codesign/libstuff checks that the `__LLVM` segment is directly
before `__LINKEDIT` by checking that `fileOff + fileSize == next segment
fileOff`. Previously, there would be gaps between the segments due to
the fact that their fileOffs are page-aligned but their fileSizes
aren't. In order to satisfy codesign, we page-align fileOff *before*
calculating fileSize. (I don't think codesign checks for the relative
ordering of other segments, so in theory we could do this just for
`__LLVM`, but ld64 seems to do it for all segments.)
Note that we *don't* round up the fileSize of the `__LINKEDIT` segment.
Since it's the last segment, it doesn't need to worry about contiguity;
in addition, codesign checks that the last (hidden) section in
`__LINKEDIT` covers the last byte of the segment, so if we rounded up
`__LINKEDIT`'s size we would have to do the same for its last section,
which is a bother.
While at it, I also addressed a FIXME in the linkedit-contiguity.s test
to cover more `__LINKEDIT` sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100848
We were mishandling the case where both `__tbss` and `__thread_data` sections were
present.
TLVP relocations should be encoded as offsets from the start of `__thread_data`,
even if the symbol is actually located in `__thread_bss`. Previously, we were
writing the offset from the start of the containing section, which doesn't
really make sense since there's no way `tlv_get_addr()` can know which section a
given `tlv$init` symbol is in at runtime.
In addition, this patch ensures that we place `__thread_data` immediately before
`__thread_bss`. This is what ld64 does, likely for performance reasons. Zerofill
sections must also be at the end of their segments; we were already doing this,
but now we ensure that `__thread_bss` occurs before `__bss`, so that it's always
possible to have it contiguous with `__thread_data`.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48657.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94329
This diff makes the behavior in {D80859} and {D81888} apply to
thread-local ZeroFill sections too. I realized this was necessary whie
trying to implement thread-local variables.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85079
Summary:
ld64 does this, and references an internal rdar:// number as an explanation. No
idea what that rdar issue is, but in practice, it seems that not putting a BSS
section at the end can cause subsequent sections in the same segment to be
overwritten with zeroes.
Reviewers: #lld-macho
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81888
Summary:
llvm-mc emits `__bss` sections with an offset of zero, but we weren't expecting
that in our input, so we were copying non-zero data from the start of the file and
putting it in `__bss`, with obviously undesirable runtime results. (It appears that
the kernel will copy those nonzero bytes as long as the offset is nonzero, regardless
of whether S_ZERO_FILL is set.)
I debated on whether to make a special ZeroFillSection -- separate from a
regular InputSection -- but it seemed like too much work for now. But I'm happy
to refactor if anyone feels strongly about having it as a separate class.
Depends on D80857.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80859
Jez Ng