Commit Graph

271263 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 309b7f5d77 [Sema] Put tautological comparison of unsigned and zero into it's own flag
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall.

```
$ /build/llvm-build-Clang-release/./bin/clang -c /build/clang/test/Sema/outof-range-constant-compare.c /build/clang/test/Sema/outof-range-constant-compare.c:40:11: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare]
    if (a < 0x0000000000000000UL) // expected-warning {{comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false}}
        ~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```

Reviewers: sammccall, bkramer, djasper, rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman

Reviewed By: sammccall, aaron.ballman

Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37620

llvm-svn: 312792
2017-09-08 13:56:45 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 6dd29fccb8 [SLP] Support for horizontal min/max reduction.
SLP vectorizer supports horizontal reductions for Add/FAdd binary
operations. Patch adds support for horizontal min/max reductions.
Function getReductionCost() is split to getArithmeticReductionCost() for
binary operation reductions and getMinMaxReductionCost() for min/max
reductions.
Patch fixes PR26956.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27846

llvm-svn: 312791
2017-09-08 13:49:36 +00:00
Krasimir Georgiev 46dfb7a39d Updated two annotations for Store.h and CodeGenFunction.h.
Summary:
1.Updated annotations for include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Store.h, which belong to the old version of clang.
2.Delete annotations for CodeGenFunction::getEvaluationKind() in clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h, which belong to the old version of clang.

Reviewers: bkramer, krasimir, klimek

Reviewed By: bkramer

Subscribers: MTC

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36330

Contributed by @MTC!

llvm-svn: 312790
2017-09-08 13:44:51 +00:00
George Rimar 9a2da39837 [ELF] - Simplify #2. NFC.
llvm-svn: 312789
2017-09-08 13:40:07 +00:00
Ilya Biryukov cbea95dd95 Fixed a crash in code completion.
Summary: The crash occured when FunctionDecl was parsed with an initializer.

Reviewers: bkramer, klimek, francisco.lopes

Reviewed By: bkramer

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37382

llvm-svn: 312788
2017-09-08 13:36:38 +00:00
George Rimar 7ac3825afb [ELF] - Simplify. NFC.
llvm-svn: 312787
2017-09-08 13:26:45 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 2e4fb24173 [X86] Added PR31045 test case
Reduced version of 'addr-calc-crash.ll' that was included in D27044, that had been fixed already by D31286/rL298633

llvm-svn: 312786
2017-09-08 10:49:11 +00:00
Erik Verbruggen 7ec9107fdc Don't show deleted function (constructor) candidates for code completion
In case of copy constructor is implicitly deleted it's still shown.
PR34402 describes a way to reproduce that.

Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37435

llvm-svn: 312785
2017-09-08 10:23:08 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer 9aeedde7ff Revert "Add _Float16 as a C/C++ source language type"
The clang-with-lto-ubuntu bot didn't like the new regression
test, revert while I investigate the issue.

llvm-svn: 312784
2017-09-08 10:20:52 +00:00
Max Kazantsev d7b0f74c64 Re-enable "[IRCE] Identify loops with latch comparison against current IV value"
Re-applying after the found bug was fixed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36215

llvm-svn: 312783
2017-09-08 10:15:05 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere f4ed65da04 [dwarfdump] Verify line table prologue
This patch adds prologue verification, which is already present in
Apple's dwarfdump. It checks for invalid directory indices and warns
about duplicate file paths.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37511

llvm-svn: 312782
2017-09-08 09:48:51 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer ab36f33db8 Add _Float16 as a C/C++ source language type
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.

In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719

llvm-svn: 312781
2017-09-08 09:42:32 +00:00
Erik Verbruggen 51ee12a9fb Fix templated type alias completion when using global completion cache
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.

template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };

template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;

int main() {
   Ba
}

(This is the fixed version of r 311442, which was reverted in r311445.)

Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355

llvm-svn: 312780
2017-09-08 09:31:13 +00:00
George Rimar 113a5ca029 [ELF] - Simplify and improve symbols.s testcase.
There is no need to check anything excepr that
symbol is not in output.
Previously additional iformation like symbol values
or flags were checked, that was not correct.
For example if we would provide symbol with different
value/visibility/type for case when should not provide 
symbol at all, testcase would not fail.

llvm-svn: 312779
2017-09-08 09:31:01 +00:00
Jatin Bhateja a251312719 [X86] Adding a test point for PR34149 'Suboptimal codegen for "fast" minnum and maxnum'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37614

llvm-svn: 312778
2017-09-08 09:15:36 +00:00
George Rimar 5f37541c73 [ELF] - Linkerscript: implement REGION_ALIAS.
REGION_ALIAS(alias, region)

Alias names can be added to existing memory regions created with
the MEMORY command. Each name corresponds to at most one
memory region.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37477

llvm-svn: 312777
2017-09-08 08:23:15 +00:00
Martin Storsjo d085200a11 [llvm-dlltool] Mention arm64 in the lists of architecture alternatives
This was missed in SVN r310223 when arm64 support was added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37588

llvm-svn: 312776
2017-09-08 06:49:46 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 57db44838d diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
index f72a808..9fa49fd 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
@@ -450,20 +450,10 @@ struct LoopStructure {
   // equivalent to:
   //
   // intN_ty inc = IndVarIncreasing ? 1 : -1;
-  // pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing
-  //                         ? IsSignedPredicate ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_ULT
-  //                         : IsSignedPredicate ? ICMP_SGT : ICMP_UGT;
+  // pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_SGT;
   //
-  //
-  // for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(IndVarBase, LoopExitAt);
-  //      iv = IndVarNext)
+  // for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(iv, LoopExitAt); iv = IndVarBase)
   //   ... body ...
-  //
-  // Here IndVarBase is either current or next value of the induction variable.
-  // in the former case, IsIndVarNext = false and IndVarBase points to the
-  // Phi node of the induction variable. Otherwise, IsIndVarNext = true and
-  // IndVarBase points to IV increment instruction.
-  //
 
   Value *IndVarBase;
   Value *IndVarStart;
@@ -471,13 +461,12 @@ struct LoopStructure {
   Value *LoopExitAt;
   bool IndVarIncreasing;
   bool IsSignedPredicate;
-  bool IsIndVarNext;
 
   LoopStructure()
       : Tag(""), Header(nullptr), Latch(nullptr), LatchBr(nullptr),
         LatchExit(nullptr), LatchBrExitIdx(-1), IndVarBase(nullptr),
         IndVarStart(nullptr), IndVarStep(nullptr), LoopExitAt(nullptr),
-        IndVarIncreasing(false), IsSignedPredicate(true), IsIndVarNext(false) {}
+        IndVarIncreasing(false), IsSignedPredicate(true) {}
 
   template <typename M> LoopStructure map(M Map) const {
     LoopStructure Result;
@@ -493,7 +482,6 @@ struct LoopStructure {
     Result.LoopExitAt = Map(LoopExitAt);
     Result.IndVarIncreasing = IndVarIncreasing;
     Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
-    Result.IsIndVarNext = IsIndVarNext;
     return Result;
   }
 
@@ -841,42 +829,21 @@ LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE,
     return false;
   };
 
-  // `ICI` can either be a comparison against IV or a comparison of IV.next.
-  // Depending on the interpretation, we calculate the start value differently.
+  // `ICI` is interpreted as taking the backedge if the *next* value of the
+  // induction variable satisfies some constraint.
 
-  // Pair {IndVarBase; IsIndVarNext} semantically designates whether the latch
-  // comparisons happens against the IV before or after its value is
-  // incremented. Two valid combinations for them are:
-  //
-  // 1) { phi [ iv.start, preheader ], [ iv.next, latch ]; false },
-  // 2) { iv.next; true }.
-  //
-  // The latch comparison happens against IndVarBase which can be either current
-  // or next value of the induction variable.
   const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVarBase = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV);
   bool IsIncreasing = false;
   bool IsSignedPredicate = true;
-  bool IsIndVarNext = false;
   ConstantInt *StepCI;
   if (!IsInductionVar(IndVarBase, IsIncreasing, StepCI)) {
     FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable";
     return None;
   }
 
-  const SCEV *IndVarStart = nullptr;
-  // TODO: Currently we only handle comparison against IV, but we can extend
-  // this analysis to be able to deal with comparison against sext(iv) and such.
-  if (isa<PHINode>(LeftValue) &&
-      cast<PHINode>(LeftValue)->getParent() == Header)
-    // The comparison is made against current IV value.
-    IndVarStart = IndVarBase->getStart();
-  else {
-    // Assume that the comparison is made against next IV value.
-    const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart();
-    const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE));
-    IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend);
-    IsIndVarNext = true;
-  }
+  const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart();
+  const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE));
+  const SCEV *IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend);
   const SCEV *Step = SE.getSCEV(StepCI);
 
   ConstantInt *One = ConstantInt::get(IndVarTy, 1);
@@ -1060,7 +1027,6 @@ LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE,
   Result.IndVarIncreasing = IsIncreasing;
   Result.LoopExitAt = RightValue;
   Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
-  Result.IsIndVarNext = IsIndVarNext;
 
   FailureReason = nullptr;
 
@@ -1350,9 +1316,8 @@ LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo LoopConstrainer::changeIterationSpaceEnd(
                                       BranchToContinuation);
 
     NewPHI->addIncoming(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(Preheader), Preheader);
-    auto *FixupValue =
-        LS.IsIndVarNext ? PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch) : PN;
-    NewPHI->addIncoming(FixupValue, RRI.ExitSelector);
+    NewPHI->addIncoming(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch),
+                        RRI.ExitSelector);
     RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit.push_back(NewPHI);
   }
 
@@ -1735,10 +1700,7 @@ bool InductiveRangeCheckElimination::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
   }
   LoopStructure LS = MaybeLoopStructure.getValue();
   const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar =
-      cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase));
-  if (LS.IsIndVarNext)
-    IndVar = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(IndVar,
-                                                  SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep)));
+      cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase), SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep)));
 
   Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> SafeIterRange;
   Instruction *ExprInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
diff --git a/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll b/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index afea0e6..0000000
--- a/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,182 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: opt -verify-loop-info -irce-print-changed-loops -irce -S < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-
-; Check that IRCE is able to deal with loops where the latch comparison is
-; done against current value of the IV, not the IV.next.
-
-; CHECK: irce: in function test_01: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK: irce: in function test_02: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_03: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_04: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-
-; SLT condition for increasing loop from 0 to 100.
-define void @test_01(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_01
-; CHECK:        entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %exit.mainloop.at = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND2:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 0, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND2]], label %loop.preheader, label %main.pseudo.exit
-; CHECK:        loop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next = add nuw nsw i32 %idx, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 true, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit1
-; CHECK:        in.bounds:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-; CHECK-NEXT:     store i32 0, i32* %addr
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND3:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND3]], label %loop, label %main.exit.selector
-; CHECK:        main.exit.selector:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.lcssa = phi i32 [ %idx, %in.bounds ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND4:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 %idx.lcssa, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND4]], label %main.pseudo.exit, label %exit
-; CHECK-NOT: loop.preloop:
-; CHECK:        loop.postloop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %idx.postloop = phi i32 [ %idx.copy, %postloop ], [ %idx.next.postloop, %in.bounds.postloop ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next.postloop = add nuw nsw i32 %idx.postloop, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc.postloop = icmp slt i32 %idx.postloop, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 %abc.postloop, label %in.bounds.postloop, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; ULT condition for increasing loop from 0 to 100.
-define void @test_02(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_02
-; CHECK:        entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %exit.mainloop.at = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND2:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 0, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND2]], label %loop.preheader, label %main.pseudo.exit
-; CHECK:        loop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next = add nuw nsw i32 %idx, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc = icmp ult i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 true, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit1
-; CHECK:        in.bounds:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-; CHECK-NEXT:     store i32 0, i32* %addr
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND3:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND3]], label %loop, label %main.exit.selector
-; CHECK:        main.exit.selector:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.lcssa = phi i32 [ %idx, %in.bounds ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND4:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 %idx.lcssa, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND4]], label %main.pseudo.exit, label %exit
-; CHECK-NOT: loop.preloop:
-; CHECK:        loop.postloop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %idx.postloop = phi i32 [ %idx.copy, %postloop ], [ %idx.next.postloop, %in.bounds.postloop ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next.postloop = add nuw nsw i32 %idx.postloop, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc.postloop = icmp ult i32 %idx.postloop, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 %abc.postloop, label %in.bounds.postloop, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %abc = icmp ult i32 %idx, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; Same as test_01, but comparison happens against IV extended to a wider type.
-; This test ensures that IRCE rejects it and does not falsely assume that it was
-; a comparison against iv.next.
-; TODO: We can actually extend the recognition to cover this case.
-define void @test_03(i32* %arr, i64* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_03
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i64, i64* %a_len_ptr, !range !1
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %idx.ext = sext i32 %idx to i64
-  %abc = icmp slt i64 %idx.ext, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; Same as test_02, but comparison happens against IV extended to a wider type.
-; This test ensures that IRCE rejects it and does not falsely assume that it was
-; a comparison against iv.next.
-; TODO: We can actually extend the recognition to cover this case.
-define void @test_04(i32* %arr, i64* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_04
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i64, i64* %a_len_ptr, !range !1
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %idx.ext = sext i32 %idx to i64
-  %abc = icmp ult i64 %idx.ext, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-!0 = !{i32 0, i32 50}
-!1 = !{i64 0, i64 50}

llvm-svn: 312775
2017-09-08 04:26:41 +00:00
Brian Cain 086b6682dd XFAIL tests on SLES11
XFAIL some failing tests for SLES11 (older glibc), also replace spaces
in linux distro w/dashes.

llvm-svn: 312774
2017-09-08 03:57:02 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 99ba97726a Fix a crash when emitting debug info for multi-reg function arguments
by reusing more of the existing machinery

This is a follow-up to r312169.
Thanks to Björn Pettersson for the testcase!

llvm-svn: 312773
2017-09-08 02:31:37 +00:00
Dean Michael Berris 711dec260f [XRay][CodeGen][PowerPC] Fix tail exit codegen for XRay in PPC
Summary:
This fixes code-gen for XRay in PPC. The regression wasn't caught by
codegen tests  which we add in this change.

What happened was the following:

- For tail exits, we used to unconditionally prepend the returns/exits
  with a pseudo-instruction that gets lowered to the instrumentation
  sled (and leave the actual return/exit instruction as-is).
- Changes to the XRay instrumentation pass caused the tail exits to
  suddenly also emit the tail exit pseudo-instruction, since the check
  for whether a return instruction was also a call instruction meant it
  was a tail exit instruction.
- None of the tests caught the regression either due to non-existent
  tests, or the tests being disabled/removed for continuous breakage.

This change re-introduces some of the basic tests and verifies that
we're back to a state that allows the back-end to generate appropriate
XRay instrumented binaries for PPC in the presence of tail exits.

Reviewers: echristo, timshen

Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37570

llvm-svn: 312772
2017-09-08 01:47:56 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 0ff545c018 Revert "Revert "Revert r311468: If --dynamic-list is given, only those symbols are preemptible""
This reverts commit r312757.

Evgenii Stepanov reports that it broke some tests.

llvm-svn: 312771
2017-09-08 01:09:52 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 052e855e2b COFF: Implement ThinLTO cache and cache pruning support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37607

llvm-svn: 312770
2017-09-08 00:50:50 +00:00
Rafael Espindola d63b2f3996 Update for PrintHelpMessage not calling exit.
llvm-svn: 312769
2017-09-08 00:33:39 +00:00
Chandler Carruth acbcf06f03 [x86] Flesh out the custom ISel for RMW aritmetic ops with used flags to
cover the bitwise operators.

Nothing really exciting here, this just stamps out the rest of the core
operations that can RMW memory and set flags.

Still not implemented here: ADC, SBB. Those will require more
interesting logic to channel the flags *in*, and I'm not currently
planning to try to tackle that. It might be interesting for someone who
wants to improve our code generation for bignum implementations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37141

llvm-svn: 312768
2017-09-08 00:17:12 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 88a58cf9e7 WholeProgramDevirt: When promoting for single-impl devirt, also rename the comdat.
This is required when targeting COFF, as the comdat name must match
one of the names of the symbols in the comdat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37550

llvm-svn: 312767
2017-09-08 00:10:53 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 79d9a6964d Update for llvm change.
llvm-svn: 312766
2017-09-08 00:01:26 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 721b71d532 Replace CRLF.
llvm-svn: 312765
2017-09-07 23:54:32 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 52a31bf268 [x86] Extend the manual ISel of `add` and `sub` with both RMW memory
operands and used flags to support matching immediate operands.

This is a bit trickier than register operands, and we still want to fall
back on a register operands even for things that appear to be
"immediates" when they won't actually select into the operation's
immediate operand. This also requires us to handle things like selecting
`sub` vs. `add` to minimize the number of bits needed to represent the
immediate, and picking the shortest immediate encoding. In order to
that, we in turn need to scan to make sure that CF isn't used as it will
get inverted.

The end result seems very nice though, and we're now generating
optimal instruction sequences for these patterns IMO.

A follow-up patch will further expand this to other operations with RMW
memory operands. But handing `add` and `sub` are useful starting points
to flesh out the machinery and make sure interesting and complex cases
can be handled.

Thanks to Craig Topper who provided a few fixes and improvements to this
patch in addition to the review!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37139

llvm-svn: 312764
2017-09-07 23:54:24 +00:00
Rui Ueyama d63ac33948 Remove a stale comment.
llvm-svn: 312763
2017-09-07 23:54:20 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne cef809938d COFF: Remove unnecessary casts. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 312762
2017-09-07 23:49:09 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 39c150eecb Don't call exit from cl::PrintHelpMessage.
Most callers were not expecting the exit(0) and trying to exit with a
different value.

This also adds back the call to cl::PrintHelpMessage in llvm-ar.

llvm-svn: 312761
2017-09-07 23:30:48 +00:00
Eugene Zelenko 975293f0e5 [Bitcode] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize-use-using and Include What You Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 312760
2017-09-07 23:28:24 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 0e8c4bb055 Sink some IntrinsicInst.h and Intrinsics.h out of llvm/include
Many of these uses can get by with forward declarations. Hopefully this
speeds up compilation after adding a single intrinsic.

llvm-svn: 312759
2017-09-07 23:27:44 +00:00
Richard Trieu c7828ebea4 Revert r312318, r312325, r312424, r312489
r312318 - Debug info for variables whose type is shrinked to bool
r312325, r312424, r312489 - Test case for r312318

Revision 312318 introduced a null dereference bug.
Details in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34490

llvm-svn: 312758
2017-09-07 23:20:35 +00:00
Rafael Espindola b7d0be5896 Revert "Revert r311468: If --dynamic-list is given, only those symbols are preemptible"
If --dynamic-list is given, only those symbols are preemptible.

This allows combining --dynamic-list and version scripts too. The
version script controls which symbols are visible, and --dynamic-list
controls which of those are preemptible.

This fixes pr34053.

llvm-svn: 312757
2017-09-07 23:19:09 +00:00
Petr Hosek ec2b3fce1b [llvm-objcopy] Add support for special section indexes in symbol table greater than SHN_LORESERVE
As is indexes above SHN_LORESERVE will not be handled correctly because
they'll be treated as indexes of sections rather than special values
that should just be copied. This change adds support to copy them
though.

Patch by Jake Ehrlich

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37393

llvm-svn: 312756
2017-09-07 23:02:50 +00:00
Reid Kleckner b79e7a6897 Fix some unused warnings in polly
llvm-svn: 312755
2017-09-07 22:46:51 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 3cdf713fd2 Move duplicate helpers from DbgValueInst / DbgDeclareInst to DbgInfoIntrinsic
NFC

llvm-svn: 312754
2017-09-07 22:46:24 +00:00
Rui Ueyama e2f52eb22f Add -no-gdb-index which negates -gdb-index option.
llvm-svn: 312753
2017-09-07 22:40:54 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 84ef7b4258 llvm-ar: exit with 1 if there is an error.
This is pr34396.

llvm-svn: 312752
2017-09-07 22:20:38 +00:00
Paul Robinson bb92137080 [DWARF] Line 0 should not have a discriminator.
It's meaningless and takes up extra space in the line table.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37364

llvm-svn: 312751
2017-09-07 22:15:44 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 6aa34aadd1 [Sema] -Wtautological-compare: handle comparison of unsigned with 0S.
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)

GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).

Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.

Yes, all these testcases are needed.

Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.

Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman

Reviewed By: rjmccall

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565

llvm-svn: 312750
2017-09-07 22:14:25 +00:00
Richard Smith f26c54f9ce Add target triple to improve the happiness of MSVC buildbots.
llvm-svn: 312749
2017-09-07 22:07:52 +00:00
Jonathan Roelofs 6fbb9e017d Fix validation of the -mthread-model flag in the Clang driver
The ToolChain class validates the -mthread-model flag in the constructor which
doesn't work correctly since the thread model methods are virtual methods. The
check is moved into Clang::ConstructJob() when constructing the internal
command line.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D37496

Patch by: Ian Tessier!

llvm-svn: 312748
2017-09-07 22:01:25 +00:00
Reid Kleckner d14d54ba37 Fix llvm-xray tests to avoid subshells
We already uses pipefail to detect failure of a redirected command, so
the "|| echo failure" construct was unnecessary.

These tests run and pass on Windows now.

llvm-svn: 312747
2017-09-07 21:28:09 +00:00
Lang Hames 7b7572b8d1 [ORC] Add ErrorSuccess and void specializations to AsyncHandlerTraits.
This will allow async handlers to be added that return void or Error::success().
Such handlers are expected to be common, since one of the primary uses of
addAsyncHandler is to run the body of the handler in a detached thread, in which
case the main handler returns immediately and does not need to provide an Error
value.

llvm-svn: 312746
2017-09-07 21:04:00 +00:00
Petr Hosek 5c469a3daa [yaml2obj][ELF] Add support for symbol indexes greater than SHN_LORESERVE
Right now Symbols must be either undefined or defined in a specific
section. Some symbols have section indexes like SHN_ABS however. This
change adds support for outputting symbols that have such section
indexes.

Patch by Jake Ehrlich

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37391

llvm-svn: 312745
2017-09-07 20:44:16 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 9e26e97955 COFF: PDB: Allow multiple modules with the same name.
It is possible for two modules to have the same name if they are
archive members with the same name, or if we are doing LTO (in which
case all modules will have the name "lto.tmp").

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37589

llvm-svn: 312744
2017-09-07 20:39:46 +00:00
Richard Smith b8c419085f Add IDNS_Tag to C++ declarations that conflict with tag declarations.
Fixes some accepts-invalids with tags and other declarations declared in the
same scope.

llvm-svn: 312743
2017-09-07 20:22:00 +00:00