This folds the compare emission into the select emission when possible, so we
can directly use the flags and don't have to emit a separate compare.
Related to rdar://problem/18960150.
llvm-svn: 221847
In the case we optimize an integer extend away and replace it directly with the
source register, we also have to clear all kill flags at all its uses.
This is necessary, because the orignal IR instruction might be trivially dead,
but we replaced it with a nop at MI level.
llvm-svn: 221628
Reversing a CB* instruction used to drop the flags on the condition. On the
included testcase, this lead to a read from an undefined vreg.
Using addOperand keeps the flags, here <undef>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6159
llvm-svn: 221507
While fixing up the register classes in the machine combiner in a previous
commit I missed one.
This fixes the last one and adds a test case.
llvm-svn: 221308
Registers are not all equal. Some are not allocatable (infinite cost),
some have to be preserved but can be used, and some others are just free
to use.
Ensure there is a cost hierarchy reflecting this fact, so that the
allocator will favor scratch registers over callee-saved registers.
llvm-svn: 221293
Some literals in the AArch64 backend had 15 'f's rather than 16, causing
comparisons with a constant 0xffffffffffffffff to be miscompiled.
llvm-svn: 221157
r212242 introduced a legalizer hook, originally to let AArch64 widen
v1i{32,16,8} rather than scalarize, because the legalizer expected, when
scalarizing the result of a conversion operation, to already have
scalarized the operands. On AArch64, v1i64 is legal, so that commit
ensured operations such as v1i32 = trunc v1i64 wouldn't assert.
It did that by choosing to widen v1 types whenever possible. However,
v1i1 types, for which there's no legal widened type, would still trigger
the assert.
This commit fixes that, by only scalarizing a trunc's result when the
operand has already been scalarized, and introducing an extract_elt
otherwise.
This is similar to r205625.
Fixes PR20777.
llvm-svn: 220937
Earlier this summer I fixed an issue where we were incorrectly combining
multiple loads that had different constraints such alignment, invariance,
temporality, etc. Apparently in one case I made copt paste error and swapped
alignment and invariance.
Tests included.
rdar://18816719
llvm-svn: 220933
Benchmarks have shown that it's harmless to the performance there, and having a
unified set of passes between the two cores where possible helps big.LITTLE
deployment.
Patch by Z. Zheng.
llvm-svn: 220744
This is a minor change to use the immediate version when the operand is a null
value. This should get rid of an unnecessary 'mov' instruction in debug
builds and align the code more with the one generated by SelectionDAG.
This fixes rdar://problem/18785125.
llvm-svn: 220713
The pattern matching for a 'ConstantInt' value was too restrictive. Checking for
a 'Constant' with a bull value is sufficient for using an 'cbz/cbnz' instruction.
This fixes rdar://problem/18784732.
llvm-svn: 220709
This fixes a bug where the input register was not defined for the 'tbz/tbnz'
instruction. This happened, because we folded the 'and' instruction from a
different basic block.
This fixes rdar://problem/18784013.
llvm-svn: 220704
At higher optimization levels the LLVM IR may contain more complex patterns for
loads/stores from/to frame indices. The 'computeAddress' function wasn't able to
handle this and triggered an assertion.
This fix extends the possible addressing modes for frame indices.
This fixes rdar://problem/18783298.
llvm-svn: 220700
This fixes a miscompilation in the AArch64 fast-isel which was
triggered when a branch is based on an icmp with condition eq or ne,
and type i1, i8 or i16. The cbz instruction compares the whole 32-bit
register, so values with the bottom 1, 8 or 16 bits clear would cause
the wrong branch to be taken.
llvm-svn: 220553
This adds support for legalization of instructions of the form:
[fp_conv] <1 x i1> %op to <1 x double>
where fp_conv is one of fpto[us]i, [us]itofp. This used to assert
because they were simply missing from the vector operand scalarizer.
A similar problem arose in r190830, with trunc instead.
Fixes PR20778.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5810
llvm-svn: 220533
This enables targets to adapt their pass pipeline to the register
allocator in use. For example, with the AArch64 backend, using PBQP
with the cortex-a57, the FPLoadBalancing pass is no longer necessary.
llvm-svn: 220321
Every target we support has support for assembly that looks like
a = b - c
.long a
What is special about MachO is that the above combination suppresses the
production of a relocation.
With this change we avoid producing the intermediary labels when they don't
add any value.
llvm-svn: 220256
We should be talking about the number of source elements, not the number of destination elements, given we know at this point that the source and dest element numbers are not the same.
While we're at it, avoid writing to std::vector::end()...
Bug found with random testing and a lot of coffee.
llvm-svn: 220051
When the constant divisor was larger than 32bits, then the optimized code
generated for the AArch64 backend would emit the wrong code, because the shift
was defined as a shift of a 32bit constant '(1<<Lg2(divisor))' and we would
loose the upper 32bits.
This fixes rdar://problem/18678801.
llvm-svn: 219934
This is mostly a copy of the existing FastISel GEP code, but we have to
duplicate it for AArch64, because otherwise we would bail out even for simple
cases. This is because the standard fastEmit functions don't cover MUL at all
and ADD is lowered very inefficientily.
The original commit had a bug in the add emit logic, which has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 219831
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
This is mostly a copy of the existing FastISel GEP code, but on AArch64 we bail
out even for simple cases, because the standard fastEmit functions don't cover
MUL and ADD is lowered inefficientily.
llvm-svn: 219726
Sign-/zero-extend folding depended on the load and the integer extend to be
both selected by FastISel. This cannot always be garantueed and SelectionDAG
might interfer. This commit adds additonal checks to load and integer extend
lowering to catch this.
Related to rdar://problem/18495928.
llvm-svn: 219716
e.g Currently we'll generate following instructions if the immediate is too wide:
MOV X0, WideImmediate
ADD X1, BaseReg, X0
LDR X2, [X1, 0]
Using [Base+XReg] addressing mode can save one ADD as following:
MOV X0, WideImmediate
LDR X2, [BaseReg, X0]
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5477
llvm-svn: 219665
Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby it is
possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in AArch64 state to
generate an incorrect result. The details are quite complex and hard to
determine statically, since branches in the code may exist in some
circumstances, but all cases end with a memory (load, store, or prefetch)
instruction followed immediately by the multiply-accumulate operation.
The safest work-around for this issue is to make the compiler avoid emitting
multiply-accumulate instructions immediately after memory instructions and the
simplest way to do this is to insert a NOP.
This patch implements such work-around in the backend, enabled via the option
-aarch64-fix-cortex-a53-835769.
The work-around code generation is not enabled by default.
llvm-svn: 219603
The code already folds sign-/zero-extends, but only if they are arguments to
mul and shift instructions. This extends the code to also fold them when they
are direct inputs.
llvm-svn: 219187
Tiny enhancement to the address computation code to also fold sub instructions
if the rhs is constant and can be folded into the offset.
llvm-svn: 219186
This commit fixes an issue with sign-/zero-extending loads that was discovered
by Richard Barton.
We use now the correct load instructions for sign-extending loads to 64bit. Also
updated and added more unit tests.
llvm-svn: 219185
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 219010
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 218914
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 218778
Juergen Ributzka