This patch is a revert of e08f205f5c. In that patch, DW_TAG_subprograms
were permitted to be referenced across CU boundaries, to improve stack
trace construction using call site information. Unfortunately, as
documented in PR48790, the way that subprograms are "owned" by dwarf units
is sufficiently complicated that subprograms end up in unexpected units,
invalidating cross-unit references.
There's no obvious way to easily fix this, and several attempts have
failed. Revert this to ensure correct DWARF is always emitted.
Three tests change in addition to the reversion, but they're all very
light alterations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107076
Maskray has reported a fault with .debug_gnu_pubnames in the comments on
D94976, caused by this patch, reverting to investigate.
This reverts commit 8998f58435.
This modified patch avoids redirecting the unit in which a subprogram is
created if type units are enabled -- DIEs were getting children allocated
from different units memory pools. Original commit message:
[DWARF] Create subprogram's DIE in DISubprogram's unit
This is a fix for PR48790. Over in D70350, subprogram DIEs were permitted
to be shared between CUs. However, the creation of a subprogram DIE can be
triggered early, from other CUs. The subprogram definition is then created
in one CU, and when the function is actually emitted children are attached
to the subprogram that expect to be in another CU. This breaks internal CU
references in the children.
Fix this by redirecting the creation of subprogram DIEs in
getOrCreateContextDIE to the CU specified by it's DISubprogram definition.
This ensures that the subprogram DIE is always created in the correct CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94976
This reverts commit ef0dcb5063.
This change is causing a lot of compiler crashes inside, sorry I don't have a
small repro/stacktrace with symbols to share right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95622
This is a fix for PR48790. Over in D70350, subprogram DIEs were permitted
to be shared between CUs. However, the creation of a subprogram DIE can be
triggered early, from other CUs. The subprogram definition is then created
in one CU, and when the function is actually emitted children are attached
to the subprogram that expect to be in another CU. This breaks internal CU
references in the children.
Fix this by redirecting the creation of subprogram DIEs in
getOrCreateContextDIE to the CU specified by it's DISubprogram definition.
This ensures that the subprogram DIE is always created in the correct CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94976
Jeremy Morse