Fix the crash resulting from a careless use of getLocWithOffset. At the
beginning of a macro expansion it produces an invalid SourceLocation that causes
an assertion failure later on.
llvm-svn: 357312
Summary:
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy.The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32575 where you can find more information.
For example:
```
template <typename T0>
struct S {
template <typename T>
void g() const {
int a;
(void)a;
}
};
void f() {
S<int>().g<int>();
}
```
this piece of code should not trigger any warning by the check modernize-redundant-void-arg but when we execute the following command
```
clang_tidy -checks=-*,modernize-redundant-void-arg test.cpp -- -std=c++11
```
we obtain the following warning:
/Users/eco419/Desktop/clang-tidy.project/void-redundand_2/test.cpp:6:6: warning: redundant void argument list in function declaration [modernize-redundant-void-arg]
(void)a;
^~~~
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: JonasToth, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52135
llvm-svn: 342388
Summary: The check was assuming that a definition of a function always has a body, but a declaration that explicitly defaults or deletes a function is a definition too.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14238
llvm-svn: 251807
Summary:
When applying this check to the unit tests, it would hit an assertion:
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:1056: clang::SourceLocation clang::Lexer::getSourceLocation(const char*, unsigned int) const: Assertion `PP && "This doesn't work on raw lexers"' failed.
Reviewers: klimek, LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14204
llvm-svn: 251792
This check for clang-tidy looks for function with zero arguments declared as (void) and removes the unnecessary void token.
int foo(void);
becomes
int foo();
The check performs no formatting of the surrounding context but uses the lexer to look for the token sequence "(", "void", ")" in the prototype text. If this sequence of tokens is found, a removal is issued for the void token only.
Patch by Richard Thomson!
(+fixed tests, moved the check to the modernize module)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639
llvm-svn: 251475
Alexander Kornienko