Do not call SplitBlockPredecessors on a loop preheader when one of the
predecessors is an indirectbr. Otherwise, you will hit this assert:
!isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[i]->getTerminator()) && "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst"
llvm-svn: 153134
instead of skipping the current loop.
My prior fix was incomplete because of an overzealous compile-time optimization:
Better fix for: <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 153131
This results in things such as
vmovups 16(%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153092
i128). In that case, we may not be able to print out the MCExpr as an
expression. For instance, we could have an MCExpr like this:
0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 | (0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 << 64)
The MCExpr printer handles sizes up to 64-bits, but this expression would
require 128-bits. In this situation, try to evaluate the constant expression and
emit that as the value into 64-bit chunks.
<rdar://problem/11070338>
llvm-svn: 153081
X86InstrCompiler.td.
It also adds –mcpu-generic to the legalize-shift-64.ll test so the test
will pass if run on an Intel Atom CPU, which would otherwise
produce an instruction schedule which differs from that which the test expects.
llvm-svn: 153033
It's not a good style idea, as the registers will be laid down in memory in
numerical order, not the order they're in the list, but it's legal. vldm/vstm
are stricter.
rdar://11064740
llvm-svn: 152943
alignment. If that's the case, then we want to make sure that we don't increase
the alignment of the store instruction. Because if we increase it to be "more
aligned" than the pointer, code-gen may use instructions which require a greater
alignment than the pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152907
It was added in 2007 as the first cut at supporting no-inline
attributes, but we didn't have function attributes of any form at the
time. However, it was added without any mention in the LangRef or other
documentation.
Later on, in 2008, Devang added function notes for 'inline=never' and
then turned them into proper function attributes. From that point
onward, as far as I can tell, the world moved on, and no one has touched
'llvm.noinline' in any meaningful way since.
It's time has now come. We have had better mechanisms for doing this for
a long time, all the frontends I'm aware of use them, and this is just
holding back progress. Given that it was never a documented feature of
the IR, I've provided no auto-upgrade support. If people know of real,
in-the-wild bitcode that relies on this, yell at me and I'll add it, but
I *seriously* doubt anyone cares.
llvm-svn: 152904
Only record IVUsers that are dominated by simplified loop
headers. Otherwise SCEVExpander will crash while looking for a
preheader.
I previously tried to work around this in LSR itself, but that was
insufficient. This way, LSR can continue to run if some uses are not
in simple loops, as long as we don't attempt to analyze those users.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 152892
out the DW_AT_name. Older gdbs unfortunately still use it to
disambiguate member functions in templated classes (gdb.cp/templates.exp).
rdar://11043421 (which is now deferred for a bit)
llvm-svn: 152782
This results in things such as
vmovaps -96(%rbx), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, -96(%rbx), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://10643481
llvm-svn: 152762
correlated pairs of pointer arguments at the callsite. This is designed
to recognize the common C++ idiom of begin/end pointer pairs when the
end pointer is a constant offset from the begin pointer. With the
C-based idiom of a pointer and size, the inline cost saw the constant
size calculation, and this provides the same level of information for
begin/end pairs.
In order to propagate this information we have to search for candidate
operations on a pair of pointer function arguments (or derived from
them) which would be simplified if the pointers had a known constant
offset. Then the callsite analysis looks for such pointer pairs in the
argument list, and applies the appropriate bonus.
This helps LLVM detect that half of bounds-checked STL algorithms
(such as hash_combine_range, and some hybrid sort implementations)
disappear when inlined with a constant size input. However, it's not
a complete fix due the inaccuracy of our cost metric for constants in
general. I'm looking into that next.
Benchmarks showed no significant code size change, and very minor
performance changes. However, specific code such as hashing is showing
significantly cleaner inlining decisions.
llvm-svn: 152752
output (we're emitting a specification already and the information
isn't changing).
Saves 1% on the debug information for a build of llvm.
Fixes rdar://11043421
llvm-svn: 152697
(i16 load $addr+c*sizeof(i16)) and replace uses of (i32 vextract) with the
i16 load. It should issue an extload instead: (i32 extload $addr+c*sizeof(i16)).
rdar://11035895
llvm-svn: 152675
candidate set for subsequent inlining, try to simplify the arguments to
the inner call site now that inlining has been performed.
The goal here is to propagate and fold constants through deeply nested
call chains. Without doing this, we loose the inliner bonus that should
be applied because the arguments don't match the exact pattern the cost
estimator uses.
Reviewed on IRC by Benjamin Kramer.
llvm-svn: 152556
Chad Rosier