llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Mandeep Singh Grang	029a0567fa	[LLVM] Remove unwanted --check-prefix=CHECK from unit tests. NFC. Summary: Removed unwanted --check-prefix=CHECK from numerous unit tests. Reviewers: t.p.northover, dblaikie, uweigand, MatzeB, tstellarAMD, mcrosier Subscribers: mcrosier, dsanders Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19279 llvm-svn: 266834	2016-04-19 23:51:52 +00:00
Daniel Jasper	15e6954aea	[MachineLICM] First steps of sinking GEPs near calls. Specifically, if there are copy-like instructions in the loop header they are moved into the loop close to their uses. This reduces the live intervals of the values and can avoid register spills. This is working towards a fix for http://llvm.org/PR22230. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7259 Next steps: - Find a better cost model (which non-copy instructions should be sunk?) - Make this dependent on register pressure llvm-svn: 232262	2015-03-14 10:58:38 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Mandeep Singh Grang

029a0567fa

[LLVM] Remove unwanted --check-prefix=CHECK from unit tests. NFC.

Summary: Removed unwanted --check-prefix=CHECK from numerous unit tests.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, dblaikie, uweigand, MatzeB, tstellarAMD, mcrosier

Subscribers: mcrosier, dsanders

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19279

llvm-svn: 266834

2016-04-19 23:51:52 +00:00

Daniel Jasper

15e6954aea

[MachineLICM] First steps of sinking GEPs near calls.

Specifically, if there are copy-like instructions in the loop header
they are moved into the loop close to their uses. This reduces the live
intervals of the values and can avoid register spills.

This is working towards a fix for http://llvm.org/PR22230.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7259

Next steps:
- Find a better cost model (which non-copy instructions should be sunk?)
- Make this dependent on register pressure

llvm-svn: 232262

2015-03-14 10:58:38 +00:00

2 Commits