This change adds sanitizer support for LLVM's libunwind and libc++abi
as an alternative to libstdc++. This allows using the in tree version
of libunwind and libc++abi which is useful when building a toolchain
for different target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34501
llvm-svn: 309362
This change adds support for compiler-rt builtins as an alternative
compiler runtime to libgcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35165
llvm-svn: 309361
This change adds sanitizer support for LLVM's libunwind and libc++abi
as an alternative to libstdc++. This allows using the in tree version
of libunwind and libc++abi which is useful when building a toolchain
for different target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34501
llvm-svn: 309074
This change adds support for compiler-rt builtins as an alternative
compiler runtime to libgcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35165
llvm-svn: 309060
The dynamic type check needs to inspect vtables, but could crash if it
encounters a vtable pointer to inaccessible memory. In the first attempt
to fix the issue (r304437), we performed a memory accessibility check on
the wrong range of memory. This should *really* fix the problem.
Patch by Max Moroz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34215
llvm-svn: 305489
There is can be a situation when vptr is not initializing
by constructor of the object, and has a junk data which should
be properly checked, because c++ standard says:
"if default constructor is not specified
16 (7.3) no initialization is performed."
Patch by Denis Khalikov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33712
llvm-svn: 304437
This makes it possible to get stacktrace info when print_stacktrace=1 on
Darwin (where the slow unwinder is not currently supported [1]). This
should not regress any other platforms.
[1] The thread about r300295 has a relatively recent discusion about
this. We should be able to enable the existing slow unwind functionality
for Darwin, but this needs more testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32517
llvm-svn: 301839
When using ASan and UBSan together, the common sanitizer tool name is
set to "AddressSanitizer". That means that when a UBSan diagnostic is
printed out, it looks like this:
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: ...
This can confuse users. Fix it so that we always use the correct tool
name when printing out UBSan diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32066
llvm-svn: 300358
Add 'nullability_arg' and 'nullability_return' diagnostic handlers, and
also add a TypeCheckKind for null assignments to _Nonnull. With this in
place, we can update clang to use the nicer handlers for nullability
diagnostics.
The alternative to this approach is to update the existing 'nonnull_arg'
and 'nonnull_return' handlers to accept a boolean parameter. However,
versioning the existing handlers would cause code size bloat, and the
complexity cost of introducing new handlers into the runtime is low.
I will add tests for this, and all of -fsanitize=nullability, into
check-ubsan once the clang side of the changes is in.
llvm-svn: 297748
In Windows, when sanitizers are implemented as a shared library (DLL), users can
redefine and export a new definition for weak functions, in the main executable,
for example:
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport)
void __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard(u32* guard) {
// Different implementation provided by the client.
}
However, other dlls, will continue using the default implementation imported
from the sanitizer dll. This is different in linux, where all the shared
libraries will consider the strong definition.
With the implementation in this diff, when the dll is initialized, it will check
if the main executable exports the definition for some weak function (for
example __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard). If it finds that function, then it will
override the function in the dll with that pointer. So, all the dlls with
instrumentation that import __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard__dll() from asan dll,
will be using the function provided by the main executable.
In other words, when the main executable exports a strong definition for a weak
function, we ensure all the dlls use that implementation instead of the default
weak implementation.
The behavior is similar to linux. Now, every user that want to override a weak
function, only has to define and export it. The same for Linux and Windows, and
it will work fine. So, there is no difference on the user's side.
All the sanitizers will include a file sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc that
register sanitizer's weak functions to be intercepted in the binary section WEAK
When the sanitizer dll is initialized, it will execute weak_intercept_init()
which will consider all the CB registered in the section WEAK. So, for all the
weak functions registered, we will check if a strong definition is provided in
the main executable.
All the files sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc are independent, so we do not
need to include a specific list of sanitizers.
Now, we include [asan|ubsan|sanitizer_coverage]_win_weak_interception.cc and
sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc in asan dll, so when it is initialized, it
will consider all the weak functions from asan, ubsan and sanitizer coverage.
After this diff, sanitizer coverage is fixed for MD on Windows. In particular
libFuzzer can provide custom implementation for all sanitizer coverage's weak
functions, and they will be considered by asan dll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29168
llvm-svn: 293958
In Windows, when the sanitizer is implemented as a shared library (DLL), we need
an auxiliary static library dynamic_runtime_thunk that will be linked to the
main executable and dlls.
In the sanitizer DLL, we are exposing weak functions with WIN_WEAK_EXPORT_DEF(),
which exports the default implementation with __dll suffix. For example: for
sanitizer coverage, the default implementation of __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp is
exported as: __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp__dll.
In the dynamic_runtime_thunk static library, we include weak aliases to the
imported implementation from the dll, using the macro WIN_WEAK_IMPORT_DEF().
By default, all users's programs that include calls to weak functions like
__sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp, will be redirected to the implementation in the dll,
when linking to dynamic_runtime_thunk.
After this diff, we are able to compile code with sanitizer coverage
instrumentation on Windows. When the instrumented object files are linked with
clang-rt_asan_dynamic_runtime_thunk-arch.lib all the weak symbols will be
resolved to the implementation imported from asan dll.
All the files sanitizer_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc are independent, so we do not
need to include a specific list of sanitizers.
Now, we compile: [asan|ubsan|sanitizer_coverage]_win_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc
and sanitizer_win_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc to generate
asan_dynamic_runtime_thunk.lib, because we include asan, ubsan and sanitizer
coverage in the address sanitizer library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29158
llvm-svn: 293953
In this diff, I update current implementation of the interception in dll_thunks
to consider the special case of weak functions.
First we check if the client has redefined the function in the main executable
(for example: __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard). It we can't find it, then we look
for the default implementation (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard__dll). The
default implementation is always available because the static runtime is linked
to the main executable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29155
llvm-svn: 293952
When the sanitizer is implemented as a static library and is included in the
main executable, we need an auxiliary static library dll_thunk that will be
linked to the dlls that have instrumentation, so they can refer to the runtime
in the main executable. Basically, it uses interception to get a pointer the
function in the main executable and override its function with that pointer.
Before this diff, all of the implementation for dll_thunks was included in asan.
In this diff I split it into different sanitizers, so we can use other
sanitizers regardless of whether we include asan or not.
All the sanitizers include a file sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc that register
functions to be intercepted in the binary section: DLLTH
When the dll including dll_thunk is initialized, it will execute
__dll_thunk_init() implemented in: sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc,
which will consider all the CB registered in the section DLLTH. So, all the
functions registered will be intercepted, and redirected to the implementation
in the main executable.
All the files "sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc" are independent, so we don't need to
include a specific list of sanitizers. Now, we compile: asan_win_dll_thunk.cc
ubsan_win_dll_thunk.cc, sanitizer_coverage_win_dll_thunk.cc and
sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc, to generate asan_dll_thunk, because we include asan,
ubsan and sanitizer coverage in the address sanitizer library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29154
llvm-svn: 293951
Add a new auxiliary file to each sanitizer: sanitizer_interface.inc, listing all
the functions exported, with the macros: INTERFACE_FUNCTION() and
INTERFACE_WEAK_FUNCTION().
So, when we need to define or repeat a procedure for each function in the
sanitizer's interface, we can define the macros and include that header.
In particular, these files are needed for Windows, in the nexts commits.
Also, this files could replace the existing files: weak_symbols.txt for Apple.
Instead of reading weak_symbols.txt to get the list of weak symbols, we could
read the file sanitizer_interface.inc and consider all the symbols included with
the macro INTERFACE_WEAK_FUNCTION(Name).
In this commit, I only include these files to the sanitizers that work on
Windows. We could do the same for the rest of the sanitizers when needed.
I updated tests for: Linux, Darwin and Windows. If a new function is exported
but is not present in the interface list, the tests
"interface_symbols_[darwin|windows|linux].c" fail.
Also, I remove the comments: "/* OPTIONAL */" which are not required any more,
because we use the macro: INTERFACE_WEAK_FUNCTION() for weak functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29148
llvm-svn: 293682
In this diff, I define a general macro for defining weak functions
with a default implementation: "SANITIZER_INTERFACE_WEAK_DEF()".
This way, we simplify the implementation for different platforms.
For example, we cannot define weak functions on Windows, but we can
use linker pragmas to create an alias to a default implementation.
All of these implementation details are hidden in the new macro.
Also, as I modify the name for exported weak symbols on Windows, I
needed to temporarily disable "dll_host" test for asan, which checks
the list of functions included in asan_win_dll_thunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28596
llvm-svn: 293419
This patch adds some useful macros for dealing with pragma directives on
Windows. Also, I add appropriate documentation for future users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28525
llvm-svn: 292650
Summary:
The build system was inconsistent in its naming conventions for
link flags. This patch changes all uses of LINKFLAGS to LINK_FLAGS,
for consistency with cmake's LINK_FLAGS property.
This patch should make it easier to search the source code for
uses of link flags, as well as providing the benefit of improved
style and consistency.
Reviewers: compnerd, beanz
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28506
llvm-svn: 291539
Summary:
By default, darwin requires a definition for weak interface functions at
link time. Adding the '-U' link flag with each weak function allows these
weak interface functions to be used without definitions, which mirrors
behavior on linux and windows.
Reviewers: compnerd, eugenis
Subscribers: kubabrecka, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28203
llvm-svn: 291417
Summary:
By default, darwin requires a definition for weak interface functions at
link time. Adding the '-U' link flag with each weak function allows these
weak interface functions to be used without definitions, which mirrors
behavior on linux and windows.
Reviewers: compnerd, eugenis
Subscribers: kubabrecka, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28203
llvm-svn: 291314
This patch starts passing architecture information about a module to llvm-symbolizer and into text reports. This fixes the longstanding x86_64/x86_64h mismatch issue on Darwin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27390
llvm-svn: 291287
Summary: This is the compiler-rt side of D28242.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka, pgousseau, gbedwell
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28244
llvm-svn: 291237
The definitions in sanitizer_common may conflict with definitions from system headers because:
The runtime includes the system headers after the project headers (as per LLVM coding guidelines).
lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h pollutes the namespace of everything defined after it, which is all/most of the sanitizer .h and .cc files and the included system headers with: using namespace __sanitizer; // NOLINT
This patch solves the problem by introducing the namespace only within the sanitizer namespaces as proposed by Dmitry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21947
llvm-svn: 281657
This patch builds on LLVM r279776.
In this patch I've done some cleanup and abstracted three common steps runtime components have in their CMakeLists files, and added a fourth.
The three steps I abstract are:
(1) Add a top-level target (i.e asan, msan, ...)
(2) Set the target properties for sorting files in IDE generators
(3) Make the compiler-rt target depend on the top-level target
The new step is to check if a command named "runtime_register_component" is defined, and to call it with the component name.
The runtime_register_component command is defined in llvm/runtimes/CMakeLists.txt, and presently just adds the component to a list of sub-components, which later gets used to generate target mappings.
With this patch a new workflow for runtimes builds is supported. The new workflow when building runtimes from the LLVM runtimes directory is:
> cmake [...]
> ninja runtimes-configure
> ninja asan
The "runtimes-configure" target builds all the dependencies for configuring the runtimes projects, and runs CMake on the runtimes projects. Running the runtimes CMake generates a list of targets to bind into the top-level CMake so subsequent build invocations will have access to some of Compiler-RT's targets through the top-level build.
Note: This patch does exclude some top-level targets from compiler-rt libraries because they either don't install files (sanitizer_common), or don't have a cooresponding `check` target (stats).
llvm-svn: 279863
Summary: This will allow for the sanitizers to be used when c++ abi is unavailable.
Reviewers: samsonov, beanz, pcc, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka, compnerd, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23376
llvm-svn: 279816
Summary:
On apple targets, when SANITIZER_CAN_USE_CXXABI is false,
the ubsan cxxabi sources aren't built, since they're unused.
Do this on non-apple targets as well.
This fixes errors when linking sanitizers if c++ abi is
unavailable.
Reviewers: pcc, kubabrecka, beanz
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits, kubabrecka, compnerd, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23638
llvm-svn: 279467
Summary: This will allow for the sanitizers to be used when c++ abi is unavailable.
Reviewers: samsonov, beanz, pcc, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka, compnerd, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23376
llvm-svn: 278848
Vitaly Buka