Teach x86 assembly operand parsing to distinguish between assembler
variable assigned to named registers and those assigned to immediate
values.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, void
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56287
llvm-svn: 350966
This basically reverts a change made in r336217, but improves the text of the error message for not allowing IP-relative addressing in 32-bit mode.
Fixes PR38826.
Patch by Iain Sandoe.
llvm-svn: 341512
This might make the error message added in r335668 unneeded, but I'm not sure yet.
The check for RIP is technically unnecessary since RIP is in GR64, but that fact is kind of surprising so be explicit.
llvm-svn: 336217
-Ensure EIP isn't used with an index reigster.
-Ensure EIP isn't used as index register.
-Ensure base register isn't a vector register.
-Ensure eiz/riz usage matches the size of their base register.
llvm-svn: 335412
The second register is the index register and should only be %si or %di if used with a base register. And in that case the base register should be %bp or %bx.
This makes us compatible with gas.
We do still need to support both orders with Intel syntax which uses [bp+si] and [si+bp]
llvm-svn: 335384
Summary:
We should always be able to accept AVX512 registers and instructions in llvm-mc. The only subtarget mode that should be checked is 16-bit vs 32-bit vs 64-bit mode.
I've also removed all the mattr/mcpu lines from test RUN lines to be consistent with this. Most were due to AVX512, but a few were for other features.
Fixes PR36202
Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, bkramer
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42824
llvm-svn: 324106
We can't do a perfect job here. We *have* to allow (%dx) even in 64-bit
mode, for example, because it might be used for an unofficial form of
the in/out instructions. We actually want to do a better job of validation
*later*. Perhaps *instead* of doing it where we are at the moment.
But for now, doing what validation we *can* do in the place that the code
already has its validation, is an improvement.
llvm-svn: 198760
The issue was that the MatchingInlineAsm and VariantID args to the
MatchInstructionImpl function weren't being set properly. Specifically, when
parsing intel syntax, the parser thought it was parsing inline assembly in the
at&t dialect; that will never be the case.
The crash was caused when the emitter tried to emit the instruction, but the
operands weren't set. When parsing inline assembly we only set the opcode, not
the operands, which is used to lookup the instruction descriptor.
rdar://13854391 and PR15945
Also, this commit reverts r176036. Now that we're correctly parsing the intel
syntax the pushad/popad don't match properly. I've reimplemented that fix using
a MnemonicAlias.
llvm-svn: 181620
When an instruction as written requires 32-bit mode and we're assembling
in 64-bit mode, or vice-versa, issue a more specific diagnostic about
what's wrong.
rdar://12700702
llvm-svn: 167937
not depend on In32BitMode. Use the sysexitq mnemonic for the version with the
REX.W prefix and only allow it only In64BitMode. rdar://9738584
llvm-svn: 143112
the X86 asmparser to produce ranges in the one case that was annoying me, for example:
test.s:10:15: error: invalid operand for instruction
movl 0(%rax), 0(%edx)
^~~~~~~
It should be straight-forward to enhance filecheck, tblgen, and/or the .ll parser to use
ranges where appropriate if someone is interested.
llvm-svn: 142106
for cpp pre-processed assembly we give correct filename and line numbers when
reporting errors in assembly files when using clang and -integrated-as on .s
files. rdar://8998895
llvm-svn: 141814
This can happen in cases where TableGen generated asm matcher cannot check
whether a register operand is in the right register class. e.g. mem operands.
rdar://8204588
llvm-svn: 136292
Craig Topper