Most architectures use .got instead of .got.plt, so switching the default can
minimize customization.
This fixes an issue for SPARC V9 which uses .got .
AVR, AMDGPU, and MSP430 don't seem to use _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
D62727 removed GotEntrySize and GotPltEntrySize with a comment that they
are always equal to wordsize(), but that is not entirely true: X32 has a
word size of 4, but needs 8-byte GOT entries. This restores gotEntrySize
for both, adjusted for current naming conventions, but defaults it to
config->wordsize to keep things simple for architectures other than
x86_64.
This partially reverts D62727.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102509
With this change, `TargetInfo::adjustRelaxExpr` is only related to TLS
relaxations and a subsequent clean-up can delete the `data` parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92079
Prefer `errorOrWarn` to `fatal` for recoverable errors and graceful degradation
when --noinhibit-exec is specified.
Mention the destination symbol, otherwise the diagnostic is not really actionable.
Two errors are not tested but the patch does not intend to add the coverage.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87486
The PC Relative code now allows for calls that are marked with the relocation
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC. This indicates that the caller does not have a valid TOC
pointer in R2 and does not require R2 to be restored after the call.
This patch is added to support local calls to callees that require a TOC
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay, nemanjai, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83504
In the 64-bit ELF V2 API Specification: Power Architecture, 2.3.3.1. GPR
Save and Restore Functions defines some special functions which may be
referenced by GCC produced assembly (LLVM does not reference them).
With GCC -Os, when the number of call-saved registers exceeds a certain
threshold, GCC generates `_savegpr0_* _restgpr0_*` calls and expects the
linker to define them. See
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2002-February/017444.html and
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2004-August/036765.html . This
is weird because libgcc.a would be the natural place. However, the linker
generation approach has the advantage that the linker can generate
multiple copies to avoid long branch thunks. We don't consider the
advantage significant enough to complicate our trunk implementation, so
we take a simple approach.
* Check whether `_savegpr0_{14..31}` are used
* If yes, define needed symbols and add an InputSection with the code sequence.
`_savegpr1_*` `_restgpr0_*` and `_restgpr1_*` are similar.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79977
This is part of the Propeller framework to do post link code layout
optimizations. Please see the RFC here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/ef3mKzAdJ7U/1shV64BYBAAJ and the
detailed RFC doc here:
https://github.com/google/llvm-propeller/blob/plo-dev/Propeller_RFC.pdf
This patch adds lld support for basic block sections and performs relaxations
after the basic blocks have been reordered.
After the linker has reordered the basic block sections according to the
desired sequence, it runs a relaxation pass to optimize jump instructions.
Currently, the compiler emits the long form of all jump instructions. AMD64 ISA
supports variants of jump instructions with one byte offset or a four byte
offset. The compiler generates jump instructions with R_X86_64 32-bit PC
relative relocations. We would like to use a new relocation type for these jump
instructions as it makes it easy and accurate while relaxing these instructions.
The relaxation pass does two things:
First, it deletes all explicit fall-through direct jump instructions between
adjacent basic blocks. This is done by discarding the tail of the basic block
section.
Second, If there are consecutive jump instructions, it checks if the first
conditional jump can be inverted to convert the second into a fall through and
delete the second.
The jump instructions are relaxed by using jump instruction mods, something
like relocations. These are used to modify the opcode of the jump instruction.
Jump instruction mods contain three values, instruction offset, jump type and
size. While writing this jump instruction out to the final binary, the linker
uses the jump instruction mod to determine the opcode and the size of the
modified jump instruction. These mods are required because the input object
files are memory-mapped without write permissions and directly modifying the
object files requires copying these sections. Copying a large number of basic
block sections significantly bloats memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68065
For an out-of-range relocation referencing a non-local symbol, report the symbol name and the object file that defines the symbol. As an example:
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]
```
=>
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]; references func
>>> defined in t1.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73518
Symbol information can be used to improve out-of-range/misalignment diagnostics.
It also helps R_ARM_CALL/R_ARM_THM_CALL which has different behaviors with different symbol types.
There are many (67) relocateOne() call sites used in thunks, {Arm,AArch64}errata, PLT, etc.
Rename them to `relocateNoSym()` to be clearer that there is no symbol information.
Reviewed By: grimar, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73254
These functions call relocateOne(). This patch is a prerequisite for
making relocateOne() aware of `Symbol` (D73254).
Reviewed By: grimar, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73250
This patch is a joint work by Rui Ueyama and me based on D58102 by Xiang Zhang.
It adds Intel CET (Control-flow Enforcement Technology) support to lld.
The implementation follows the draft version of psABI which you can
download from https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki/X86-psABI.
CET introduces a new restriction on indirect jump instructions so that
you can limit the places to which you can jump to using indirect jumps.
In order to use the feature, you need to compile source files with
-fcf-protection=full.
* IBT is enabled if all input files are compiled with the flag. To force enabling ibt, pass -z force-ibt.
* SHSTK is enabled if all input files are compiled with the flag, or if -z shstk is specified.
IBT-enabled executables/shared objects have two PLT sections, ".plt" and
".plt.sec". For the details as to why we have two sections, please read
the comments.
Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59780
RELA targets don't read initial .got.plt entries.
REL targets (ARM, x86-32) write the address of the IFUNC resolver to the
entry (`write32le(buf, s.getVA())`).
The default writeIgotPlt() is not meaningful. Make it a no-op. AArch64
and x86-64 will have 0 as initial .got.plt entries associated with
IFUNC.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72474
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
This change only affects EM_386. relOff can be computed from `index`
easily, so it is unnecessarily passed as a parameter.
Both in.plt and in.iplt entries are written by writePLT. For in.iplt,
the instruction `push reloc_offset` will change because `index` is now
different. Fortunately, this does not matter because `push; jmp` is only
used by PLT. IPLT does not need the code sequence.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71518
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.
This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.
Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.
Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.
For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.
Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.
Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383
llvm-svn: 363928
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl
should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate
their lib32 (PR40888).
* Fix default image base and max page size.
* Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not
implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't
support Secure PLT yet.
* Support more initial relocation types:
R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16.
The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type
but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA.
* Support GNU ifunc
* Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc
* Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub.
It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24.
A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to
.got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative
addresses).
Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub
can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility,
change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to
`const InputSection &, const Relocation &`.
PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both
writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments,
which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable.
This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to
address the security issue.
TLS will be implemented in D62940.
glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can
not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack
(not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to
work around the issue:
if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) {
// Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt
Add(In.RelaDyn);
if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent)
In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt);
}
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464
llvm-svn: 362721
GotEntrySize and GotPltEntrySize were added in D22288. Later, with
the introduction of wordsize() (then Config->Wordsize), they become
redundant, because there is no target that sets GotEntrySize or
GotPltEntrySize to a number different from Config->Wordsize.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62727
llvm-svn: 362220
The -n (--nmagic) disables page alignment, and acts as a -Bstatic
The -N (--omagic) does what -n does but also marks the executable segment as
writeable. As page alignment is disabled headers are not allocated unless
explicit in the linker script.
To disable page alignment in LLD we choose to set the page sizes to 1 so
that any alignment based on the page size does nothing. To set the
Target->PageSize to 1 we implement -z common-page-size, which has the side
effect of allowing the user to set the value as well.
Setting the page alignments to 1 does mean that any use of
CONSTANT(MAXPAGESIZE) or CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE) in a linker script will
return 1, unlike in ld.bfd. However given that -n and -N disable paging
these probably shouldn't be used in a linker script where -n or -N is in
use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61688
llvm-svn: 360593
This is based on D54720 by Sean Fertile.
When accessing a global symbol which is not defined in the translation unit,
compilers will generate instructions that load the address from the toc entry.
If the symbol is defined, non-preemptable, and addressable with a 32-bit
signed offset from the toc pointer, the address can be computed
directly. e.g.
addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
ld 3, .LC0@toc@l(3) # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS, load the address from a .toc entry
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC0: .tc var[TC],var
can be relaxed to
addis 3,2,var@toc@ha # this may be relaxed to a nop,
addi 3,3,var@toc@l # then this becomes addi 3,2,var@toc
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
We can delete the test ppc64-got-indirect.s as its purpose is covered by
newly added ppc64-toc-relax.s and ppc64-toc-relax-constants.s
Reviewed By: ruiu, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60958
llvm-svn: 360112
This change itself doesn't mean anything, but it helps D59780 because
in patch, we don't know whether we need to create a CET-aware PLT or
not until we read all input files.
llvm-svn: 357194
A follow up to the intial patch that unblocked linking against libgcc.
For lld we don't need to bother tracking which objects have got based small
code model relocations. This is due to the fact that the compilers on
powerpc64 use the .toc section to generate indirections to symbols (rather then
using got relocations) which keeps the got small. This makes overflowing a
small code model got relocation very unlikely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57245
llvm-svn: 353849
Summary:
R_PPC64_TLSGD and R_PPC64_TLSLD are used as markers on TLS code sequences. After GD-to-IE or GD-to-LE relaxation, the next relocation R_PPC64_REL24 should be skipped to not create a false dependency on __tls_get_addr. When linking statically, the false dependency may cause an "undefined symbol: __tls_get_addr" error.
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_LO
R_PPC64_TLSGD R_TLSDESC_CALL
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, syzaara, espindola
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits, tamur
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57673
llvm-svn: 353262
Guessing that the slashes used in the scripts SECTION command was causing the
windows related failures in the added test.
Original commit message:
Small code model global variable access on PPC64 has a very limited range of
addressing. The instructions the relocations are used on add an offset in the
range [-0x8000, 0x7FFC] to the toc pointer which points to .got +0x8000, giving
an addressable range of [.got, .got + 0xFFFC]. While user code can be recompiled
with medium and large code models when the binary grows too large for small code
model, there are small code model relocations in the crt files and libgcc.a
which are typically shipped with the distros, and the ABI dictates that linkers
must allow linking of relocatable object files using different code models.
To minimze the chance of relocation overflow, any file that contains a small
code model relocation should have its .toc section placed closer to the .got
then any .toc from a file without small code model relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56920
llvm-svn: 352071
Small code model global variable access on PPC64 has a very limited range of
addressing. The instructions the relocations are used on add an offset in the
range [-0x8000, 0x7FFC] to the toc pointer which points to .got +0x8000, giving
an addressable range of [.got, .got + 0xFFFC]. While user code can be recompiled
with medium and large code models when the binary grows too large for small code
model, there are small code model relocations in the crt files and libgcc.a
which are typically shipped with the distros, and the ABI dictates that linkers
must allow linking of relocatable object files using different code models.
To minimze the chance of relocation overflow, any file that contains a small
code model relocation should have its .toc section placed closer to the .got
then any .toc from a file without small code model relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56920
llvm-svn: 351978
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Patch by Michael Skvortsov!
This change adds a basic support for linking static MSP430 ELF code.
Implemented relocation types are intended to correspond to the BFD.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56535
llvm-svn: 350819
This patch also makes getPltEntryOffset a non-member function because
it doesn't depend on any private members of the TargetInfo class.
I tried a few different ideas, and it seems this change fits in best to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54981
llvm-svn: 347781
Summary:
When --noinhibit-exec is used, ld.bfd/gold emit errors but allow to produce corrupted executable, which is handy for debugging purpose. lld's --noinhibit-exec has a different meaning and changes some errors to warnings. This patch replaces "error" with "errorOrWarn" to exploit that property.
We may revisit this: if we should keep them as errors (as ld.bfd/gold do) but allow to produce a (corrupted) executable.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, espindola
Reviewed By: grimar
Subscribers: Timmmm, jhenderson, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54651
llvm-svn: 347327
Remove the default initializer for TrapInstr; all subclasses overwrite
the defaults in their constructors anyway.
This fixes compilation errors like these, with GCC 5.4 on Ubuntu 16.04,
present since SVN r346893:
In file included from ../tools/lld/ELF/Arch/AArch64.cpp:12:0:
../tools/lld/ELF/Target.h:125:49: error: array must be initialized with a brace-enclosed initializer
std::array<uint8_t, 4> TrapInstr = {0, 0, 0, 0};
^
../tools/lld/ELF/Target.h:125:49: error: too many initializers for ‘std::array<unsigned char, 4ul>’
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54569
llvm-svn: 346934
The uint32_t type does not clearly convey that these fields are interpreted
in the target endianness. Converting them to byte arrays should make this
more obvious and less error-prone.
Patch by James Clarke
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D54207
llvm-svn: 346893
Summary:
There are really three different kinds of TLS layouts:
* A fixed TLS-to-TP offset. On architectures like PowerPC, MIPS, and
RISC-V, the thread pointer points to a fixed offset from the start
of the executable's TLS segment. The offset is 0x7000 for PowerPC
and MIPS, which allows a signed 16-bit offset to reach 0x1000 of
per-thread implementation data and 0xf000 of the application's TLS
segment. The size and layout of the TCB isn't relevant to the static
linker and might not be known.
* A fixed TCB size. This is the format documented as "variant 1" in
Ulrich Drepper's TLS spec. The thread pointer points to a 2-word TCB
followed by the executable's TLS segment. The first word is always
the DTV pointer. Used on ARM. The thread pointer must be aligned to
the TLS segment's alignment, possibly creating alignment padding.
* Variant 2. This format predates variant 1 and is also documented in
Drepper's TLS spec. It allocates the executable's TLS segment before
the thread pointer, apparently for backwards-compatibility. It's
used on x86 and SPARC.
Factor out an lld:🧝:getTlsTpOffset() function for use in a
follow-up patch for Android. The TcbSize/TlsTpOffset fields are only used
in getTlsTpOffset, so replace them with a switch on Config->EMachine.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Reviewed By: ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Subscribers: jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, atanasyan, PkmX, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53905
llvm-svn: 345775
Recommitting https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544 after fixing undefined behavior
from left-shifting a negative value. Original commit message:
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
llvm-svn: 344622
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544, which causes failures on
a undefined behaviour sanitizer bot -->
lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp:849:35: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1
llvm-svn: 344551
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52099
llvm-svn: 344544
This is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=38919.
Currently, LLD may report "unsupported relocation target while parsing debug info"
when parsing the debug information.
At the same time LLD does that for zeroed R_X86_64_NONE relocations,
which obviously has "invalid" targets.
The nature of R_*_NONE relocation assumes them should be ignored.
This patch teaches LLD to stop reporting the debug information parsing errors for them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52408
llvm-svn: 343078
The PPC64 elf V2 abi defines 2 entry points for a function. There are a few
places we need to calculate the offset from the global entry to the local entry
and how this is done is not straight forward. This patch adds a helper function
mostly for documentation purposes, explaining how the 2 entry points differ and
why we choose one over the other, as well as documenting how the offsets are
encoded into a functions st_other field.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52231
llvm-svn: 342603
Older Arm architectures do not support the MOVT and MOVW instructions so we
must use an alternative sequence of instructions to transfer control to the
destination.
Assuming at least Armv5 this patch adds support for Thunks that load or add
to the program counter. Note that there are no Armv5 Thumb Thunks as there
is no Thumb branch instruction in Armv5 that supports Thunks. These thunks
will not work for Armv4t (arm7tdmi) as this architecture cannot change state
from using the LDR or ADD instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50077
llvm-svn: 340160
Fangrui Song