Summary:
I inspected every test and did one of the following:
- changed the test to run in all language modes,
- added a comment explaining why the test is only applicable in a
certain mode,
- limited the test to language modes where it passes and added a FIXME
to fix the checker or the test.
Reviewers: alexfh, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125
llvm-svn: 361131
Summary:
The goal is to reduce false positives when the difference is intentional, like:
foo(StringRef name);
foo(StringRef name_ref) {
string name = cleanup(name_ref);
...
}
Or semantically unimportant, like:
foo(StringRef full_name);
foo(StringRef name) { ... }
There are other matching names we won't recognise (e.g. syns vs synonyms) but
this catches many that we see in practice, and gives people a systematic
workaround.
The old behavior is available as a 'Strict' option.
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49285
llvm-svn: 336992
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, piotrdz, hokein, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716
llvm-svn: 321913
With this, site specific lit configs can inject parameters into the
test scripts if they need site specific parameters.
Next up: enable check_clang_tidy to take a resource dir to enable
non-standard locations for builtin includes.
llvm-svn: 251010
This is first of series of patches, porting code from my project colobot-lint,
as I mentioned recently in cfe-dev mailing list.
This patch adds a new check in readability module:
readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name. I also added appropriate
testcases and documentation.
I chose readability module, as it seems it is the best place for it.
I think I followed the rules of LLVM coding guideline, but I may have missed
something, as I usually use other code formatting style.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12462
Patch by Piotr Dziwinski!
llvm-svn: 247261
Dmitri Gribenko