This reverts commit r234700. It turns out that the lifetime markers
were not the cause of Chromium failing but a bug which was uncovered by
optimizations exposed by the markers.
llvm-svn: 235553
Now that TailRecursionElimination has been fixed with r222354, the
threshold on size for lifetime marker insertion can be removed. This
only affects named temporary though, as the patch for unnamed temporaries
is still in progress.
My previous commit (r222993) was not handling debuginfo correctly, but
this could only be seen with some asan tests. Basically, lifetime markers
are just instrumentation for the compiler's usage and should not affect
debug information; however, the cleanup infrastructure was assuming it
contained only destructors, i.e. actual code to be executed, and was
setting the breakpoint for the end of the function to the closing '}', and
not the return statement, in order to show some destructors have been
called when leaving the function. This is wrong when the cleanups are only
lifetime markers, and this is now fixed.
llvm-svn: 234581
This is complicated by the fact that we can't simply use side-effecting
calls in an argument list without losing all guarantees about the order
they're emitted. To keep things deterministic we use tuples and brace
initialization, which thankfully guarantees evaluation order.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 232121
It says there is a narrowing conversion when we assign it to an unsigned
3 bit bitfield.
Also, use unsigned instead of size_t for the Size field of the struct in
question. Otherwise they won't run together in MSVC or clang-cl.
llvm-svn: 221019
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
David Majnemer