a nested-name-specifier that describes how to refer to that name. For
example, given:
struct Base { int member; };
struct Derived : Base { int member; };
the code-completion result for a member access into "Derived" will
provide both "member" to refer to Derived::member (no qualification needed) and
"Base::member" to refer to Base::member (qualification included).
llvm-svn: 82476
enumerators when either the user intentionally wrote a qualified name
(in which case we just use that nested-name-specifier to match
the user's code) or when this is the first "case" statement and we
need a qualified name to refer to an enumerator in a different scope.
llvm-svn: 82474
And fix a bug with the behavior of min/max instructions formed from
fcmp uge comparisons.
Also, use FiniteOnlyFPMath() for this code instead of UnsafeFPMath,
as it is more specific.
llvm-svn: 82466
from a piece of a large store when both are in the same block.
This allows clang to compile the testcase in PR4216 to this code:
_test_bitfield:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, %ecx
andl $-65536, %ecx
orl $32962, %eax
andl $40186, %eax
orl %ecx, %eax
ret
This is not ideal, but is a whole lot better than the code produced
by llvm-gcc:
_test_bitfield:
movw $-32574, %ax
orw 4(%esp), %ax
andw $-25350, %ax
movw %ax, 4(%esp)
movw 7(%esp), %cx
shlw $8, %cx
movzbl 6(%esp), %edx
orw %cx, %dx
movzwl %dx, %ecx
shll $16, %ecx
movzwl %ax, %eax
orl %ecx, %eax
ret
and dramatically better than that produced by gcc 4.2:
_test_bitfield:
pushl %ebx
call L3
"L00000000001$pb":
L3:
popl %ebx
movl 8(%esp), %eax
leal 0(,%eax,4), %edx
sarb $7, %dl
movl %eax, %ecx
andl $7168, %ecx
andl $-7201, %ebx
movzbl %dl, %edx
andl $1, %edx
sall $5, %edx
orl %ecx, %ebx
orl %edx, %ebx
andl $24, %eax
andl $-58336, %ebx
orl %eax, %ebx
orl $32962, %ebx
movl %ebx, %eax
popl %ebx
ret
llvm-svn: 82439
is.
- The problem is that formatted_ostream forces its underlying buffer to be
unbuffered, so if some client happens to wrap a formatted_ostream around
something, but still use the underlying stream, then we can end up writing on
a fully unbuffered output (which was never intended to be unbuffered).
- This makes clang (and presumably llvm-gcc) -emit-llvm -S a mere 10x faster.
llvm-svn: 82434
- Currently this requires us to fake an input file.
- This allows Sema to be keep all the logic for how to pull decls out of the external AST source and how to handle things like tentative definitions.
llvm-svn: 82432
feature, either build the JIT in debug mode to enable it by default or pass
-jit-emit-debug to lli.
Right now, the only debug information that this communicates to GDB is call
frame information, since it's already being generated to support exceptions in
the JIT. Eventually, when DWARF generation isn't tied so tightly to AsmPrinter,
it will be easy to push that information to GDB through this interface.
Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how the feature works:
- The JIT generates the machine code and DWARF call frame info
(.eh_frame/.debug_frame) for a function into memory.
- The JIT copies that info into an in-memory ELF file with a symbol for the
function.
- The JIT creates a code entry pointing to the ELF buffer and adds it to a
linked list hanging off of a global descriptor at a special symbol that GDB
knows about.
- The JIT calls a function marked noinline that GDB knows about and has put an
internal breakpoint in.
- GDB catches the breakpoint and reads the global descriptor to look for new
code.
- When sees there is new code, it reads the ELF from the inferior's memory and
adds it to itself as an object file.
- The JIT continues, and the next time we stop the program, we are able to
produce a proper backtrace.
Consider running the following program through the JIT:
#include <stdio.h>
void baz(short z) {
long w = z + 1;
printf("%d, %x\n", w, *((int*)NULL)); // SEGFAULT here
}
void bar(short y) {
int z = y + 1;
baz(z);
}
void foo(char x) {
short y = x + 1;
bar(y);
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
char x = 1;
foo(x);
}
Here is a backtrace before this patch:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x2aaaabdfbd10 (LWP 25476)]
0x00002aaaabe7d1a8 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00002aaaabe7d1a8 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000003 in ?? ()
#2 0x0000000000000004 in ?? ()
#3 0x00032aaaabe7cfd0 in ?? ()
#4 0x00002aaaabe7d12c in ?? ()
#5 0x00022aaa00000003 in ?? ()
#6 0x00002aaaabe7d0aa in ?? ()
#7 0x01000002abe7cff0 in ?? ()
#8 0x00002aaaabe7d02c in ?? ()
#9 0x0100000000000001 in ?? ()
#10 0x00000000014388e0 in ?? ()
#11 0x00007fff00000001 in ?? ()
#12 0x0000000000b870a2 in llvm::JIT::runFunction (this=0x1405b70,
F=0x14024e0, ArgValues=@0x7fffffffe050)
at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.cpp:395
#13 0x0000000000baa4c5 in llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain
(this=0x1405b70, Fn=0x14024e0, argv=@0x13f06f8, envp=0x7fffffffe3b0)
at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.cpp:377
#14 0x00000000007ebd52 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe398,
envp=0x7fffffffe3b0) at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/tools/lli/lli.cpp:208
And a backtrace after this patch:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00002aaaabe7d1a8 in baz ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00002aaaabe7d1a8 in baz ()
#1 0x00002aaaabe7d12c in bar ()
#2 0x00002aaaabe7d0aa in foo ()
#3 0x00002aaaabe7d02c in main ()
#4 0x0000000000b870a2 in llvm::JIT::runFunction (this=0x1405b70,
F=0x14024e0, ArgValues=...)
at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.cpp:395
#5 0x0000000000baa4c5 in llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain
(this=0x1405b70, Fn=0x14024e0, argv=..., envp=0x7fffffffe3c0)
at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.cpp:377
#6 0x00000000007ebd52 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe3a8,
envp=0x7fffffffe3c0) at /home/rnk/llvm-gdb/tools/lli/lli.cpp:208
llvm-svn: 82418
Douglas Gregor