It has no place there; it's not a property of the Module, and it makes
restoring the visibility set when we leave a submodule more difficult.
llvm-svn: 236300
Modules builds fundamentally have a non-linear macro history. In the interest
of better source fidelity, represent the macro definition information
faithfully: we have a linear macro directive history within each module, and at
any point we have a unique "latest" local macro directive and a collection of
visible imported directives. This also removes the attendent complexity of
attempting to create a correct MacroDirective history (which we got wrong
in the general case).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 236176
the active module macros at the point of definition, rather than reconstructing
it from the macro history. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 235941
Previously we'd defer this determination until writing the AST, which doesn't
allow us to use this information when building other submodules of the same
module. This change also allows us to use a uniform mechanism for writing
module macro records, independent of whether they are local or imported.
llvm-svn: 235614
This graph will be used to determine the current set of active macros. This is
foundation work for getting macro visibility correct across submodules of the
current module. No functionality change for now.
llvm-svn: 235461
ExpandBuiltinMacro would strip the identifier and downstream users crash
when they encounter an identifier token with nullptr identifier info.
Found by afl-fuzz.
llvm-svn: 233497
Now that SmallString is a first-class citizen, most SmallString::str()
calls are not required. This patch removes a whole bunch of them, yet
there are lots more.
There are two use cases where str() is really needed:
1) To use one of StringRef member functions which is not available in
SmallString.
2) To convert to std::string, as StringRef implicitly converts while
SmallString do not. We may wish to change this, but it may introduce
ambiguity.
llvm-svn: 232622
These calls are usually guarded by checks for isAnnotation() but it
looks like we missed a spot. This would cause the included test to
crash clang.
llvm-svn: 232616
This adds the -fapplication-extension option, along with the
ios_app_extension and macosx_app_extension availability attributes.
Patch by Ted Kremenek
llvm-svn: 230989
We would CreateString on arbitrary garbage instead of just skipping to
the end of the builtin macro. Eventually, this would cause us to crash
because we would end up replacing the contents of a character token with
a numeric literal.
This fixes PR21825.
llvm-svn: 224238
This means that a pointer to the struct type to which the attribute appertains
is a CF type (and therefore an Objective-C object of some type), but not of any
specific class. rdar://19157264
llvm-svn: 224072
Use the bitmask to store the set of enabled sanitizers instead of a
bitfield. On the negative side, it makes syntax for querying the
set of enabled sanitizers a bit more clunky. On the positive side, we
will be able to use SanitizerKind to eventually implement the
new semantics for -fsanitize-recover= flag, that would allow us
to make some sanitizers recoverable, and some non-recoverable.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 221558
#include_next interacts poorly with modules: it depends on where in the list of
include paths the current file was found. Files covered by module maps are not
found in include search paths when building the module (and are not found in
include search paths when @importing the module either), so this isn't really
meaningful. Instead, we fake up the result that #include_next *should* have
given: find the first path that would have resulted in the given file being
picked, and search from there onwards.
llvm-svn: 220177
In code-completion, don't assume there is a MacroInfo for everything,
since we aren't serializing the def corresponding to a later #undef in
the same module. Also setup the HadMacro bit correctly for undefs to
avoid an assertion failure.
rdar://18416901
llvm-svn: 218694
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
intent when we added remark support, but was never implemented in the general
case, because the first -R flags didn't need it. (-Rpass= had special handling
to accomodate its argument.)
-Rno-foo, -Reverything, and -Rno-everything can be used to turn off a remark,
or to turn on or off all remarks. Per discussion on cfe-commits, -Weverything
does not affect remarks, and -Reverything does not affect warnings or errors.
The only "real" -R flag we have right now is -Rmodule-build; that flag is
effectively renamed from -Wmodule-build to -Rmodule-build by this change.
-Wpass and -Wno-pass (and their friends) are also renamed to -Rpass and
-Rno-pass by this change; it's not completely clear whether we intended to have
a -Rpass (with no =pattern), but that is unchanged by this commit, other than
the flag name. The default pattern is effectively one which matches no passes.
In future, we may want to make the default pattern be .*, so that -Reverything
works for -Rpass properly.
llvm-svn: 215046
Summary:
The limits on the number of fix-it hints and ranges attached to a
diagnostic are arbitrary and don't apply universally to all users of the
DiagnosticsEngine. The way the limits are enforced may lead to diagnostics
generating invalid sets of fixes. I suggest removing the limits, which will also
simplify the implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3879
llvm-svn: 209468
At one point, -fexceptions was a synonym for -fcxx-exceptions. While
the driver options still enables cxx-exceptions by default, the cc1
flag is purely about exception tables and this doesn't account for
objective C exceptions. Because of this, checking for the
cxx_exceptions feature in objective C++ often gives the wrong answer.
The cxx_exceptions feature should be based on the -fcxx-exceptions cc1
flag, not -fexceptions. Furthermore, at some point the tests were
changed to use cc1 even though they were testing the driver behaviour.
We're better off testing both the driver and cc1 here.
llvm-svn: 206352
The -fms-extensions option affects a number of subtle front-end C/C++
behaviors, and it would be useful to be able to distinguish MS keywords
from regular identifiers in the ms-extensions mode even if the triple
does not define a Windows target. It should make life easier if anyone
needs to port their Windows codes to elsewhere.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3034
llvm-svn: 206069
Clean up the __has_attribute implementation without modifying its behavior.
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 205181
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 204952
it, importers of B should not see the macro. This is complicated by the fact
that A's macro could also be visible through a different path. The rules (as
hashed out on cfe-commits) are included as a documentation update in this
change.
With this, the number of regressions in libc++'s testsuite when modules are
enabled drops from 47 to 7. Those remaining 7 are also macro-related, and are
due to remaining bugs in this change (in particular, the handling of submodules
is imperfect).
llvm-svn: 202560
This C++ feature has been marked complete since r191549, but the documentation
claimed it wasn't supported at all and the extension check misreported it as
being available in C.
No regression test; this was a short-lived typo.
llvm-svn: 199292
Richard Smith