Summary: The readme was missing "-" characters to enable links
Patch by Nathan Lanza <nathan@lanza.io>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52069
llvm-svn: 342266
They're not that common, and falling back is definitely
better than throwing an error instead of the result. If we
feel motivated, we might end up implementing support for these,
but it's unclear whether it's worth the effort/complexity.
Fixes PR38925.
<rdar://problem/44436068>
llvm-svn: 342262
Summary:
This patch adds some symbol tag checks before using the `IPDBRawSymbol`
interface to improve safety and readability.
Reviewers: zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51967
llvm-svn: 342208
I started from a clean slate to do the checkin, but forgot to svn add the new files.
Do that now.
Also add the one new source file to CMakeLists.txt
llvm-svn: 342190
This change allows you to write a new breakpoint type where the
logic for setting breakpoints is determined by a Python callback
written using the SB API's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51830
llvm-svn: 342185
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
The two existing implementations have the function implemented
identically, and there's no reason to believe that this would be
different for other implementations.
llvm-svn: 342167
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
After landing r341457, we started seeing a failure on the swift-lldb
bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a DW_OP_constu
was replaced with DW_OP_lit23, the value remaining identical.
0x000000f4: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_location (0x00000000
[0x0000000100000a51, 0x0000000100000d47): DW_OP_lit23, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("number")
However, this broke LLDB.
(Int) number = <extracting data from value failed>
The value was read correctly, but apparently the value's type was different.
When reading a constu it was reading a uint64 (m_type = e_ulonglong) while for
the literal, it got a signed int (m_type = e_sint). This change makes sure we
read the value as an unsigned.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
llvm-svn: 342142
Summary:
Similar to what we did in D50681, we now stop manually byte counting here
in the SourceManager.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50809
llvm-svn: 342121
tests and don't mark this as a failure. This happens when we've
linked against an llvm without the ARM target built in. Davide
added some cmake conditionals to avoid building this test when the
target was absent from llvm's build, but we're still finding some
bots that manage to get in this situation.
<rdar://problem/44270082>
llvm-svn: 342072
Summary:
Building LLDB with xcodebuild sets the compatibility version of liblldb
in LLDB.framework. Building the framework with cmake does not set the
compatibility version, and so it defaults to 0.0.0. This is a discrepency in the
difference between the xcode build and the cmake build.
I tested this change by building without this patch. From the build tree I ran
`otool -L Library/Frameworks/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/LLDB` and got this:
```
@rpath/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/LLDB (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 8.0.0)
```
Did the same with this patch and the output contained this:
```
@rpath/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/LLDB (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 8.0.0)
```
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51959
llvm-svn: 342066
- gcc warning about using binary or for or-ing two comparisons (a == b | a == c)
- llvm style prefers static functions to functions in an anonymous namespace
llvm-svn: 342051
Summary:
One of the conclusions of the discussion on D49740 was that SafeMachO is better
off in the Host module (as that's the only place which should include
mach/machine.h, which is what this header is working around). Also, Utility,
which is the only module which cannot include Host, should not be doing
anything with object file formats.
This patch implements that move, and also removes any unneded includes of that
file.
I've verified that MacOS still compiles after this.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, teemperor
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50383
llvm-svn: 342050
Summary:
This patch removes the manual byte counting in all internal Stream methods.
This is now done by the automatic byte counting provided by calling `GetWrittenBytes()`
before and after writing the data (which is automatically done for us by the `ByteDelta`
utility class).
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50681
llvm-svn: 342044
Summary:
The 'memory region' command is at the moment not tested at all by our test suite.
This patch just adds a basic test that at least provides some basic testing.
Reviewers: #lldb, davide
Reviewed By: #lldb, davide
Subscribers: vsk, davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51930
llvm-svn: 342042
The warning is about heap-allocating a struct with bigger alignment
requirements than the standard heap allocator provides.
AFAICT, all uses of the XSAVE struct are already heap-allocated, so this
high alignment does not actually have any effect and removing it should
be NFC.
I have also done some digging in the commit history. This alignment
requirement was since the XSAVE struct was introduced in r180572 when
adding AVX register support for linux. It does not mention the alignment
specifically, so I am guessing this was just put there because the
corresponging XSAVE cpu instruction requires its buffer to be 64-byte
aligned. However, LLDB will not be normally reading this struct via the
XSAVE instruction directly. Instead we will ask the kernel to copy the
buffer saved when suspeding the inferior. This should not require such
strict alignment (in fact, linux kernel will happily do this for any
alignment).
llvm-svn: 342029
Summary:
This commit fixes following problems after rL341782:
- Broken SymbolFilePDBTests
- Warning on comparison of integers of different signs
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51162
llvm-svn: 341942
Summary:
The check is inverted here: If we have error messages, we should print those instead
of our default error message. But currently we print the default message when we
actually have a sensible error to print.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38383
Thanks Nat for the patch!
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51602
llvm-svn: 341940
The warning is
comparison of integers of different signs: 'const int' and 'const unsigned long'
and triggered by
EXPECT_EQ (num_of_instructions, inst_list.GetSize());
as num_of_instructions is an int in this comparison (and the RHS is size_t).
llvm-svn: 341931
Summary: An address breakpoint of the form "b 0x1000" won't resolve if it's created while the process isn't running. This patch deletes Address::SectionWasDeleted, renames Address::SectionWasDeletedPrivate to SectionWasDeleted (and makes it public), and changes the section check in Breakpoint::ModulesChanged back to its original form
Reviewers: jingham, #lldb
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51816
llvm-svn: 341849
Summary:
This patch adds an implementation of retrieving of declarations and declaration
contexts based on PDB symbols.
PDB has different type symbols for const-qualified types, and this
implementation ensures that only one declaration was created for both const
and non-const types, but creates different compiler types for them.
The implementation also processes the case when there are two symbols
corresponding to a variable. It's possible e.g. for class static variables,
they has one global symbol and one symbol belonging to a class.
PDB has no info about namespaces, so this implementation parses the full symbol
name and tries to figure out if the symbol belongs to namespace or not,
and then creates nested namespaces if necessary.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: asmith
Subscribers: aleksandr.urakov, teemperor, lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51162
llvm-svn: 341782
This recommits r341487, which was reverted due to failing tests with
clang. It turned out I had incorrectly expected that the literal arrays
passed to ArrayRef constructor will have static (permanent) storage.
This was only the case with gcc, while clang was constructing them on
stack, leading to dangling pointers when the function returns.
The fix is to explicitly assign static storage duration to the opcode
arrays.
llvm-svn: 341758
Summary:
Previously we SetUseColor(true) wrongly when output was not a terminal so it broken some (not public) bots.
Thanks for issue report, @stella.stamenova
Reviewers: stella.stamenova, zturner
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51772
llvm-svn: 341746
In a subsequent commit, I will need to expose the search depth
to the SB API's, so I'm moving this define into lldb-enumerations
where it will get added to the lldb module.
llvm-svn: 341690
This showed up in an Ubsan build of lldb (inside the CFAbsoluteTime
data formatter). As we only care about the bit pattern, we just
round to the nearest double, and truncate to a size that fits
in ulonglong_t.
<rdar://problem/44229924>
llvm-svn: 341682
code. This will enable disassembly of the optional subset of
neon that some Cortex cores support. Add a unit test to check
that a few of these instructions disassemble as expected.
<rdar://problem/26674303>
llvm-svn: 341623
The GetLanguageForExpr has side effects, so we can't remove this
call without breaking the completion mechanism. However, we can
keep the change that gets rid of this unnecessary variable.
llvm-svn: 341535
Davide Italiano