TableGen checks at compiletime that for scheduling models with
"CompleteModel = 1" one of the following holds:
- Is marked with the hasNoSchedulingInfo flag
- The instruction is a subclass of Sched
- There are InstRW definitions in the scheduling model
Typical steps necessary to complete a model:
- Ensure all pseudo instructions that are expanded before machine
scheduling (usually everything handled with EmitYYY() functions in
XXXTargetLowering).
- If a CPU does not support some instructions mark the corresponding
resource unsupported: "WriteRes<WriteXXX, []> { let Unsupported = 1; }".
- Add missing scheduling information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17747
llvm-svn: 262384
Change MachineInstr API to prefer MachineInstr& over MachineInstr*
whenever the parameter is expected to be non-null. Slowly inching
toward being able to fix PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262149
In all but one case, change the DFAPacketizer API to take MachineInstr&
instead of MachineInstr*. In DFAPacketizer::endPacket(), take
MachineBasicBlock::iterator. Besides cleaning up the API, this is in
search of PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262142
Update APIs in MachineInstrBundle.h to take and return MachineInstr&
instead of MachineInstr* when the instruction cannot be null. Besides
being a nice cleanup, this is tacking toward a fix for PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262141
Take MachineInstr by reference instead of by pointer in SlotIndexes and
the SlotIndex wrappers in LiveIntervals. The MachineInstrs here are
never null, so this cleans up the API a bit. It also incidentally
removes a few implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr* (see PR26753).
At a couple of call sites it was convenient to convert to a range-based
for loop over MachineBasicBlock::instr_begin/instr_end, so I added
MachineBasicBlock::instrs.
llvm-svn: 262115
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
llvm-svn: 261577
Delete MachineInstr::getIterator(), since the term "iterator" is
overloaded when talking about MachineInstr.
- Downcast to ilist_node in iplist::getNextNode() and getPrevNode() so
that ilist_node::getIterator() is still available.
- Add it back as MachineInstr::getInstrIterator(). This matches the
naming in MachineBasicBlock.
- Add MachineInstr::getBundleIterator(). This is explicitly called
"bundle" (not matching MachineBasicBlock) to disintinguish it clearly
from ilist_node::getIterator().
- Update all calls. Some of these I switched to `auto` to remove
boiler-plate, since the new name is clear about the type.
There was one call I updated that looked fishy, but it wasn't clear what
the right answer was. This was in X86FrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(),
added in r252578 in lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp. I opted to
leave the behaviour unchanged, but I'll reply to the original commit on
the list in a moment.
llvm-svn: 261504
Compiling Hexagon target with GCC 6 produces "error: should have been
declared inside" due to GCC PR c++/69657 which was merged.
Properly wrapping operator<<() definitions within the namespace llvm
fixes the issue.
Author: domagoj.stolfa
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17281
llvm-svn: 261220
The usual way to get a 32-bit relocation is to use a constant extender which doubles the size of the instruction, 4 bytes to 8 bytes.
Another way is to put a .word32 and mix code and data within a function. The disadvantage is it's not a valid instruction encoding and jumping over it causes prefetch stalls inside the hardware.
This relocation packs a 23-bit value in to an "r0 = add(rX, #a)" instruction by overwriting the source register bits. Since r0 is the return value register, if this instruction is placed after a function call which return void, r0 will be filled with an undefined value, the prefetch won't be confused, and the callee can access the constant value by way of the link register.
llvm-svn: 261006
Once a pointer is turned into a reference it cannot be nullptr, clang
rightfully warns about this assert being a tautology. Put the assert
before the reference is created.
llvm-svn: 260949
Replace spills to memory with spills to registers, if possible. This
applies mostly to predicate registers (both scalar and vector), since
they are very limited in number. A spill of a predicate register may
happen even if there is a general-purpose register available. In cases
like this the stack spill/reload may be eliminated completely.
This optimization will consider all stack objects, regardless of where
they came from and try to match the live range of the stack slot with
a dead range of a register from an appropriate register class.
llvm-svn: 260758
Rewrite the code to handle all pseudo-instructions in a single pass.
This temporarily reverts spill slot optimization that used general-
purpose registers to hold values of spilled predicate registers.
llvm-svn: 260696
We can generate the actual instructions from the intrinsics without the
need for pseudo-instructions. Also, since the intrinsics have a side-
effect in a form of a store, attempt to optimize away loads from the
store location.
llvm-svn: 260690
The DataLayout can calculate alignment of vectors based on the alignment
of the element type and the number of elements. In fact, it is the product
of these two values. The problem is that for vectors of N x i1, this will
return the alignment of N bytes, since the alignment of i1 is 8 bits. The
vector types of vNi1 should be aligned to N bits instead. Provide explicit
alignment for HVX vectors to avoid such complications.
llvm-svn: 260678
Sanjay Patel