tco is a tool to test the FIR to LLVM IR pipeline of the Flang compiler.
This patch update tco pipelines and adds the translation to LLVM IR.
A simple test is added to make sure the tool is working with a simple
FIR program.
More tests will be upstream in follow up patch from the fir-dev branch.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, awarzynski, schweitz, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117781
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
This change was suggested in one of the comments for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115333. Basically, the following usage is
valid, but the current wording suggests otherwise:
```
%1 = fir.coordinate_of %a, %k : (!fir.ref<!fir.array<10 x 10 x i32>>, index) -> !fir.ref<!fir.array<10 x i32>>
```
A test is also added to better document this particular case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115929
tco is a tool to test the FIR to LLVM IR pipeline of the Flang compiler.
This patch update tco pipelines and adds the translation to LLVM IR.
A simple test is added to make sure the tool is working with a simple
FIR program.
More tests will be upstream in follow up patch from the fir-dev branch.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: schweitz, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117781
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
The intrinsic table entry for INDEX mistakenly required
the optional BACK= argument to be scalar, but it's an
elemental intrinsic that can accept a conforming array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117700
Accept any keyword argument names of the form "An" for
values of n >= 3 in calls to the intrinsic functions MAX, MIN,
and their variants, so long as "n" has no leading zero and
all the keywords are distinct. Previously, f18 was needlessly
requiring the names to be contiguous. When synthesizing keywords
to characterize the procedure's interface, don't conflict with
the program's keywords.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117701
Consistent with previously documented policy, in which
BOZ literals are accepted in non-standard-conforming circumstances
where they can be converted to an unambiguous known numeric type,
allow BOZ literals to be passed as an actual argument in a reference
to a procedure whose explicit interface has a corresponding dummy
argument with a numeric type to which the BOZ literal may be
converted. Improve error messages associated with BOZ literal
actual arguments, too: don't emit multiple errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117698
When variable with the SAVE attribute appears in a pure subprogram,
emit a more specialized error message if the SAVE attribute was acquired
from static initialization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117699
UBOUND, SIZE, and SHAPE folding was still creating expressions that are
invalid on the caller side without the call expression context.
A previous patch intended to deal with this situation (https://reviews.llvm.org/D116933)
but it assumed the return expression would be a descriptor inquiry to
the result symbol, which is not the case if the extent expression is
"scope invariant" inside the called subroutine (e.g., referring to
intent(in) dummy arguments). Simply prevent folding from inlining non
constant extent expression on the caller side.
Folding could be later improved by having ad-hoc folding for UBOUND, SIZE, and
SHAPE on function references where it could try replacing the dummy symbols
by the actual expression, but this is left as a possible later improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117686
Subclause 7.5.2.4 lists conditions under which two distinct derived
types are to be considered the same type for purposes of argument
association, assignment, and so on. These conditions are implemented
in evaluate::IsTkCompatibleWith(), but assignment semantics doesn't
use it for testing for intrinsic assignment compatibility. Fix that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117621
When a scalar-valued function with no distinct RESULT
is being called recursively in its own executable part,
emit a better message about the error. Clean up the
code that resolves function vs. array ambiguities in
expression semantics.
Update to address review comment
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117577
Fold references to the intrinsic function SCALE().
(Also work around some MSVC headaches somehow exposed by
this patch: disable a bogus MSVC warning that began to appear
in unrelated source files, and avoid the otherwise-necessary
use of the "template" keyword in a call to a template member
function of a class template.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117150
Character substrings weren't being folded correctly;
add tests and rework the implementation so that substrings
of literals and named constant character scalars & arrays
are properly folded for use in constant expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117343
ENTRY statement names in module subprograms were not acceptable for
use as a "module procedure" in a generic interface, but should be.
ENTRY statements need to have symbols with place-holding
SubprogramNameDetails created for them in order to be visible in
generic interfaces. Those symbols are created from the "program
tree" data structure. This patch adds ENTRY statement names to the
program tree data structure and uses them to generate SubprogramNameDetails
symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117345
Very old (pre-'77 standard) codes would use arrays initialized
with Hollerith literals, typically in DATA, as modifiable
formats.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117344
Derived types with SEQUENCE must have data components of sequence
types; but this rule is relaxed as common an extension in the case of
pointer components, whose targets' types are not really relevant
to the implementation requirements of sequence types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117158
It's not conforming to specify the SAVE attribute more than
once for a variable, but it also doesn't hurt anything and
isn't fatal in other Fortran compilers. Downgrade the
message to a warning for better portability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117153
This is nonconformant usage, but widely accepted as an extension.
Downgrade the error message to a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117152
We already accept assignments of INTEGER to LOGICAL (& vice versa)
as an extension, but not initialization. Extend initialization
to cover those cases.
(Also fix misspelling in nearby comment as suggested by code reviewer.)
Decouple an inadvertent dependence cycle by moving two
one-line function definitions into a header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117159
Implements part of the legacy "DEC structures" feature from
VMS Fortran. STRUCTUREs are processed as if they were derived
types with SEQUENCE. DATA-like object entity initialization
is supported as well (e.g., INTEGER FOO/666/) since it was used
for default component initialization in structures. Anonymous
components (named %FILL) are also supported.
These features, and UNION/MAP, were already being parsed.
An omission in the collection of structure field names in the
case of nested structures with entity declarations was fixed
in the parser.
Structures are supported in modules, but this is mostly for
testing purposes. The names of fields in structures accessed
via USE association cannot appear with dot notation in client
code (at least not yet). DEC structures antedate Fortran 90,
so their actual use in applications should not involve modules.
This patch does not implement UNION/MAP, since that feature
would impose difficulties later in lowering them to MLIR types.
In the meantime, if they appear, semantics will issue a
"not yet implemented" error message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117151
A bogus error message is appearing for structure constructors containing
values that correspond to unlimited polymorphic allocatable components.
A value of any type can actually be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117154
When preprocessing "# ARG" in function-like macro expansion,
the preprocessor needs to pop the previously-pushed '#' token
from the end of the resulting token sequence after detecting the
argument name. The code to do this was just wrong in a couple of
ways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117148
When converting a fir.alloca of an array to the LLVM dialect, we used to
multiply the allocated size by all the constant factors encoded in the
array type. This is fine when the array type is converted to the element
type for the purposes of the allocation, but if it's converted to an
array type, then we might be allocating too much space. For example, for
`%2 = fir.alloca !fir.array<8x16x32xf32>, %0, %1` we would allocate
%0 * %1 * 8 * 16 * 32 x llvm.array<32 x array<16 * array<8 x f32>>>. We
really only need to allocate %0 * %1 such arrays.
This patch fixes the issue by taking note of the array type that we're
trying to allocate. It tries to match the behaviour of
LLVMTypeConverter::convertPointerLike, which returns a pointer to the
element type only when the array type doesn't have a constant interior.
We consequently only multiply with the constant factors in the array
type if the array type doesn't have a constant interior.
This has the nice side effect that it gets rid of some redundant
multiplications with the constant 1 in some cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116926
Cover more of the code paths from LLVMTypeConverter::convertPointerLike
and LLVMTypeConverter::convertSequenceType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116927
Currently, something like `print *, size(foo(n,m))` was rewritten
to `print *, size(foo_result_symbol)` when foo result is a non constant
shape array. This cannot be processed by lowering or reprocessed by a
Fortran compiler since the syntax is wrong (`foo_result_symbol` is
unknown on the caller side) and the arguments are lost when they might
be required to compute the result shape.
It is not possible (and probably not desired) to make GetShape fail in
general in such case since returning nullopt seems only expected for
scalars or assumed rank (see GetRank usage in lib/Semantics/check-call.cpp),
and returning a vector with nullopt extent may trigger some checks to
believe they are facing an assumed size (like here in intrinsic argument
checks: 196204c72c/flang/lib/Evaluate/intrinsics.cpp (L1530)).
Hence, I went for a solution that limits the rewrite change to folding
(where the original expression is returned if the shape depends on a non
constant shape from a call).
I added a non default option to GetShapeHelper that prevents the rewrite
of shape inquiry on calls to descriptor inquiries. At first I wanted to
avoid touching GetShapeHelper, but it would require to re-implement all
its logic to determine if the shape comes from a function call or not
(the expression could be `size(1+foo(n,m))`). So added an alternate
entry point to GetShapeHelper seemed the cleanest solution to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116933
This supports the following checks for THREADPRIVATE Directive:
```
[5.1] 2.21.2 THREADPRIVATE Directive
A threadprivate variable must not appear in any clause except the
copyin, copyprivate, schedule, num_threads, thread_limit, and if clauses.
```
This supports the following checks for DECLARE TARGET Directive:
```
[5.1] 2.14.7 Declare Target Directive
A threadprivate variable cannot appear in the directive.
```
Besides, procedure name and the entity with PARAMETER attribute cannot
be in the threadprivate directive. The main program name and module name
cannot be in the threadprivate directive and declare target directive.
There is no clear description or restriction about the entity with
PARAMETER attribute in OpenMP 5.1 Specification, and a warning is given.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, shraiysh, NimishMishra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114941
F18 constraint C1308 is:
For the G edit descriptor, e shall not be specified if w is zero.
For an edit descriptor such as 'G0.2E4', change the error message from:
error: Unexpected 'e' in 'G0' edit descriptor
To:
error: A 'G0' edit descriptor must not have an 'e' value
Uses the recursive type conversion implemented in D113579, D113580.
Tests check for recursive and mutually recursive types.
Note: The downstream implementation for recursive types is a bit old
and is based on a static map. This was removed while upstreaming
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D112961) based on review comments. Since
the recursive type conversion is now available in MLIR we are using
that. If this patch is accepted we can use the same in the downstream
implementation.
Part of upstreaming flang from fir-dev branch of https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115937
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Test a range of acceptable forms of co_max calls, including
combinations of keyword and non-keyword actual arguments of
numeric types. Also test that several invalid forms of
co_max call generate the correct error messages.
Reviewed By: ktras
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113083
Test various acceptable forms of co_min calls, including
combinations of keyword and non-keyword actual arguments of
integer, real, and character types. Also test that several
invalid forms of co_min call generate the correct error messages.
Reviewed By: ktras
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113077
Test a range of acceptable forms of co_reduce calls, including
combinations of keyword and non-keyword actual arguments of
numeric types. Also test that several invalid forms of
co_reduce call generate the correct error messages.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, ktras, ekieri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113086
This patch extends the `FIRToLLVMLowering` pass in Flang by extending
the hook to transform `fir.coordinate_of` into a sequence of LLVM MLIR
instructions (i.e. `CoordinateOpConversion::doRewrite`). The following
case is added:
3.1 the input object is inside `!fir.ref` (e.g. `!fir.ref<!fir.array>` or
`!fir.ref<!fir.type>`).
3.2 the input object is inside `!fir.ptr` (e.g. `!fir.ptr<!fir.array>` or
`!fir.ptr<!fir.type>`).
From the point of view of the conversion, 3.1 and 3.2 are currently identical.
This is part of the upstreaming effort from the `fir-dev` branch in [1].
[1] https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project
Originally written by:
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: V Donaldson <vdonaldson@nvidia.com>
Depends on: D114159
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115333
With this change, the following invocations will be treated as errors
(multiple actions are specified):
```
$ flang-new -fc1 -E -fsyntax-only file.95
$ flang-new -fc1 -fsyntax-only -fdebug-dump-symbols file.95
```
In the examples above it is not clear whether it is `-fsyntax-only` or
the other action that is run (i.e. `-E` or `-fdebug-dump-symbols`). It
makes sense to disallow such usage. This should also lead to cleaner and
clearer tests (the `RUN` lines using `%flang_fc1` will only allow one
action).
This change means that `flang-new -fc1` and `clang -cc1` will behave
differently when multiple action options are specified. As frontend
drivers are mostly used by compiler developers, this shouldn't affect or
confuse the compiler end-users. Also, `flang-new` and `clang` remain
consistent.
Tests are updated accordingly. More specifically, I've made sure that
every test specifies only one action. I've also taken the opportunity to
simplify "multiple-input-files.f90" a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111781
This pass can reclassify memory allocations (fir.alloca, fir.allocmem)
based on heuristics and settings. The intention is to allow better
performance and workarounds for conditions such as environments with
limited stack space.
Currently, implements two conversions from stack to heap allocation.
1. If a stack allocation is an array larger than some threshold value
make it a heap allocation.
2. If a stack allocation is an array with a runtime evaluated size make
it a heap allocation.
Add a lit test for both suboptions.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld, vdonaldson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115763
This patch extends the `FIRToLLVMLowering` pass in Flang by adding a
hook to transform `!fir.coordinate_of` into a sequence of LLVM MLIR
instructions.
The following cases are currently supported:
1. the input object is a `!fir.complex` (wrapped in e.g. `!fir.ref` or
`!fir.box`)
2. the input object is wrapped in a `!fir.box` (including e.g.
`!fir.array`).
Note that `!fir.complex` inside a `!fir.box` falls under case 1. above
(i.e. it's a special case regardless of the wrapping type).
This is part of the upstreaming effort from the `!fir-dev` branch in [1].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114159
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: V Donaldson <vdonaldson@nvidia.com>
Array constructors with implied DO loops that oversee structure
constructors were being prematurely folded into invalid constants
containing symbolic references to the ac-implied-do indices,
because they are indeed "constant expressions" as that term is
used in the Fortran standard and implemented as IsConstantExpr().
What's actually needed in structure constructor folding is a
test for actual constant values, which is what results from
folding them later with repetition in the context of folding
an ac-implied-do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115470
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from the fir-dev branch.
Address review comments
- move CHECK blocks to after the mlir code in the test file
- fix style with respect to anonymous namespaces: only include class definitions in the namespace and make functions static and outside the namespace
- fix a few nits
- remove TODO in favor of notifyMatchFailure
- removed unnecessary CHECK line from convert-to-llvm.fir
- rebase on main - add TODO back in
- get successfull test of TODO in AllocMemOp converion of derived type with LEN params
- clearer comments and reduced use of auto
- move defintion of computeDerivedTypeSize to fix build error
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Reviewed By: awarzynski, clementval, kiranchandramohan, schweitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114104
The XRebox Op is formed by the codegen rewrite which makes it easier to
convert the operation to LLVM. The XRebox op includes the information
from the rebox op and the associated slice, shift, and shape ops.
During the conversion process a new descriptor is created for reboxing.
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Val Donaldson <vdonaldson@nvidia.com>
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114709
This patch adds the conversion pattern for the fircg.ext_array_coor
operation. It applies the address arithmetic on a dynamically shaped, shifted
and/or sliced array.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113968
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
The definition of the EXPONENT() intrinsic function differs by one
from the real arithmetic folding templates concept of an unbiased
exponent, and also needs special handling for zero. Fix, and add
more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115084
Rewrite AddrOfOp if taking the address of a function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114925
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Valentin Clement