Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Samuel Benzaquen 3199b9a8b5 Fix false positive on anonymous namespaces in headers.
Summary:
Anynoumous namespaces inject a using directive into the AST to import
the names into the containing namespace.
We should not have them in headers, but there is another warning for
that.

Reviewers: djasper

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8443

llvm-svn: 233087
2015-03-24 15:21:45 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko ed824e0e4b [clang-tidy] Refactor: Move google clang-tidy checks to namespace clang::tidy::google
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7994

Patch by Richard Thomson!

llvm-svn: 231364
2015-03-05 13:46:14 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 37f80456ce [clang-tidy] Organized clang-tidy unit tests. NFC.
* Moved unit tests for BracesAroundStatementsCheck to
    ReadabilityModuleTest.cpp.
  * Moved EXPECT_NO_CHANGES macro to ClangTidyTest.h to avoid defining it three
    times.

llvm-svn: 230947
2015-03-02 11:55:04 +00:00
Samuel Benzaquen 59c8aa92b8 Add clang-tidy check google-global-names-in-headers.
Summary:
google-global-names-in-headers flags global namespace pollution in header files.
Right now it only triggers on using declarations and directives.

Reviewers: alexfh

Subscribers: curdeius

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7563

llvm-svn: 228875
2015-02-11 21:21:05 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 72f1e754a7 Move google-explicit-constructor check to a separate source file.
Summary: No functional changes.

Reviewers: djasper

Reviewed By: djasper

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4188

llvm-svn: 211154
2014-06-18 09:33:46 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 4aab579d07 Fix assertion in google-explicit-constructor check when the constructor is
defined in a macro.

Summary:
We shouldn't suggest replacements in macros anyway, as we can't see all
usages of the macro and ensure the replacement is safe for all of them.

Reviewers: klimek

Reviewed By: klimek

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3611

llvm-svn: 207987
2014-05-05 18:49:31 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 3b26849f38 Fix the message for "Move constructor declared explicit".
Make the tests for removal of 'explicit' more diverse.

llvm-svn: 207534
2014-04-29 15:50:14 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 014225e11e Warn on explicit copy constructors.
Summary:
The Google C++ Style Guide doesn't require copy constructors to be
declared explicit, but some people do this by mistake. Make this check detect
and fix such cases.

Reviewers: djasper

Reviewed By: djasper

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3541

llvm-svn: 207531
2014-04-29 15:07:08 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko f65a549a82 clang-tidy explicit constructor check: don't warn on copy or move constructors.
Summary:
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml#Explicit_Constructors
"The exception is copy constructors, which, in the rare cases when we allow
them, should probably not be explicit."

Reviewers: klimek

Reviewed By: klimek

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3122

llvm-svn: 204322
2014-03-20 09:39:36 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko f9a7b46ec6 clang-tidy explicit constructors check: don't warn on deleted constructors.
Reviewers: klimek

Reviewed By: klimek

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3116

llvm-svn: 204226
2014-03-19 12:48:22 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 098871609f Made the ClangTidyTest helper class independent of the testing framework.
Reviewers: klimek

Reviewed By: klimek

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2895

llvm-svn: 202399
2014-02-27 14:28:02 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 32eaa37b15 Fix ExplicitConstructorCheck to warn only on in-class declarations.
Summary:
I'm not absolutely sure this is 100% correct solution, but it seems to
do what I expect.

Reviewers: djasper, klimek

Reviewed By: djasper

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2756

llvm-svn: 201308
2014-02-13 10:11:48 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 85e6e87171 Run llvm/utils/sort_includes.py over the Clang tools code. This doesn't
always produce as pretty of results as it does in LLVM and Clang, but
I don't mind and the value of having a single canonical ordering is very
high IMO.

Let me know if you spot really serious problems here.

llvm-svn: 198703
2014-01-07 20:05:01 +00:00
Daniel Jasper d07c840e6a Initial architecture for clang-tidy.
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.

This is still heavily in flux.

Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
2013-07-29 08:19:24 +00:00