We are relying on atrificial DAG edges inserted by the
MemOpClusterMutation to keep loads and stores together in the
post-RA scheduler. This does not work all the time since it
allows to schedule a completely independent instruction in the
middle of the cluster.
Removed the DAG mutation and added pass to bundle already
clustered instructions. These bundles are unpacked before the
memory legalizer because it does not work with bundles but also
because it allows to insert waitcounts in the middle of a store
cluster.
Removing artificial edges also allows a more relaxed scheduling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72737
Summary:
The symbols use the processor-specific SHN_AMDGPU_LDS section index
introduced with a previous change. The linker is then expected to resolve
relocations, which are also emitted.
Initially disabled for HSA and PAL environments until they have caught up
in terms of linker and runtime loader.
Some notes:
- The llvm.amdgcn.groupstaticsize intrinsics can no longer be lowered
to a constant at compile times, which means some tests can no longer
be applied.
The current "solution" is a terrible hack, but the intrinsic isn't
used by Mesa, so we can keep it for now.
- We no longer know the full LDS size per kernel at compile time, which
means that we can no longer generate a relevant error message at
compile time. It would be possible to add a check for the size of
individual variables, but ultimately the linker will have to perform
the final check.
Change-Id: If66dbf33fccfbf3609aefefa2558ac0850d42275
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, t-tye, b-sumner, jsjodin
Subscribers: qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61494
llvm-svn: 364297
Intrinsic already existed for llvm.SI.tbuffer.store
Needed tbuffer.load and also re-implementing the intrinsic as llvm.amdgcn.tbuffer.*
Added CodeGen tests for the 2 new variants added.
Left the original llvm.SI.tbuffer.store implementation to avoid issues with existing code
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30687
llvm-svn: 306031
Summary:
See the new test case for one that was (non-deterministically) crashing
on trunk and deterministically hit the assertion that I added in D23302.
Basically, the machine function contains a sequence
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
%vreg14:sub1<def> = COPY %vreg14:sub0
and SILoadStoreOptimizer::mergeWrite2Pair merges the two DS_WRITE_B32
instructions into one before calling repairIntervalsInRange.
Now repairIntervalsInRange wants to repair %vreg14, in particular, and
ends up trying to repair %vreg14:sub1 as well, but that only becomes
active _after_ the range that is to be repaired, hence the crash due
to LR.find(...) == LR.begin() at the start of repairOldRegInRange.
I believe that just skipping those subrange is fine, but again, not too
familiar with that code.
Reviewers: MatzeB, kparzysz, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23303
llvm-svn: 278268
Matt Arsenault