *this* patch). Ie, the proposed folds in
this patch already exist in InstCombine today:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp#L1151
As this patch shows, most targets generate better machine code for simple ext/add/not ops
rather than a select of constants. So the follow-up steps to make this less of a patchwork
of special-case folds and missing IR canonicalization:
1. Have DAGCombiner convert any select of constants into ext/add/not ops.
2 Have InstCombine canonicalize in the other direction (create more selects).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30180
llvm-svn: 296137
This patch enables support for .f16x2 operations.
Added new register type Float16x2.
Added support for .f16x2 instructions.
Added handling of vectorized loads/stores of v2f16 values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30057
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30310
llvm-svn: 296032
Original code only used vector loads/stores for explicit vector arguments.
It could also do more loads/stores than necessary (e.g v5f32 would
touch 8 f32 values). Aggregate types were loaded one element at a time,
even the vectors contained within.
This change attempts to generalize (and simplify) parameter space
loads/stores so that vector loads/stores can be used more broadly.
Functionality of the patch has been verified by compiling thrust
test suite and manually checking the differences between PTX
generated by llvm with and without the patch.
General algorithm:
* ComputePTXValueVTs() flattens input/output argument into a flat list
of scalars to load/store and returns their types and offsets.
* VectorizePTXValueVTs() uses that data to create vectorization plan
which returns an array of flags marking boundaries of vectorized
load/stores. Scalars are represented as 1-element vectors.
* Code that generates loads/stores implements a simple state machine
that constructs a vector according to the plan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30011
llvm-svn: 295784
x*rsqrt(x) returns NaN for x == 0, whereas 1/rsqrt(x) returns 0, as
desired.
Verified that the particular nvptx approximate instructions here do in
fact return 0 for x = 0.
llvm-svn: 293713
Summary:
The affected transforms all implicitly use associativity of addition,
for which we usually require unsafe math to be enabled.
The "Aggressive" flag is only meant to convey information about the
performance of the fused ops relative to a fmul+fadd sequence.
Fixes Bug 31626.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, mehdi_amini, arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, nemanjai, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28675
llvm-svn: 293635
Summary:
This lets us lower to sqrt.approx and rsqrt.approx under more
circumstances.
* Now we emit sqrt.approx and rsqrt.approx for calls to @llvm.sqrt.f32,
when fast-math is enabled. Previously, we only would emit it for
calls to @llvm.nvvm.sqrt.f. (With this patch we no longer emit
sqrt.approx for calls to @llvm.nvvm.sqrt.f; we rely on intcombine to
simplify llvm.nvvm.sqrt.f into llvm.sqrt.f32.)
* Now we emit the ftz version of rsqrt.approx when ftz is enabled.
Previously, we only emitted rsqrt.approx when ftz was disabled.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tra, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28508
llvm-svn: 293605
Support for barrier synchronization between a subset of threads
in a CTA through one of sixteen explicitly specified barriers.
These intrinsics are not directly exposed in CUDA but are
critical for forthcoming support of OpenMP on NVPTX GPUs.
The intrinsics allow the synchronization of an arbitrary
(multiple of 32) number of threads in a CTA at one of 16
distinct barriers. The two intrinsics added are as follows:
call void @llvm.nvvm.barrier.n(i32 10)
waits for all threads in a CTA to arrive at named barrier #10.
call void @llvm.nvvm.barrier(i32 15, i32 992)
waits for 992 threads in a CTA to arrive at barrier #15.
Detailed description of these intrinsics are available in the PTX manual.
http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/parallel-thread-execution/#parallel-synchronization-and-communication-instructions
Reviewers: hfinkel, jlebar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17657
llvm-svn: 293384
There's no neg.f16 instruction, so negation has to
be done via subtraction from zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28876
llvm-svn: 292452
Summary:
This change also lets us use max.{s,u}16. There's a vague warning in a
test about this maybe being less efficient, but I could not come up with
a case where the resulting SASS (sm_35 or sm_60) was different with or
without max.{s,u}16. It's true that nvcc seems to emit only
max.{s,u}32, but even ptxas 7.0 seems to have no problem generating
efficient SASS from max.{s,u}16 (the casts up to i32 and back down to
i16 seem to be implicit and nops, happening via register aliasing).
In the absence of evidence, better to have fewer special cases, emit
more straightforward code, etc. In particular, if a new GPU has 16-bit
min/max instructions, we want to be able to use them.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28732
llvm-svn: 292304
Summary: Previously we lowered it literally, to shifts and xors.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28722
llvm-svn: 292303
Summary:
Avoid an unnecessary conversion operation when using the result of
ctpop.i32 or ctpop.i16 as an i32, as in both cases the ptx instruction
we run returns an i32.
(Previously if we used the value as an i32, we'd do an unnecessary
zext+trunc.)
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28721
llvm-svn: 292302
Summary:
* Disable "ctlz speculation", which inserts a branch on every ctlz(x) which
has defined behavior on x == 0 to check whether x is, in fact zero.
* Add DAG patterns that avoid re-truncating or re-expanding the result
of the 16- and 64-bit ctz instructions.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28719
llvm-svn: 292299
Summary:
Previously there were three ways to inform the NVVMReflect pass whether
you wanted to flush denormals to zero:
* An LLVM command-line option
* Parameters to the NVVMReflect constructor
* Metadata on the module itself.
This change removes the first two, leaving only the third.
The motivation for this change, aside from simplifying things, is that
we want LLVM to be aware of whether it's operating in FTZ mode, so other
passes can use this information. Ideally we'd have a target-generic
piece of metadata on the module. This change moves us in that
direction.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28700
llvm-svn: 292068
Only scalar half-precision operations are supported at the moment.
- Adds general support for 'half' type in NVPTX.
- fp16 math operations are supported on sm_53+ GPUs only
(can be disabled with --nvptx-no-f16-math).
- Type conversions to/from fp16 are supported on all GPU variants.
- On GPU variants that do not have full fp16 support (or if it's disabled),
fp16 operations are promoted to fp32 and results are converted back
to fp16 for storage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28540
llvm-svn: 291956
Previously we'd always lower @llvm.{sin,cos}.f32 to {sin.cos}.approx.f32
instruction even when unsafe FP math was not allowed.
Clang-generated IR is not affected by this as it uses precise sin/cos
from CUDA's libdevice when unsafe math is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28619
llvm-svn: 291936
Summary:
Previously if you had
* a function with the fast-math-enabled attr, followed by
* a function without the fast-math attr,
the second function would inherit the first function's fast-math-ness.
This means that mixing fast-math and non-fast-math functions in a module
was completely broken unless you explicitly annotated every
non-fast-math function with "unsafe-fp-math"="false". This appears to
have been broken since r176986 (March 2013), when the resetTargetOptions
function was introduced.
This patch tests the correct behavior as best we can. I don't think I
can test FPDenormalMode and NoTrappingFPMath, because they aren't used
in any backends during function lowering. Surprisingly, I also can't
find any uses at all of LessPreciseFPMAD affecting generated code.
The NVPTX/fast-math.ll test changes are an expected result of fixing
this bug. When FMA is disabled, we emit add as "add.rn.f32", which
prevents fma combining. Before this patch, fast-math was enabled in all
functions following the one which explicitly enabled it on itself, so we
were emitting plain "add.f32" where we should have generated
"add.rn.f32".
Reviewers: mkuper
Subscribers: hfinkel, majnemer, jholewinski, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28507
llvm-svn: 291618
We used the logBase2 of the high instead of the ceilLogBase2 resulting
in the wrong result for certain values. For example, it resulted in an
i1 AssertZExt when the exclusive portion of the range was 3.
llvm-svn: 291196
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 290153
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
llvm-svn: 289982
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289920
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289902
Summary:
This has been replaced by the NVPTXInferAddressSpaces pass. We've had
the new one as the default with the old one accessible via a flag for
some months now, and we've had no problems.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, jingyue, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26165
llvm-svn: 285642
Hans Wennborg