Based on an IR equivalent of target lowering's generic expansion - target specific costs will typically be lower (IR doesn't have a good mull/mulh equivalent) but we need a baseline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57925
llvm-svn: 354774
Avoid ADD/SUB instruction duplication by reusing the X86ISD::ADD/SUB results.
Includes ADD commutation - I tried to include NEG+SUB SUB commutation as well but this causes regressions as we don't have good combine coverage to simplify X86ISD::SUB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58597
llvm-svn: 354771
Recently, support was added to yaml2obj to allow dynamic sections to
have a list of entries, to make it easier to write tests with dynamic
sections. However, this change also removed the ability to provide
custom contents to the dynamic section, making it hard to test
malformed contents (e.g. because the section is not a valid size to
contain an array of entries). This change reinstates this. An error is
emitted if raw content and dynamic entries are both specified.
Reviewed by: grimar, ruiu
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58543
llvm-svn: 354770
The linux kernel uses an old flag -p/-no-pipeline-knowledge that is
accepted by bfd and gold but ignored by modern versions of them. The
original option is very old and is pre-ABI, it sometimes comes up in
code-bases that had support for pre ABI toolchains. The Linux kernel uses
it in 3 places in the ARM specific section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58540
llvm-svn: 354769
More or less all the instructions defined in the v8.2a full-fp16
extension are defined as UNPREDICTABLE if you put them in an IT block
(Thumb) or use with any condition other than AL (ARM). LLVM didn't
know that, and was happy to conditionalise them.
In order to force these instructions to count as not predicable, I had
to make a small Tablegen change. The code generation back end mostly
decides if an instruction was predicable by looking for something it
can identify as a predicate operand; there's an isPredicable bit flag
that overrides that check in the positive direction, but nothing that
overrides it in the negative direction.
(I considered the alternative approach of actually removing the
predicate operand from those instructions, but thought that it would
be more painful overall for instructions differing only in data type
to have different shapes of operand list. This way, the only code that
has to notice the difference is the if-converter.)
So I've added an isUnpredicable bit alongside isPredicable, and set
that bit on the right subset of FP16 instructions, and also on the
VSEL, VMAXNM/VMINNM and VRINT[ANPM] families which should be
unpredicable for all data types.
I've included a couple of representative regression tests, both of
which previously caused an fp16 instruction to be conditionalised in
ARM state and (with -arm-no-restrict-it) to be put in an IT block in
Thumb.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: jdoerfert, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57823
llvm-svn: 354768
Summary:
This reverts D50129 / rL338834: [XRay][tools] Use Support/JSON.h in llvm-xray convert
Abstractions are great.
Readable code is great.
JSON support library is a *good* idea.
However unfortunately, there is an internal detail that one needs
to be aware of in `llvm::json::Object` - it uses `llvm::DenseMap`.
So for **every** `llvm::json::Object`, even if you only store a single `int`
entry there, you pay the whole price of `llvm::DenseMap`.
Unfortunately, it matters for `llvm-xray`.
I was trying to analyse the `llvm-exegesis` analysis mode performance,
and for that i wanted to view the LLVM X-Ray log visualization in Chrome
trace viewer. And the `llvm-xray convert` is sluggish, and sometimes
even ended up being killed by OOM.
`xray-log.llvm-exegesis.lwZ0sT` was acquired from `llvm-exegesis`
(compiled with ` -fxray-instruction-threshold=128`)
analysis mode over `-benchmarks-file` with 10099 points (one full
latency measurement set), with normal runtime of 0.387s.
Timings:
Old: (copied from D58580)
```
$ perf stat -r 5 ./bin/llvm-xray convert -sort -symbolize -instr_map=./bin/llvm-exegesis -output-format=trace_event -output=/tmp/trace.yml xray-log.llvm-exegesis.lwZ0sT
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-xray convert -sort -symbolize -instr_map=./bin/llvm-exegesis -output-format=trace_event -output=/tmp/trace.yml xray-log.llvm-exegesis.lwZ0sT' (5 runs):
21346.24 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.28% )
314 context-switches # 14.701 M/sec ( +- 59.13% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.037 M/sec ( +-100.00% )
2181354 page-faults # 102191.251 M/sec ( +- 0.02% )
85477442102 cycles # 4004415.019 GHz ( +- 0.28% ) (83.33%)
14526427066 stalled-cycles-frontend # 16.99% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.70% ) (83.33%)
32371533721 stalled-cycles-backend # 37.87% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.27% ) (33.34%)
67896890228 instructions # 0.79 insn per cycle
# 0.48 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.03% ) (50.00%)
14592654840 branches # 683631198.653 M/sec ( +- 0.02% ) (66.67%)
212207534 branch-misses # 1.45% of all branches ( +- 0.94% ) (83.34%)
21.3502 +- 0.0585 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.27% )
```
New:
```
$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-xray convert -sort -symbolize -instr_map=./bin/llvm-exegesis -output-format=trace_event -output=/tmp/trace.yml xray-log.llvm-exegesis.lwZ0sT
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-xray convert -sort -symbolize -instr_map=./bin/llvm-exegesis -output-format=trace_event -output=/tmp/trace.yml xray-log.llvm-exegesis.lwZ0sT' (9 runs):
7178.38 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.26% )
182 context-switches # 25.402 M/sec ( +- 28.84% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.046 M/sec ( +- 70.71% )
33701 page-faults # 4694.994 M/sec ( +- 0.88% )
28761053971 cycles # 4006833.933 GHz ( +- 0.26% ) (83.32%)
2028297997 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.05% frontend cycles idle ( +- 1.61% ) (83.32%)
10773154901 stalled-cycles-backend # 37.46% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.38% ) (33.36%)
36199132874 instructions # 1.26 insn per cycle
# 0.30 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.03% ) (50.02%)
6434504227 branches # 896420204.421 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%)
73355176 branch-misses # 1.14% of all branches ( +- 1.46% ) (83.33%)
7.1807 +- 0.0190 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.26% )
```
So using `llvm::json` nearly triples run-time on that test case.
(+3x is times, not percent.)
Memory:
Old:
```
total runtime: 39.88s.
bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 79.07GB (1.98GB/s)
calls to allocation functions: 33267816 (834135/s)
temporary memory allocations: 5832298 (146235/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 9.21GB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 147.98GB
total memory leaked: 1.09MB
```
New:
```
total runtime: 17.42s.
bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 5.12GB (293.86MB/s)
calls to allocation functions: 21382982 (1227284/s)
temporary memory allocations: 232858 (13364/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 350.69MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 2.55GB
total memory leaked: 79.95KB
```
Diff:
```
total runtime: -22.46s.
bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): -73.95GB (3.29GB/s)
calls to allocation functions: -11884834 (529155/s)
temporary memory allocations: -5599440 (249307/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -8.86GB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: -1.01MB
```
So using `llvm::json` increases *peak* memory consumption on *this* testcase ~+27x.
And total allocation count +15x. Both of these numbers are times, *not* percent.
And note that memory usage is clearly unbound with `llvm::json`, it directly depends
on the length of the log, so peak memory consumption is always increasing.
This isn't so with the dumb code, there is no accumulating memory consumption,
peak memory consumption is fixed. Naturally, that means it will handle *much*
larger logs without OOM'ing.
Readability is good, but the price is simply unacceptable here.
Too bad none of this analysis was done as part of the development/review D50129 itself.
Reviewers: dberris, kpw, sammccall
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: riccibruno, hans, courbet, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58584
llvm-svn: 354764
OPC_CheckCondCode is always used as operand 2 of a setcc. And its always surrounded by a MoveChild2 and a MoveParent. By having a dedicated opcode for this case we can reduce the number of bytes needed for this pattern from 4 bytes to 2.
This saves ~3000 bytes in the X86 table.
llvm-svn: 354763
Summary:
Fast selection of llvm fptoi & fptrunc instructions is not handled well about
VSX instruction support.
We'd use VSX float convert integer instruction instead of non-vsx float convert
integer instruction if the operand register class is VSSRC or VSFRC because i32
and i64 are mapped to VSSRC and VSFRC correspondingly if VSX feature is
openeded.
For float trunc instruction, we do this silimar work like float convert integer
instruction to try to use VSX instruction.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58430
llvm-svn: 354762
And regenerate checks. I had to rename some variables, because
update_test_checks can't deal with the same variable names used
in lower and upper case. I've also dropped the result type aliases,
as just using the type directly gives a cleaner result.
llvm-svn: 354759
Its proving tricky to combine shuffles across multiple vector sizes, so for now I'm adding this more specific combine - the pattern is common enough to be worth it as a first step.
llvm-svn: 354757
Summary:
Previously we used BLENDPS/BLENDPD but that puts the blend in the FP domain. Under optsize, the two address instruction pass can cause blendps/blendpd to commute to blendps/blendpd. But we probably shouldn't do that if the original type was a integer. So use pblendw instead.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58574
llvm-svn: 354755
Summary:
The AX/EAX/RAX with immediate forms are 2 uops just like the AL with immediate.
The modrm form with r8 and immediate is a single uop just like r16/r32/r64 with immediate.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58581
llvm-svn: 354754
Summary:
When promoting the over flow vector for these ops we should use the target's desired setcc result type. This way a v8i32 result type will use a v8i32 overflow vector instead of a v8i16 overflow vector. A v8i16 overflow vector will cause LegalizeDAG/LegalizeVectorOps to have to use v8i32 and truncate to v8i16 in its expansion. By doing this in type legalization instead, we get the truncate into the DAG earlier and give DAG combine more of a chance to optimize it.
We also have to fix unrolling to use the scalar setcc result type for the scalarized operation, and convert it to the required vector element type after the scalar operation. We have to observe the vector boolean contents when doing this conversion. The previous code was just taking the scalar result and putting it in the vector. But for X86 and AArch64 that would have only put a the boolean value in bit 0 of the element and left all other bits in the element 0. We need to ensure all bits in the element are the same. I'm using a select with constants here because that's what setcc unrolling in LegalizeVectorOps used.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58567
llvm-svn: 354753
add A, sext(B) --> sub A, zext(B)
We have to choose 1 of these forms, so I'm opting for the
zext because that's easier for value tracking.
The backend should be prepared for this change after:
D57401
rL353433
This is also a preliminary step towards reducing the amount
of bit hackery that we do in IR to optimize icmp/select.
That should be waiting to happen at a later optimization stage.
The seeming regression in the fuzzer test was discussed in:
D58359
We were only managing that fold in instcombine by luck, and
other passes should be able to deal with that better anyway.
llvm-svn: 354748
There's likely a missed IR canonicalization for at least 1 of these
patterns. Otherwise, we wouldn't have needed the pattern-matching
enhancement in D57516.
Note that -- unlike usubo added with D57789 -- the TLI hook for
this transform defaults to 'on'. So if there's any perf fallout
from this, targets should look at how they're lowering the uaddo
node in SDAG and/or override that hook.
The x86 diffs suggest that there's some missing pattern-matching
for forming inc/dec.
This should fix the remaining known problems in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40486https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
llvm-svn: 354746
As requested during review of D57601, be equally conservative for atomic MMOs as for volatile MMOs in all in tree backends. At the moment, all atomic MMOs are also volatile, but I'm about to change that.
Reviewed as part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D58490, with other backends still pending review.
llvm-svn: 354740
Thread Twine a little deeper through the VFS to avoid unnecessarily
constructing the same std::string twice in a parameter sequence:
Twine -> std::string -> StringRef -> std::string
Changing a few parameters from StringRef to Twine avoids the early call
to `Twine::str()`.
llvm-svn: 354739
The new instruciton might have less operands than the original instruction. If we don't resample, the next loop iteration might read an operand that doesn't exist.
X86 can commute blends to movss/movsd which reduces from 4 operands to 3. This happened in the test case that caused r354363 & company to be reverted. A reduced version of that has been committed here.
Really this whole checking for more commutable operands is a little fragile. It assumes that the new instructions operands are the same order and positions as the original except for the pair that was swapped. I don't know of anything that breaks this assumption today, but I've left a fixme. Fixing this will likely require an interface change.
llvm-svn: 354738
r354648 was a follow up to fix a regression "[X86] Add a DAG combine for (aext_vector_inreg (aext_vector_inreg X)) -> (aext_vector_inreg X) to fix a regression from my previous commit."
These were reverted in r354713 as their context depended on other patches that were reverted for a bug.
llvm-svn: 354734
Simon Pilgrim