Testcase coming out of creduce will land in a separate commit shortly.
Also, it appears that this callback is used even in a SFINAE context where the results are never displayed.
llvm-svn: 208062
Ideally, importing Foo.a from Foo.b would "do the right thing", but
until it does, this patch makes it an error rather than allow it to
silently be ignored.
llvm-svn: 207948
* Fixes a "return" that was indented at the same level as the continuation
from the previous line
* Wrap several lines to 80 columns
* Remove an if check that was always true
* Move a variable declaration slightly closer to its use
llvm-svn: 207922
class template member classes (PR19613)
Also improve this code in general by implementing suggestions
from Richard.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3555?id=9020
llvm-svn: 207822
order by the number of missing or extra parameters. This is useful if
there are more than a few overload candidates with arity mismatches,
particularly in the presence of -fshow-overloads=best.
llvm-svn: 207796
Summary:
Previously, we would generate a single name for all reference
temporaries and allow LLVM to rename them for us. Instead, number the
reference temporaries as we build them in Sema.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3554
llvm-svn: 207776
We accept 'void *p; p->~void();' for MSVC compatibility since r148682.
However, we were returning ExprError, rather than producing an AST,
despite only diagnosing it with a warning. CodeGen noticed that the
template function specialization had an invalid AST, and therefore
didn't generate code for it. This change makes us produce an AST with a
void pseudo-dtor call.
Part of PR18256.
llvm-svn: 207771
We were emitting dynamic initializers for __thread variables if there
was no explicit initializer, as in this test case:
struct S { S(); };
__thread S s;
llvm-svn: 207675
Summary:
A reference temporary should inherit the linkage of the variable it
initializes. Otherwise, we may hit cases where a reference temporary
wouldn't have the same value in all translation units.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3515
llvm-svn: 207451
Libraries specify enabled/disabled features using macro defs of 0/1, in such cases the -Wconstant-logical-operand
is noise.
rdar://15410291
llvm-svn: 207386
after we've already instantiated a definition for the function, pass it to the
ASTConsumer again so that it knows the specialization kind has changed and can
update the function's linkage.
This only matters if we instantiate the definition of the function before we
reach the end of the TU; this can happen in at least three different ways:
C++11 constexpr functions, C++14 deduced return types, and functions
instantiated within modules.
llvm-svn: 207152
that looks like it might be an explicit specialization, don't recover as an
explicit specialization (bypassing the check that would reject that).
llvm-svn: 206444
Warn on std::abs() with unsigned argument.
Suggest std::abs as replacement for the C absolute value functions.
Suggest C++ headers if the specific std::abs overload is not found.
llvm-svn: 206340
Parse of nested name spacifier is modified so that it properly recovers
if colon is mistyped as double colon in case statement.
This patch fixes PR15133.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2870
llvm-svn: 206135
If the C-style type cast is applied to the overloaded
function and the destination type is function type,
then Clang will crash with assertion failure. For example,
void foo(int);
void foo(int, int);
void bar() {
typedef void (ft)(int);
ft p = (ft)foo;
}
In this case, the overloaded function foo will be cast to
a function type, which should be considered as an error.
But, unfortunately, since the function resolution is using
canonical type, the matched function will be returned, and
result in SEGV.
This patch fixes this issue by removing the assertion and
add some error diagnostics as the one in static_cast.
llvm-svn: 206133
declaration is not visible. Previously we didn't find hidden friend names in
this redeclaration lookup, because we forgot to treat it as a redeclaration
lookup. Conversely, we did find some local extern names, but those don't
actually conflict with a namespace-scope using declaration, because the only
conflicts we can get are scope conflicts, not conflicts due to the entities
being members of the same namespace.
llvm-svn: 206011
This patch adds support for the msvc pragmas section, bss_seg, code_seg,
const_seg and data_seg as well as support for __declspec(allocate()).
Additionally it corrects semantics and adds diagnostics for
__attribute__((section())) and the interaction between the attribute
and the msvc pragmas and declspec. In general conflicts should now be
well diganosed within and among these features.
In supporting the pragmas new machinery for uniform lexing for
msvc pragmas was introduced. The new machinery always lexes the
entire pragma and stores it on an annotation token. The parser
is responsible for parsing the pragma when the handling the
annotation token.
There is a known outstanding bug in this implementation in C mode.
Because these attributes and pragmas apply _only_ to definitions, we
process them at the time we detect a definition. Due to tentative
definitions in C, we end up processing the definition late. This means
that in C mode, everything that ends up in a BSS section will end up in
the _last_ BSS section rather than the one that was live at the time of
tentative definition, even if that turns out to be the point of actual
definition. This issue is not known to impact anything as of yet
because we are not aware of a clear use or use case for #pragma bss_seg
but should be fixed at some point.
Differential Revision=http://reviews.llvm.org/D3065#inline-16241
llvm-svn: 205810
It is very similar to GCC's __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, except it prints the
calling convention.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3311
llvm-svn: 205780
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
obviously won't work. Specifically, don't suggest methods (static or
not) from unrelated classes when the expression is a method call
through a specific object.
llvm-svn: 205653
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
No functionality change.
When determining the pattern for instantiating a generic lambda call operator specialization - we must not go drilling down for the 'prototype' (i.e. as written) pattern - rather we must use our partially transformed pattern (whose DeclRefExprs are wired correctly to any enclosing lambda's decls that should be mapped correctly in a local instantiation scope) that is the templated pattern of the specialization's primary template (even though the primary template might be instantiated from a 'prototype' member-template). Previously, the drilling down was haltted by marking the instantiated-from primary template as a member-specialization (incorrectly).
This prompted Richard to remark (http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784?id=4687#inline-10272)
"It's a bit nasty to (essentially) set this bit incorrectly. Can you put the check into getTemplateInstantiationPattern instead?"
In my reckless youth, I chose to ignore that comment. With the passage of time, I have come to learn the value of bowing to the will of the angry Gods ;)
llvm-svn: 205543
meaningful to odr-use the VarDecl inside a variable template. (Separately, it'd
be nice to track referenced-ness for templates, and warn on unused ones, but
that's really a distinct issue...)
Move a test that generates and tests a warning-suppressing error out to its own
test file, so it doesn't have weird effects on the other tests in the same file.
llvm-svn: 205448
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
Summary:
Declaring a function as inline after it has been defined is in violation
of [dcl.fct.spec]p4. The program would get a strong definition instead
of getting a function with linkonce_odr linkage.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3220
llvm-svn: 205129
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
Taking a hint from -Wparentheses, use an extra '()' as a sigil that
a dead condition is intentionally dead. For example:
if ((0)) { dead }
When this sigil is found, do not emit a dead code warning. When the
analysis sees:
if (0)
it suggests inserting '()' as a Fix-It.
llvm-svn: 205069
The main difference between __va_start and __builtin_va_start is that
the address of the va_list has already been taken, and the va_list is
always a char*.
__va_end and __va_arg are not needed.
llvm-svn: 204821
specialization from a module. (This can also happen for function template
specializations in PCHs if they're instantiated eagerly, because they're
constexpr or have a deduced return type.)
llvm-svn: 204547
The exception is return statements that include control-flow,
which are clearly doing something "interesting".
99% of the cases I examined for -Wunreachable-code that fired
on return statements were not interesting enough to warrant
being in -Wunreachable-code by default. Thus the move to
include them in -Wunreachable-code-return.
This simplifies a bunch of logic, including removing the ad hoc
logic to look for std::string literals.
llvm-svn: 204307
"No need to issue deprecated warning if deprecated method
in class extension is being implemented in primary class implementation
(no overriding is involved).
// rdar://16249335". No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 204159
warnings (warning or lack there of) as well since
blocks are another pattern for envoking other
designated initializers. // rdar://16323233
llvm-svn: 204081
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
'init' methods which are unavailable. Subclasses of NSObject
have to implement such methods as a common pattern to prevent
user's own implementation. // rdar://16305460
llvm-svn: 203984
complete. We hook into this check from a couple of other places (modules,
debug info) so it's not OK to elide the check if the type was already
complete.
llvm-svn: 203978
(for an integer too large for any signed type) from Warning to ExtWarn -- it's
ill-formed in C++11 and C99 onwards, and UB during translation in C89 and
C++98. Add diagnostic groups for two relevant diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 203974
'init' methods which are unavailable. Subclasses of NSObject
have to implement such methods as a common pattern to prevent
user's own implementation. // rdar://16305460
llvm-svn: 203966
This patch factors the bodies of 9 constructors out into a single initialization
method.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3059
llvm-svn: 203846
Apparently the FIXME was overlooked when the source location information was
made available to the function.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3058
llvm-svn: 203845
Drive-by fixing some incorrect types where a for loop would be improperly using ObjCInterfaceDecl::protocol_iterator. No functional changes in these cases.
llvm-svn: 203842
const-qualified parameter type and the defined with a non-const-qualified
parameter type, the parameter is not const inside its body. Ensure that
the type we use when instantiating the body is the right one. Patch by
suyog sarda!
This is still rather unsatisfactory; it seems like it might be better to
instantiate at least the function parameters, and maybe the complete function
declaration, when we instantiate the definition for such a member function
(instead of reusing the declaration from inside the instantiated class
definition).
llvm-svn: 203741
that implicitly converts to 'bool' (such as pointers, and the first operand of
?:). Clean up issues found by this. Patch by Stephan Tolksdorf!
llvm-svn: 203735
Someone could write:
if (0) {
__c11_atomic_load(ptr, memory_order_release);
}
or the equivalent, which is perfectly valid, so we shouldn't outright reject
invalid orderings on purely static grounds.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203564
This is a conservative check, because it's valid for the expression to be
non-constant, and in cases like that we just don't know whether it's valid.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203561
if the type's declaration was previously instantiated in an unimported module.
(For an imported type definition, this already worked, because the source
location is set to the location of the definition, but for locally-instantiated
type definitions, it did not.)
llvm-svn: 203425
Clang might crash while reading the precompiled headers if
we don't initialize the AttrEnumOperandLoc properly.
This commit fixes the combination of string attribute
operand and enum operand. Besides, this commit also adds
several assertions to avoid unexpected operand kind.
llvm-svn: 203416
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
getTypeSize (which rounds up sizes) in order to issue diagnostics
when casting to mismatched vector sizes; instead of crashing in IRGen.
// rdar:// 16196902. Reviewed offline by John McCall.
llvm-svn: 203175
Note that for backwards compatibility, an unnamed capability will default to being a "mutex." This allows the deprecated lockable attribute to continue to function.
llvm-svn: 203012
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
Per more discussion, 'objc_protocol_requires_explicit_implementation' is
refinement that it mainly adds that requirement that a protocol must be
explicitly satisfied at the moment the first class in the class hierarchy
conforms to it. Any subclasses that also conform to that protocol,
either directly or via conforming to a protocol that inherits that protocol,
do not need to re-implement that protocol.
Doing this requires first doing a pass on the super class hierarchy,
gathering the set of protocols conformed to by the super classes,
and then culling those out when determining conformance. This
two-pass algorithm could be generalized for all protocol checking,
and could possibly be a performance win in some cases. For now
we restrict this change to protocols with this attribute to isolate
the change in logic (especially as the design continues to evolve).
This change needs to be adjusted for properties as well; this
only impacts methods right now.
llvm-svn: 202948
const char *format = "%s";
std::experimental::string_view view = "foo";
printf(format, view);
In this case, not only warn about a class type being used here, but also suggest that calling c_str() might be a good idea.
llvm-svn: 202461
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
null comparison when the pointer is known to be non-null.
This catches the array to pointer decay, function to pointer decay and
address of variables. This does not catch address of function since this
has been previously used to silence a warning.
Pointer to bool conversion is under -Wbool-conversion.
Pointer to null comparison is under -Wtautological-pointer-compare, a sub-group
of -Wtautological-compare.
void foo() {
int arr[5];
int x;
// warn on these conditionals
if (foo);
if (arr);
if (&x);
if (foo == null);
if (arr == null);
if (&x == null);
if (&foo); // no warning
}
llvm-svn: 202216
The warnings fall into three groups.
1) Using an absolute value function of the wrong type, for instance, using the
int absolute value function when the argument is a floating point type.
2) Using the improper sized absolute value function, for instance, using abs
when the argument is a long long. llabs should be used instead.
From these two cases, an implicit conversion will occur which may cause
unexpected behavior. Where possible, suggest the proper absolute value
function to use, and which header to include if the function is not available.
3) Taking the absolute value of an unsigned value. In addition to this warning,
suggest to remove the function call. This usually indicates a logic error
since the programmer assumed negative values would have been possible.
llvm-svn: 202211
The __forceinline keyword's semantics are now recast as AlwaysInline and
the kw___forceinline token has its language mode set for KEYMS.
This preserves the semantics of the previous implementation but with
less duplication of code.
llvm-svn: 202131
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851
llvm-svn: 202046
Most 64-bit targets define int64_t as long int, and AArch64 should
make same definition to follow LP64 model. In GNU tool chain, int64_t
is defined as long int for 64-bit target. So to get consistent with GNU,
it's better Changing int64_t from 'long long int' to 'long int',
otherwise clang will get different name mangling suffix compared with g++.
llvm-svn: 202004
The language forbids defining enums in prototypes, so this check is normally
redundant, but if an enum is defined during template instantiation it should
not be added to the prototype scope.
While at it, clean up the code that deals with tag definitions in prototype
scope and expand the visibility warning to cover the case where an anonymous
enum is defined.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2742
llvm-svn: 201927
It was previously thought that Sema::InstantiateClass could not fail
from within this point in instantiate.
However, it can happen if the class is invalid some way (i.e. invalid
base specifier).
This fixes PR18907.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2850
llvm-svn: 201913
In particular, if we see an @property within the @interface of a class
conforming to a protocol with this attribute, we treat that as
if the implementation were available, per the rules of default
property synthesis.
llvm-svn: 201911
Because GCC incorrectly defines _mm_prefetch to take anything that casts
to void*, people have started using that behavior. The previous patch
that made _mm_prefetch actually take a const char * broke compatibility
with existing code. This update to the patch leaves the macro that
defines _mm_prefetch with the (void*) cast when _MSC_VER is not defined.
llvm-svn: 201901
We're going to extend DiagnoseUnimplementedProperties shortly to look for more cases
that aren't handled by default property synthesis.
llvm-svn: 201878
This does;
- clang_tablegen() adds each tblgen'd target to global property CLANG_TABLEGEN_TARGETS as list.
- List of targets is added to LLVM_COMMON_DEPENDS.
- all clang libraries and targets depend on generated headers.
You might wonder this would be regression, but in fact, this is little loss.
- Almost all of clang libraries depend on tblgen'd files and clang-tblgen.
- clang-tblgen may cause short stall-out but doesn't cause unconditional rebuild.
- Each library's dependencies to tblgen'd files might vary along headers' structure.
It made hard to track and update *really optimal* dependencies.
Each dependency to intrinsics_gen and ClangSACheckers is left as DEPENDS.
llvm-svn: 201842
This breaks backwards compatibility with existing code. Previously, this
was defined as
#define _mm_prefetch(a, sel) (__builtin_prefetch((void *)(a), 0, (sel)))
Which basically accepts any pointer. Changing this to char* simply
breaks a lot of existing code. I have tried changing char* to
"const void*", which seems to be the right thing as per Intel
specification this should work on basically any pointer. However,
apparently this breaks windows compatibility (because of a conflicting
declaration in windows.h).
So, we probably need to #ifdef this based on whether clang is compiling
for windows. According to Chandler, this might be done by introducing an
additional symbol to a fake type in BuiltinsX86.def and then condition
the type expansion on the platform.
llvm-svn: 201775
This patch adds several built-ins that are required for ms
compatibility. _mm_prefetch must be a built-in because it takes a
compile-time constant argument and our prior approach of using a #define
to the current built-in doesn't work in the presence of re-declaration
of _mm_prefetch. The others can be obtained by including the windows
system headers. If a user includes the windows system headers but not
intrin.h they still need to work and therefore must be built-in because
we don't get a chance to implement them in intrin.h in this case.
llvm-svn: 201734
There are two kinds of automatically generated tests for NEON intrinsics, both
of which can be merged without adversely affecting users.
1. We check that a valid kind of __builtin_neon_XYZ overload is requested (e.g.
we're not asking for a float32x4_t version when it only accepts integers. Since
the __builtin_neon_XYZ intrinsics should only be used in arm_neon.h, relaxing
this test and permitting AArch64 types for AArch32 should not cause a problem.
The extra arm_neon.h definitions should be #ifdefed out anyway.
2. We check that intrinsics which take immediates are actually given
compile-time constants within range. Since all NEON intrinsics should be
backwards compatible, these tests should be identical on AArch64 and AArch32
anyway.
This patch, therefore, merges the separate AArch64 and 32-bit checks.
rdar://problem/16035743
llvm-svn: 201659
DR18 previously forebode typedefs to be used as parameter types if they
were of type 'void'. DR577 allows 'void' to be used as a function
parameter type regardless from where it came.
llvm-svn: 201631
This warning has a whole bunch of known false positives, much of them due
to code that is "sometimes unreachable". This can caused by code that
is conditionally generated by the preprocessor, branches that are defined
in terms of architecture-specific details (e.g., the size of a type), and
so on. While these are all good things to address one by one, the reality
is that this warning has received little love lately. By restricting
its purvue, we can focus on the top issues effecting main files, which
should be smaller, and then gradually widen the scope.
llvm-svn: 201607
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
temporary in a decltype expression only applies if that temporary was created
by a function call, not by a function-style cast or other flavour of
expression.
llvm-svn: 201542
and the class name is shadowed by another member. Recovery still needs
to be figured out, which is non-trivial since the parser has already gone
down a much different path than if it had recognized the class template
as type instead of seeing the member that shadowed the class template.
llvm-svn: 201360
These features are new in VS 2013 and are necessary in order to layout
std::ostream correctly. Currently we have an ABI incompatibility when
self-hosting with the 2013 stdlib in our convertible_fwd_ostream wrapper
in gtest.
This change adds another implicit attribute, MSVtorDispAttr, because
implicit attributes are currently the best way to make sure the
information stays on class templates through instantiation.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2746
llvm-svn: 201274
Previously, range checking on the __builtin_neon_XYZ_v Clang intrinsics didn't
take account of the type actually passed to the call, which meant a request
like "vext_s16(a, b, 7)" was allowed through (TableGen was conservative and
allowed 0-7 for all types). This caused an assert in the backend because the
lane doesn't make sense.
llvm-svn: 201232
These flags control the inheritance model initially used by the
translation unit.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2741
llvm-svn: 201175
Thanks to r199467, __attribute__((nonnull)) (without arguments) can apply
directly to parameters, instead of being applied to the whole function.
However, the old form of nonnull (with an argument index) could also apply
to the arguments of function and block pointers, and both of these can be
passed as parameters.
Now, if 'nonnull' with an argument is found on a parameter, /and/ the
parameter is a function or block pointer, it is handled the old way.
PR18795
llvm-svn: 201162
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
llvm-svn: 201105
Rather than simply saying "X is not a class or namespace", clarify what
X is by providing the aka type in the case where X is a type, or
pointing to the named declaration if there's an unambiguous one to refer
to. In the ambiguous case, the ambiguities are already enumerated
(though could be clarified by describing what kind of entities they are)
Included a few FIXMEs in tests where some further improvements could be
made.
llvm-svn: 201038
template parameters, don't look for parameters of outer templates. If a problem
is found in a default template argument, point the diagnostic at the partial
specialization (with a note pointing at the default argument) instead of
pointing it at the default argument and leaving it unclear which partial
specialization os problematic.
llvm-svn: 201031
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
'operator delete' or 'operator delete[]' is an explicit exception
specification. Therefore we should diagnose 'void operator delete(void*)'
instead of 'void operator delete(void*) noexcept'.
This diagnostic remains an ExtWarn, since in practice people don't always
include the exception specification in such a declaration.
llvm-svn: 201002
If we are in the middle of defining the class, don't attempt to
validate previously annotated declarations. We may not have seen base
specifiers or virtual method declarations yet.
llvm-svn: 200959
type-dependent variable, even if the initializer isn't value-dependent. This
happens for ParenListExprs composed of non-value-dependent subexpressions, for
instance.
We should really give ParenListExprs (and InitListExprs) the type of the
initialized entity if they're used to represent a dependent initialization (and
if so, set them to be type-, value- and instantiation-dependent).
llvm-svn: 200954
Properly determine the inheritance model when dealing with nullptr:
- If a nullptr template argument is being checked against
pointer-to-member parameter, nail down an inheritance model.
N.B. We will chose an inheritance model even if we won't ultimately
choose the template to instantiate! Cooky, right?
- Null pointer-to-datamembers have a virtual base table offset of -1,
not zero. Previously, we chose an offset of 0.
llvm-svn: 200920
In the following code:
struct A { static const int sz; };
template<class T> void f() { T arr[A::sz]; }
the array 'arr' is represented as a variable size array in the template.
If 'A::sz' gets value below in the translation unit, the array in
instantiation can turn into constant size array.
This change fixes PR18633.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2688
llvm-svn: 200899
using-declaration, and they declare the same function (either because
the using-declaration is in the same namespace as the declaration it
imports, or because they're both extern "C"), they do not conflict.
llvm-svn: 200897
Because in C++, "anonymous" doesn't mean "nameless" for records. In
other words, RecordDecl::isAnonymousStructOrUnion only returns true if
the record lacks a name *and* is not used as the type in an object's
declaration.
llvm-svn: 200868
We accept these with a warning in MS mode, but we would previously mark them
invalid, causing us not to emit code for them.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2681
llvm-svn: 200815
When a lax conversion featured a vector and a non-vector, we were
only requiring the non-vector to be a scalar type, but really it
needs to be a real type (i.e. integral or real floating); it is
not reasonable to allow a pointer, member pointer, or complex
type here.
r198474 required lax conversions to match in "data size", i.e.
element size * element count, forbidding matches that happen
only because a vector is rounded up to the nearest power of two
in size. Unfortunately, the erroneous logic was repeated in
several different places; unify them to use the new condition,
so that it triggers for arbitrary conversions and not just
those performed as part of binary operator checking.
rdar://15931426
llvm-svn: 200810
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
a previously-computed linkage as an unsupportable error condition.
Per discussion on cfe-commits, this appears to be a
difficult-to-resolve flaw in our implementation approach;
we may pursue this as a language defect, but for now it's
better to diagnose it as unsupported than to produce
inconsistent results (or assertions). Anything that we can
do to limit how often this diagnostic fires, such as the
changes in r200380, is probably for the best, though.
llvm-svn: 200438
We would previously allow inappropriate inheritance keywords to appear
on class declarations. We would also allow inheritance keywords on
templates which were not fully specialized; this was divergent from
MSVC.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2585
llvm-svn: 200423
the linkage cache) when type-checking static local
variables.
There's a very deep problem here where the linkage of
a declaration can suddenly massively change as soon as
it's given a typedef name; these fixes, while optimizations
in their own right, are really just targeted workarounds.
rdar://15928125
llvm-svn: 200380
case when correcting for too many arguments (r191450 had only fixed the
problem for when there were too few arguments). Also fix the underlining
for both cases.
llvm-svn: 200268
parimary class and in mrr mode, assume property's default
memory attribute (assign) and to prevent a bogus warning.
// rdar://15859862
llvm-svn: 200238
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Previously, string literals were ignored in all logical expressions. This
reduces it to only ignore in logical and expressions.
assert(0 && "error"); // No warning
assert(0 || "error"); // Warn
Fixes PR17565
llvm-svn: 200056
MSAN detected a path that leaves DeprecatedStringLiteralToCharPtr uninitialized.
UserDefinedConversionSequence::First is a StandardConversionSequence that must
be initialized with setAsIdentityConversion.
llvm-svn: 199988
override for the type of 'this', also clear it out (unless we're entering the
context of a lambda-expression, where it should be inherited).
llvm-svn: 199962
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
Kaelyn Takata