This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
llvm-svn: 177239
Rules include:
1)1 x*y +/- x*z => x*(y +/- z)
(the order of operands dosen't matter)
2) y/x +/- z/x => (y +/- z)/x
The transformation is disabled if the new add/sub expr "y +/- z" is a
denormal/naz/inifinity.
rdar://12911472
llvm-svn: 177088
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.
llvm-svn: 176913
These cases were found by further work to remove support for debug info
versioning. Common cleanups (other than changing the version info in the tag
field) included adding the last parameter to compile_units (recently added for
fission support) and other cases of trailing fields in lexical blocks, compile
units, and subprograms.
llvm-svn: 176834
When considering folding a bitcast of an alloca into the alloca itself,
make sure we don't shrink the amount of memory being allocated, or
things rapidly go sideways.
rdar://13324424
llvm-svn: 176547
This adds minimalistic support for PHI nodes to llvm.objectsize() evaluation
fingers crossed so that it does break clang boostrap again..
llvm-svn: 176408
The instcombine recognized pattern looks like:
a = b * c
d = a +/- Cst
or
a = b * c
d = Cst +/- a
When creating the new operands for fadd or fsub instruction following the related fmul, the first operand was created with the second original operand (M0 was created with C1) and the second with the first (M1 with Opnd0).
The fix consists in creating the new operands with the appropriate original operand, i.e., M0 with Opnd0 and M1 with C1.
llvm-svn: 176300
Listing all of the attributes for the callee of a call/invoke instruction is way
too much and makes the IR unreadable. Use references to attributes instead.
llvm-svn: 175877
(or (bool?A:B),(bool?C:D)) --> (bool?(or A,C):(or B,D))
By the time the OR is visited, both the SELECTs have been visited and not
optimized and the OR itself hasn't been transformed so we do this transform in
the hopes that the new ORs will be optimized.
The transform is explicitly disabled for vector-selects until "codegen matures
to handle them better".
Patch by Muhammad Tauqir!
llvm-svn: 175380
It enables to work with a smaller constant, which is target friendly for those which can compare to immediates.
It also avoids inserting a shift in favor of a trunc, which can be free on some targets.
This used to work until LLVM-3.1, but regressed with the 3.2 release.
llvm-svn: 175270
We use constant folding to see if an intrinsic evaluates to the same value as a
constant that we know. If we don't take the undefinedness into account we get a
value that doesn't match the actual implementation, and miscompiled code.
This was uncovered by Chandler's simplifycfg changes.
llvm-svn: 173356
Okay, here's how to reproduce the problem:
1) Build a Release (or Release+Asserts) version of clang in the normal way.
2) Using the clang & clang++ binaries from (1), build a Release (or
Release+Asserts) version of the same sources, but this time enable LTO ---
specify the `-flto' flag on the command line.
3) Run the ARC migrator tests:
$ arcmt-test --args -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -x objective-c++ ./src/tools/clang/test/ARCMT/cxx-rewrite.mm
You'll see that the output isn't correct (the whitespace is off).
The mis-compile is in the function `RewriteBuffer::RemoveText' in the
clang/lib/Rewrite/Core/Rewriter.cpp file. When that function and RewriteRope.cpp
are compiled with LTO and the `arcmt-test' executable is regenerated, you'll see
the error. When those files are not LTO'ed, then the output of the `arcmt-test'
is fine.
It is *really* hard to get a testcase out of this. I'll file a PR with what I
have currently.
--- Reverse-merging r172363 into '.':
U include/llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h
U lib/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp
--- Reverse-merging r171325 into '.':
U test/Transforms/InstCombine/objsize.ll
G include/llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h
G lib/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp
llvm-svn: 172756
some optimization opportunities (in the enclosing supper-expressions).
rule 1. (-0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "-0.0 - X" has only one reference.
rule 2. (0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "0.0 - X" has only one reference, and
the instruction is marked "noSignedZero".
2. Eliminate negation (The compiler was already able to handle these
opt if the 0.0s are replaced with -0.0.)
rule 3: (0.0 - X) * (0.0 - Y) => X * Y
rule 4: (0.0 - X) * C => X * -C
if the expr is flagged "noSignedZero".
3.
Rule 5: (X*Y) * X => (X*X) * Y
if X!=Y and the expression is flagged with "UnsafeAlgebra".
The purpose of this transformation is two-fold:
a) to form a power expression (of X).
b) potentially shorten the critical path: After transformation, the
latency of the instruction Y is amortized by the expression of X*X,
and therefore Y is in a "less critical" position compared to what it
was before the transformation.
4. Remove the InstCombine code about simplifiying "X * select".
The reasons are following:
a) The "select" is somewhat architecture-dependent, therefore the
higher level optimizers are not able to precisely predict if
the simplification really yields any performance improvement
or not.
b) The "select" operator is bit complicate, and tends to obscure
optimization opportunities. It is btter to keep it as low as
possible in expr tree, and let CodeGen to tackle the optimization.
llvm-svn: 172551
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C_A: reassociation is allowed
C_R: reciprocal of a constant C is appropriate, which means
- 1/C is exact, or
- reciprocal is allowed and 1/C is neither a special value nor a denormal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
rule1: (X/C1) / C2 => X / (C2*C1) (if C_A)
=> X * (1/(C2*C1)) (if C_A && C_R)
rule 2: X*C1 / C2 => X * (C1/C2) if C_A
rule 3: (X/Y)/Z = > X/(Y*Z) (if C_A && at least one of Y and Z is symbolic value)
rule 4: Z/(X/Y) = > (Z*Y)/X (similar to rule3)
rule 5: C1/(X*C2) => (C1/C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 6: C1/(X/C2) => (C1*C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 7: C1/(C2/X) => (C1/C2) * X (if C_A)
llvm-svn: 172488
o. X/C1 * C2 => X * (C2/C1) (if C2/C1 is neither special FP nor denormal)
o. X/C1 * C2 -> X/(C1/C2) (if C2/C1 is either specical FP or denormal, but C1/C2 is a normal Fp)
Let MDC denote multiplication or dividion with one & only one operand being a constant
o. (MDC ± C1) * C2 => (MDC * C2) ± (C1 * C2)
(so long as the constant-folding doesn't yield any denormal or special value)
llvm-svn: 171793
turning a code like this:
if (foo)
free(foo)
into that:
free(foo)
Move a call to free from basic block FB into FB's predecessor, P,
when the path from P to FB is taken only if the argument of free is
not equal to NULL.
Some restrictions apply on P and FB to be sure that this code motion
is profitable. Namely:
1. FB must have only one predecessor P.
2. FB must contain only the call to free plus an unconditional
branch to S.
3. P's successors are FB and S.
Because of 1., we will not increase the code size when moving the call
to free from FB to P.
Because of 2., FB will be empty after the move.
Because of 2. and 3., P's branch instruction becomes useless, so as FB
(simplifycfg will do the job).
llvm-svn: 171762
When the least bit of C is greater than V, (x&C) must be greater than V
if it is not zero, so the comparison can be simplified.
Although this was suggested in Target/X86/README.txt, it benefits any
architecture with a directly testable form of AND.
Patch by Kevin Schoedel
llvm-svn: 170576
David Blaikie