|9B DD /7| FSTSW m2byte| Valid Valid Store FPU status word at m2byteafter checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|9B DF E0| FSTSW AX| Valid Valid Store FPU status word in AX register after checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|DD /7 |FNSTSW *m2byte| Valid Valid Store FPU status word at m2bytewithout checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|DF E0 |FNSTSW *AX| Valid Valid Store FPU status word in AX register without checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions|
m2byte is word register, and therefor instruction operand need to be change from f32mem to i16mem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14953
llvm-svn: 254512
On FMA targets, we can avoid having to load a constant to negate a float/double multiply by instead using a FNMSUB (-(X*Y)-0)
Fix for PR24366
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14909
llvm-svn: 254495
I checked and updated the cost of AVX-512 conversion operations. Added cost of conversion operations in DQ mode.
Conversion of illegal types that requires vector split is not calculated right now (like for other X86 targets).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15074
llvm-svn: 254494
Not sure how to test this. I noticed by inspection in the isel tables where the same pattern tried to produce DIV and DIVR or SUB and SUBR.
llvm-svn: 254388
We currently output FMA instructions on targets which support both FMA4 + FMA (i.e. later Bulldozer CPUS bdver2/bdver3/bdver4).
This patch flips this so FMA4 is preferred; this is for several reasons:
1 - FMA4 is non-destructive reducing the need for mov instructions.
2 - Its more straighforward to commute and fold inputs (although the recent work on FMA has reduced this difference).
3 - All supported targets have FMA4 performance equal or better to FMA - Piledriver (bdver2) in particular has half the throughput when executing FMA instructions.
Its looks like no future AMD processor lines will support FMA4 after the Bulldozer series so we're not causing problems for later CPUs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14997
llvm-svn: 254339
The MachineVerifier wants to check that the register operands of an
instruction belong to the instruction's register class. RIP-relative
control flow instructions violated this by referencing RIP. While this
was fixed for SysV, it was never fixed for Win64.
llvm-svn: 254315
We could already recognise shuffle(FSUB, FADD) -> ADDSUB, this allow us to recognise shuffle(FADD, FSUB) -> ADDSUB by commuting the shuffle mask prior to matching.
llvm-svn: 254259
generated for _mm_losd_s{s,d}() intrinsics and used in scalar FMAs generated
for FMA intrinsics _mm_f{madd,msub,nmadd,nmsub}_s{s,d}().
Reviewer: David Kreitzer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14762
llvm-svn: 254140
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
It was wrong order of operands (from intrinsic to DAG node).
I added more strict type specification for instruction selection.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14942
llvm-svn: 254059
This caused PR25607 and also caused Chromium to crash on start-up.
(Also had to update test/CodeGen/X86/avx-splat.ll, which was committed
after shrink wrapping was enabled.)
llvm-svn: 254044
X86 needs to use its own FMA opcodes, preventing the standard FNEG(FMA) pattern table recognition method used by other platforms. This patch adds support for lowering FNEG(FMA(X,Y,Z)) into a single suitably negated FMA instruction.
Fix for PR24364
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14906
llvm-svn: 254016
This patch fixes the following issues:
1. Fix the return type of X86psadbw: it should not be the same type of inputs.
For vNi8 inputs the output should be vMi64, where M = N/8.
2. Fix the return type of int_x86_avx512_psad_bw_512 accordingly.
3. Fix the definiton of PSADBW, VPSADBW, and VPSADBWY accordingly.
4. Adjust the return type when building a DAG node of X86ISD::PSADBW type.
5. Update related tests.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897
llvm-svn: 254010
We had duplicated definitions for the same hardware '[v]movq' instructions. For example with SSE:
def MOVZQI2PQIrr : RS2I<0x6E, MRMSrcReg, (outs VR128:$dst), (ins GR64:$src),
"mov{d|q}\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", // X86-64 only
[(set VR128:$dst, (v2i64 (X86vzmovl (v2i64 (scalar_to_vector GR64:$src)))))],
IIC_SSE_MOVDQ>;
def MOV64toPQIrr : RS2I<0x6E, MRMSrcReg, (outs VR128:$dst), (ins GR64:$src),
"mov{d|q}\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
[(set VR128:$dst, (v2i64 (scalar_to_vector GR64:$src)))],
IIC_SSE_MOVDQ>, Sched<[WriteMove]>;
As shown in the test case and PR25554:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25554
This causes us to miss reusing an operand because later passes don't know these 'movq' are the same instruction.
This patch deletes one pair of these defs.
Sadly, this won't fix the original test case in the bug report. Something else is still broken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14941
llvm-svn: 253988
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
This patch detects the AVG pattern in vectorized code, which is simply
c = (a + b + 1) / 2, where a, b, and c have the same type which are vectors of
either unsigned i8 or unsigned i16. In the IR, i8/i16 will be promoted to
i32 before any arithmetic operations. The following IR shows such an example:
%1 = zext <N x i8> %a to <N x i32>
%2 = zext <N x i8> %b to <N x i32>
%3 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %1, <i32 1 x N>
%4 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %3, %2
%5 = lshr <N x i32> %N, <i32 1 x N>
%6 = trunc <N x i32> %5 to <N x i8>
and with this patch it will be converted to a X86ISD::AVG instruction.
The pattern recognition is done when combining instructions just before type
legalization during instruction selection. We do it here because after type
legalization, it is much more difficult to do pattern recognition based
on many instructions that are doing type conversions. Therefore, for
target-specific instructions (like X86ISD::AVG), we need to take care of type
legalization by ourselves. However, as X86ISD::AVG behaves similarly to
ISD::ADD, I am wondering if there is a way to legalize operands and result
types of X86ISD::AVG together with ISD::ADD. It seems that the current design
doesn't support this idea.
Tests are added for SSE2, AVX2, and AVX512BW and both i8 and i16 types of
variant vector sizes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14761
llvm-svn: 253952
Caller saved regs differ between SysV and Win64. Use the tail call available set to scavenge from.
Refactor register info to create new helper to get at tail call GPRs. Added a new test case for windows. Fixed up a number of X64 tests since now RCX is preferred over RDX on SysV.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14878
llvm-svn: 253927
ISERT_SUBVECTOR for i1 vectors may be done with shifts, when we insert into the lower part, or into the upper part, on into all-zero vector.
CONCAT_VECTORS uses ISERT_SUBVECTOR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14815
llvm-svn: 253819
It turns out we have a number of places that just grab the first type attached to a register class for various reasons. This is fine unless for some reason that type isn't legal on the current target, such as for SSE1 which doesn't support v16i8/v8i16/v4i32/v2i64 - all of which were included before 4f32 in the class.
Given that this is such a rare situation I've just re-ordered the types and placed the float types first.
Fix for PR16133
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14787
llvm-svn: 253773
Copying one mask register to another under BW should be done with kmovq instruction, otherwise we can loose some bits.
Copying 8 bits under DQ may be done with kmovb.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14812
llvm-svn: 253563
The lowering patterns for X86ISD::VZEXT_MOVL for 128-bit to 256-bit vectors were just copying the lower xmm instead of actually masking off the first scalar using a blend.
Fix for PR25320.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14151
llvm-svn: 253561
Make X86AsmBackend generate smarter nops instead of a bunch of 0x90 for code alignment for CPUs which don't support long nop instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14178
llvm-svn: 253557
The masked intrinsics support all integer and floating point data types. I added the pointer type to this list.
Added tests for CodeGen and for Loop Vectorizer.
Updated the Language Reference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14150
llvm-svn: 253544
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
Summary:
Now that there is a one-to-one mapping from MachineFunction to
WinEHFuncInfo, we don't need to use a DenseMap to select the right
WinEHFuncInfo for the current funclet.
The main challenge here is that X86WinEHStatePass is an IR pass that
doesn't have access to the MachineFunction. I gave it its own
WinEHFuncInfo object that it uses to calculate state numbers, which it
then throws away. As long as nobody creates or removes EH pads between
this pass and SDAG construction, we will get the same state numbers.
The other thing X86WinEHStatePass does is to mark the EH registration
node. Instead of communicating which alloca was the registration through
WinEHFuncInfo, I added the llvm.x86.seh.ehregnode intrinsic. This
intrinsic generates no code and simply marks the alloca in use.
Reviewers: JCTremoulet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14668
llvm-svn: 253378
Currently, if the assembler encounters an error after parsing (such as an
out-of-range fixup), it reports this as a fatal error, and so stops after the
first error. However, for most of these there is an obvious way to recover
after emitting the error, such as emitting the fixup with a value of zero. This
means that we can report on all of the errors in a file, not just the first
one. MCContext::reportError records the fact that an error was encountered, so
we won't actually emit an object file with the incorrect contents.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14717
llvm-svn: 253328
On top of that, don't bother allocating and initializing UnwindHelp if
we don't have any funclets. Currently we always use RBP as our frame
pointer when funclets are present, so this change makes it impossible to
come here without any fixed stack objects.
Fixes PR25533.
llvm-svn: 253245
MCRelaxableFragment previously kept a copy of MCSubtargetInfo and
MCInst to enable re-encoding the MCInst later during relaxation. A copy
of MCSubtargetInfo (instead of a reference or pointer) was needed
because the feature bits could be modified by the parser.
This commit replaces the MCSubtargetInfo copy in MCRelaxableFragment
with a constant reference to MCSubtargetInfo. The copies of
MCSubtargetInfo are kept in MCContext, and the target parsers are now
responsible for asking MCContext to provide a copy whenever the feature
bits of MCSubtargetInfo have to be toggled.
With this patch, I saw a 4% reduction in peak memory usage when I
compiled verify-uselistorder.lto.bc using llc.
rdar://problem/21736951
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346
llvm-svn: 253127
MCSubtargetInfo in the subclasses into MCTargetAsmParser and define a
member function getSTI.
This is done in preparation for making changes to shrink the size of
MCRelaxableFragment. (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346).
llvm-svn: 253124
The C++ EH personality automatically restores ESP from the C++ EH
registration node after a catchret. I mistakenly thought it was like
SEH, which does not restore ESP.
It makes sense for C++ EH to differ from SEH here because SEH does not
use funclets for catches, and does not allow catching inside of finally.
C++ EH may need to unwind through multiple catch funclets and eventually
catchret to some outer funclet. Therefore, the runtime has to keep track
of which ESP to use with catchret, rather than having the compiler
reload it manually.
llvm-svn: 253084
This patch is enabling combining UNPCKL with vector_shuffle that moves the upper
half of a vector into the lower half, into a UNPCKH instruction. For example:
t2: v16i8 = vector_shuffle<8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u> t1, undef:v16i8
t3: v16i8 = X86ISD::UNPCKL undef:v16i8, t2
will be combined to:
t3: v16i8 = X86ISD::UNPCKH undef:v16i8, t1
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14399
llvm-svn: 253067
Summary:
The value that the CoreCLR personality passes to a funclet for the
establisher frame may be the root function's frame or may be the parent
funclet's (mostly empty) frame in the case of nested funclets. Each
funclet stores a pointer to the root frame in its own (mostly empty)
frame, as does the root function itself. All frames allocate this slot at
the same offset, measured from the post-prolog stack pointer, so that the
same sequence can accept any ancestor as an establisher frame parameter
value, and so that a single offset can be reported to the GC, which also
looks at this slot.
This change allocate the slot when processing function entry, and records
its frame index on the WinEHFuncInfo object, then inserts the code to
set/copy it during prolog emission.
Reviewers: majnemer, AndyAyers, pgavlin, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14614
llvm-svn: 252983
It made it possible to apply the memory folding optimization for the 2nd
operand of FMA*_Int instructions.
Reviewer: Quentin Colombet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14550
llvm-svn: 252973
LLVM Missing the following instructions: fadd\fdiv\fmul\fsub\fsubr\fdivr.
GAS and MS supporting this instruction and lowering them in to a faddp\fdivp\fmulp\fsubp\fsubrp\fdivrp instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14217
llvm-svn: 252908
Summary: Other personalities don't use this special frame slot.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14580
llvm-svn: 252778
If possible and profitable, replace lea %reg, 1(%reg) and lea %reg, -1(%reg) with inc %reg and dec %reg respectively.
Patch by: anton.nadolsky@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14059
llvm-svn: 252722
Michael Zuckerman