Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware
breakpoints internally, for example while stepping.
This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces
LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints
are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends
error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221
llvm-svn: 346920
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
That's good 'cause it means all the different kinds of source line stepping won't leave user in the middle of
compiler implementation code or code inlined from odd places, etc. But it turns out that the compiler
also marks functions it MIGHT inline as all being of line 0. That would mean we single step through this code
instead of just stepping out. That is both inefficient, and more error prone 'cause these little nuggets tend
to be bits of hand-written assembly and the like and are hard to step through.
This change just checks and if the entire function is marked with line 0, we step out rather than step through.
<rdar://problem/25966460>
llvm-svn: 268823
with the one change that ThreadPlanStepOut::ThreadPlanStepOut
will now only advance the return address breakpoint to
the end of a source line, if we have source line debug information.
It will not advance to the end of a Symbol if we lack source line
information. This, or the recognition of the LEAVE instruction
in r257209, would have fixed the regression that Siva was seeing.
Both were good changes, so I've made both.
Original commit message:
Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it puts a breakpoint
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.
I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>
llvm-svn: 257210
puts a breakpoint" it is causing a regression in the TestStepNoDebug
test case on ubuntu 14.04 with gcc 4.9.2. Thanks for the email
Siva. I'll recommit when I've figured out the regression.
llvm-svn: 257138
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.
I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>
llvm-svn: 257117
the same parent frame, but different current frame - e.g. when
you step past a tail call exit from a function. Apply the same
"avoid-no-debug" rules to this case as for a "step-in".
<rdar://problem/16189225>
llvm-svn: 214946
for customizing "step-in" behavior (e.g. step-in doesn't step into code with no debug info), but also
the behavior of step-in/step-out and step-over when they step out of the frame they started in.
I also added as a proof of concept of this reworking a mode for stepping where stepping out of a frame
into a frame with no debug information will continue stepping out till it arrives at a frame that does
have debug information. This is useful when you are debugging callback based code where the callbacks
are separated from the code that initiated them by some library glue you don't care about, among other
things.
llvm-svn: 203747
plan providers from a "ThreadPlan *" to a "lldb::ThreadPlanSP". That was needed to fix
a bug where the ThreadPlanStepInRange wasn't checking with its sub-plans to make sure they
succeed before trying to proceed further. If the sub-plan failed and as a result didn't make
any progress, you could end up retrying the same failing algorithm in an infinite loop.
<rdar://problem/14043602>
llvm-svn: 186618
LLDB is crashing when logging is enabled from lldb-perf-clang. This has to do with the global destructor chain as the process and its threads are being torn down.
All logging channels now make one and only one instance that is kept in a global pointer which is never freed. This guarantees that logging can correctly continue as the process tears itself down.
llvm-svn: 178191
the function it is being asked to step through, so that even if we get the trampoline
target wrong (for instance) we will still not lose control.
The other fix here is to tighten up the handling of the case where the current plan
doesn't explain the stop, but a plan above us does. In that case, if the plan that
does explain the stop says it is done, we need to clean up the plans below it and
continue on with our processing.
llvm-svn: 145740
Raphael Isemann