it is available. Also make the move semantics sufficiently correct to
tolerate move-only passes, as the PassManagers *are* move-only passes.
llvm-svn: 203391
This removes all references to OwningPtr, which should be fairly
undisruptive to out-of-tree projects since they are unlikely to use
clang-tools-extra as a library instead of a set of tools.
llvm-svn: 203382
Value::user_iterator changes in LLVM r203364. Converts several of these
loops to nice range based loops in the process.
Built and tested cleanly for me, yay for being able to fully build and
test Polly changes!
llvm-svn: 203381
The grammar for LLVM IR is not well specified in any document but seems
to obey the following rules:
- Attributes which have parenthesized arguments are never preceded by
commas. This form of attribute is the only one which ever has
optional arguments. However, not all of these attributes support
optional arguments: 'thread_local' supports an optional argument but
'addrspace' does not. Interestingly, 'addrspace' is documented as
being a "qualifier". What constitutes a qualifier? I cannot find a
definition.
- Some attributes use a space between the keyword and the value.
Examples of this form are 'align' and 'section'. These are always
preceded by a comma.
- Otherwise, the attribute has no argument. These attributes do not
have a preceding comma.
Sometimes an attribute goes before the instruction, between the
instruction and it's type, or after it's type. 'atomicrmw' has
'volatile' between the instruction and the type while 'call' has 'tail'
preceding the instruction.
With all this in mind, it seems most consistent for 'inalloca' on an
'inalloca' instruction to occur before between the instruction and the
type. Unlike the current formulation, there would be no preceding
comma. The combination 'alloca inalloca' doesn't look particularly
appetizing, perhaps a better spelling of 'inalloca' is down the road.
llvm-svn: 203376
This reverts commit r203374.
Ambiguities in assign... oh well. I'm just going to revert this and
probably not try to recommit it as it's not terribly important.
llvm-svn: 203375
Move a common utility (assign(iter, iter)) into SmallVector (some of the
others could be moved there too, but this one seemed particularly
generic) and replace repetitions overrides with using directives.
And simplify SmallVector::assign(num, element) while I'm here rather
than thrashing these files (that cause everyone to rebuild) again.
llvm-svn: 203374
MSVC (2012, 2013, 2013 Nov CTP) fail on the following code:
int main() {
int arr[] = {1, 2};
for (int i : arr)
do {} while (0);
}
The fix is to put {} around the for loop. I've reported this to the MSVC
team.
llvm-svn: 203371
Padding does not seem to be useful currently, and it leads to bogus location if an error
points to the end of the file.
rdar://15836513
llvm-svn: 203370
r203364: what was use_iterator is now user_iterator, and there is
a use_iterator for directly iterating over the uses.
This also switches to use the range-based APIs where appropriate.
llvm-svn: 203365
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
memcpy cannot be passed NULL. Ensuring that the destination pointer is non-NULL
requires checking success. Rather than performing the success check at that
point, increasing indentation an additional level, fold it into the previous
statement.
llvm-svn: 203359
Simon Atanasyan