In getCastInstrCost when the instruction is a truncate we were relying
upon the implicit TypeSize -> uint64_t cast when asking if a given type
has the same size as a legal integer. I've changed the code to only
ask the question if the type is fixed length.
I have also changed InstCombinerImpl::SimplifyDemandedUseBits to bail
out for now if the type is a scalable vector.
I've added the following new tests:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-trunc.ll
Transforms/InstCombine/AArch64/sve-trunc.ll
for both of these fixes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86432
test referenced a relative path to a file, but the path was not correct
relative to the project the test is in
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86368
Modify the ARM getCmpSelInstrCost implementation for the code size
costs of selects. Now consider the legalization cost and increase
the cost of i1 because those values wouldn't live in a general purpose
register. We also make selects +1 more expensive to account for the IT
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82091
StackLifetime class collects lifetime marker of an `alloca` by collect
the user of `BitCast` who is the user of the `alloca`. However, either
the `alloca` itself could be used with the lifetime marker or the `BitCast`
of the `alloca` could be transformed to other instructions. (e.g.,
it may be transformed to all zero reps in `InstCombine` pass).
This patch tries to fix this process in `collectMarkers` functions.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85399
The current demand propagator for addition will mark all input bits at and right of the alive output bit as alive. But carry won't propagate beyond a bit for which both operands are zero (or one/zero in the case of subtraction) so a more accurate answer is possible given known bits.
I derived a propagator by working through truth tables and using a bit-reversed addition to make demand ripple to the right, but I'm not sure how to make a convincing argument for its correctness in the comments yet. Nevertheless, here's a minimal implementation and test to get feedback.
This would help in a situation where, for example, four bytes (<128) packed into an int are added with four others SIMD-style but only one of the four results is actually read.
Known A: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
Known B: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
AOut: 00000000001000000000000000000000
AB, current: 00000000001111111111111111111111
AB, patch: 00000000001111111000000000000000
Committed on behalf of: @rrika (Erika)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72423
If we can't identify alloca used in lifetime marker we
need to assume to worst case scenario.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84630
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
This reverts commit e441b7a7a0.
This patch causes a compile error in tensorflow opensource project. The stack trace looks like:
Point of crash:
llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopInfoImpl.h : line 35
(gdb) ptype *this
type = const class llvm::LoopBase<llvm::BasicBlock, llvm::Loop> [with BlockT = llvm::BasicBlock, LoopT = llvm::Loop]
(gdb) p *this
$1 = {ParentLoop = 0x0, SubLoops = std::vector of length 0, capacity 0, Blocks = std::vector of length 0, capacity 1,
DenseBlockSet = {<llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::BasicBlock const*>> = {<llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase> = {<llvm::DebugEpochBase> = {Epoch = 3}, SmallArray = 0x1b2bf6c8, CurArray = 0x1b2bf6c8,
CurArraySize = 8, NumNonEmpty = 0, NumTombstones = 0}, <No data fields>}, SmallStorage = {0xfffffffffffffffe, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}}, IsInvalid = true}
(gdb) p *this->DenseBlockSet->CurArray
$2 = (const void *) 0xfffffffffffffffe
I will try to get a case from tensorflow or use creduce to get a small case.
Now that SCEVExpander can preserve LCSSA form,
we do not have to worry about LCSSA form when
trying to look through PHIs. SCEVExpander will take
care of inserting LCSSA PHI nodes as required.
This increases precision of the analysis in some cases.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev, bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71539
This is the max version of D85046.
This change causes binary changes in 44 out of 237 benchmarks (out of
MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006)
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85189
Constant fold both the trapping and saturating versions of the
WebAssembly truncation intrinsics. The tests are adapted from the
WebAssembly spec tests for the corresponding instructions.
Requested in PR46982.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85392
If we can't identify alloca used in lifetime marker we
need to assume to worst case scenario.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84630
Add cases of fused fmul+fadd/fsub with f16 and f64 operands to cost model.
Also added operations with contract attribute.
Fixed line endings in test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84995
As mentioned in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143395.html,
loop-unswitch has not been ported to the NPM. Instead people are using
simple-loop-unswitch.
Pin all tests in Transforms/LoopUnswitch to legacy PM and replace all
other uses of loop-unswitch with simple-loop-unswitch.
One test that didn't fit into the above was
2014-06-21-congruent-constant.ll which seems to only pass with
loop-unswitch. That is also pinned to legacy PM.
Now all tests containing "-loop-unswitch" anywhere in the test succeed with
NPM turned on by default.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85360
-print-memoryssa in legacy PM is print<memoryssa> in NPM.
Pin tests with -print-memoryssa to legacy PM.
Add corresponding tests for NPM where missing.
This fixes "unknown pass name 'print-memoryssa'".
Some tests still fail in Analysis/MemorySSA due to other passes that
haven't been ported.
pr43427.ll and pr43438.ll required adding -aa-pipeline=basic-aa,
-loop-simplify (since it doesn't run on legacy PM by default), and
decrementing some of the MemoryPhi numbers.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85333
As with other targets, set the throughput cost of control-flow
instructions to free so that we don't miss out of vectorization
opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85283
This option was added a while back, to help improve AA around pointer
phi loops. It looks for phi(gep(phi, const), x) loops, checking if x can
then prove more precise aliasing info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82998
Merging alias results from different paths, when a path did phi
translation is not necesarily correct. Conservatively terminate such paths.
Aimed to fix PR46156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84905
In some cases, it seems like we can get rid of unnecessary s/umins by
using information from the loop guards (unless I am missing something).
One place where this seems to be helpful in practice is when computing
loop trip counts. This patch just changes howManyGreaterThans for now.
Note that this requires a loop for which we can check 'is guarded'.
On SPEC2000/SPEC2006/MultiSource, there are some notable changes for
some programs in the number of loops unrolled and trip counts computed.
```
Same hash: 179 (filtered out)
Remaining: 58
Metric: scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed
Program base patch diff
test-suite...langs-C/compiler/compiler.test 25.00 31.00 24.0%
test-suite.../Applications/SPASS/SPASS.test 2020.00 2323.00 15.0%
test-suite...langs-C/allroots/allroots.test 29.00 32.00 10.3%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C/loader/loader.test 17.00 18.00 5.9%
test-suite...fice-ispell/office-ispell.test 253.00 265.00 4.7%
test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test 3552.00 3692.00 3.9%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 453.00 470.00 3.8%
test-suite...ngs-C/assembler/assembler.test 29.00 30.00 3.4%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc.test 263.00 270.00 2.7%
test-suite...rks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test 722.00 741.00 2.6%
test-suite...count/automotive-bitcount.test 41.00 42.00 2.4%
test-suite...0/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk.test 1417.00 1451.00 2.4%
test-suite...000/197.parser/197.parser.test 387.00 396.00 2.3%
test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 1168.00 1189.00 1.8%
test-suite...000/255.vortex/255.vortex.test 173.00 176.00 1.7%
Metric: loop-unroll.NumUnrolled
Program base patch diff
test-suite...langs-C/compiler/compiler.test 1.00 3.00 200.0%
test-suite.../Applications/SPASS/SPASS.test 134.00 234.00 74.6%
test-suite...count/automotive-bitcount.test 3.00 4.00 33.3%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C/loader/loader.test 3.00 4.00 33.3%
test-suite...langs-C/allroots/allroots.test 3.00 4.00 33.3%
test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test 10.00 12.00 20.0%
test-suite...fice-ispell/office-ispell.test 21.00 25.00 19.0%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc.test 32.00 38.00 18.8%
test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test 300.00 352.00 17.3%
test-suite...rks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test 60.00 69.00 15.0%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 57.00 63.00 10.5%
test-suite...ngs-C/assembler/assembler.test 10.00 11.00 10.0%
test-suite...0/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk.test 145.00 157.00 8.3%
test-suite...000/197.parser/197.parser.test 43.00 46.00 7.0%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 205.00 214.00 4.4%
Geomean difference 7.6%
```
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46939
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46924 on X86.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85046
For consistency with legacy pass name.
Helps with 37 instances of "unknown pass name 'tbaa'" in check-llvm under NPM.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84967
David Sherwood