Without the synthesized reference to a symbol in the xray_instr_map,
linker section garbage collection will helpfully remove the whole
xray_instr_map section from the final executable (or archive). This will
cause the runtime to not be able to identify the sleds and hot-patch the
calls/jumps into the runtime trampolines.
This change adds a reference from the text section at the end of the
function to keep around the associated xray_instr_map section as well.
We also make sure that we catch this reference in the test.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, majnemer, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23398
llvm-svn: 279204
This should ensure that we can atomically write two bytes (on top of the
retq and the one past it) and have those two bytes not straddle cache
lines.
We also move the label past the alignment instruction so that we can refer
to the actual first instruction, as opposed to potential padding before the
aligned instruction.
Update the tests to allow us to reflect the new order of assembly.
Reviewers: rSerge, echristo, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23101
llvm-svn: 277701
Summary:
In this patch we implement the following parts of XRay:
- Supporting a function attribute named 'function-instrument' which currently only supports 'xray-always'. We should be able to use this attribute for other instrumentation approaches.
- Supporting a function attribute named 'xray-instruction-threshold' used to determine whether a function is instrumented with a minimum number of instructions (IR instruction counts).
- X86-specific nop sleds as described in the white paper.
- A machine function pass that adds the different instrumentation marker instructions at a very late stage.
- A way of identifying which return opcode is considered "normal" for each architecture.
There are some caveats here:
1) We don't handle PATCHABLE_RET in platforms other than x86_64 yet -- this means if IR used PATCHABLE_RET directly instead of a normal ret, instruction lowering for that platform might do the wrong thing. We think this should be handled at instruction selection time to by default be unpacked for platforms where XRay is not availble yet.
2) The generated section for X86 is different from what is described from the white paper for the sole reason that LLVM allows us to do this neatly. We're taking the opportunity to deviate from the white paper from this perspective to allow us to get richer information from the runtime library.
Reviewers: sanjoy, eugenis, kcc, pcc, echristo, rnk
Subscribers: niravd, majnemer, atrick, rnk, emaste, bmakam, mcrosier, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19904
llvm-svn: 275367
Kuba Mracek