Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
`distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
support.
The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.
The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.
A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:
!named = !{!0}
!0 = !DIExpression()
Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:
!named = !{!DIExpression()}
This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:
!named = !{!0}
; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
!0 = distinct !DIExpression()
Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
Verify that the resolver exists, that it is a defined
Function, and that its return type matches the ifunc's
type. Add corresponding check to BitcodeReader, change
clang to emit the correct type, and fix tests to comply.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Thinlink provides an opportunity to propagate function attributes across modules, enabling additional propagation opportunities.
This change propagates (currently default off, turn on with `disable-thinlto-funcattrs=1`) noRecurse and noUnwind based off of function summaries of the prevailing functions in bottom-up call-graph order. Testing on clang self-build:
1. There's a 35-40% increase in noUnwind functions due to the additional propagation opportunities.
2. Throughput is measured at 10-15% increase in thinlink time which itself is 1.5% of E2E link time.
Implementation-wise this adds the following summary function attributes:
1. noUnwind: function is noUnwind
2. mayThrow: function contains a non-call instruction that `Instruction::mayThrow` returns true on (e.g. windows SEH instructions)
3. hasUnknownCall: function contains calls that don't make it into the summary call-graph thus should not be propagated from (e.g. indirect for now, could add no-opt functions as well)
Testing:
Clang self-build passes and 2nd stage build passes check-all
ninja check-all with newly added tests passing
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36850
SelectionDAG will promote illegal types up to a power of 2 before
splitting down to a legal type. This will create an IntegerType
with a bit width that must be <= MAX_INT_BITS. This places an
effective upper limit on any type of 2^23 so that we don't try
create a 2^24 type.
I considered putting a fatal error somewhere in the path from
TargetLowering::getTypeConversion down to IntegerType::get, but
limiting the type in IR seemed better.
This breaks backwards compatibility with IR that is using a really
large type. I suspect such IR is going to be very rare due to the
the compile time costs such a type likely incurs.
Prevents the ICE in PR51829.
Reviewed By: efriedma, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109721
Currently, opaque pointers are supported in two forms: The
-force-opaque-pointers mode, where all pointers are opaque and
typed pointers do not exist. And as a simple ptr type that can
coexist with typed pointers.
This patch removes support for the mixed mode. You either get
typed pointers, or you get opaque pointers, but not both. In the
(current) default mode, using ptr is forbidden. In -opaque-pointers
mode, all pointers are opaque.
The motivation here is that the mixed mode introduces additional
issues that don't exist in fully opaque mode. D105155 is an example
of a design problem. Looking at D109259, it would probably need
additional work to support mixed mode (e.g. to generate GEPs for
typed base but opaque result). Mixed mode will also end up
inserting many casts between i8* and ptr, which would require
significant additional work to consistently avoid.
I don't think the mixed mode is particularly valuable, as it
doesn't align with our end goal. The only thing I've found it to
be moderately useful for is adding some opaque pointer tests in
between typed pointer tests, but I think we can live without that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109290
Functions can have a personality function, as well as prefix and
prologue data as additional operands. Unused operands are assigned
a dummy value of i1* null. This patch addresses multiple issues in
use-list order preservation for these:
* Fix verify-uselistorder to also enumerate the dummy values.
This means that now use-list order values of these values are
shuffled even if there is no other mention of i1* null in the
module. This results in failures of Assembler/call-arg-is-callee.ll,
Assembler/opaque-ptr.ll and Bitcode/use-list-order2.ll.
* The use-list order prediction in ValueEnumerator does not take
into account the fact that a global may use a value more than
once and leaves uses in the same global effectively unordered.
We should be comparing the operand number here, as we do for
the more general case.
* While we enumerate all operands of a function together (which
seems sensible to me), the bitcode reader would first resolve
prefix data for all function, then prologue data for all
functions, then personality functions for all functions. Change
this to resolve all operands for a given function together
instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109282
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824`
roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.
While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles
the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB,
and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that;
On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).
So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments,
which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds
zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.
I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure,
and since we don't explicitly record the IR version,
we don't need to bump one either.
As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519,
this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation
of the `getAlignment()` functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661
The intent of the negative #{{.*}} checks is to verify that the line
declaring/defining a function has no attribute, but they could restrict
later function declarations instead.
The 2008-09-02-FunctionNotes.ll check had allowed @fn3 to have an
attribute, because there is only a single "define void @fn3()" in the
output.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107614
Continuing on from D105780, this should be the last major bit of
attribute cleanup. Currently, LLParser implements attribute parsing
for functions, parameters and returns separately, enumerating all
supported (and unsupported) attributes each time. This patch
extracts the common parsing logic, and performs a check afterwards
whether the attribute is valid in the given position. Parameters
and returns are handled together, while function attributes need
slightly different logic to support attribute groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105938
It is possible that the remangled name for an intrinsic already exists with a different (and wrong) prototype within the module.
As the bitcode reader keeps both versions of all remangled intrinsics around for a longer time, this can result in a
crash, as can be seen in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50923
This patch makes 'remangleIntrinsicFunction' aware of this situation. When it is detected, it moves the version with the wrong prototype to a different name. That version will be removed anyway once the module is completely loaded.
With thanks to @asbirlea for reporting this issue when trying out an lto build with the full restrict patches, and @efriedma for suggesting a sane resolution mechanism.
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105118
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854.
It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
This adds support for opaque pointers in intrinsic type checks
of IIT kind Pointer and PtrToElt.
This is less straight-forward than it might initially seem, because
we should only accept opaque pointers here in --force-opaque-pointers
mode. Otherwise, there would be more than one valid type signature
for a given intrinsic name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105155
For example, byval.
Skip the type attribute auto-upgrade if we already have the type.
I've actually seen this error of the ValueEnumerator missing a type
attribute's type in a non-opaque pointer context.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105138
4506f614cb fixed parsing of textual IR to
reject `ptr*`, but broke the auto-conversion of `i32**` to `ptr` with
`--force-opaque-pointers`.
Get that working again by refactoring LLParser::parseType to only send
`ptr`-spelled pointers into the type suffix logic when it's the return
of a function type. This also rejects `ptr addrspace(3) addrspace(2)`,
which 1e6303e60c invadvertently started
accepting. Just the default top-level error message for the
double-addrspace since I had trouble thinking of something nice;
probably it's fine as is (it doesn't look valid the way that `ptr*`
does).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105146
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
`distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
support.
The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.
The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.
A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:
!named = !{!0}
!0 = !DIExpression()
Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:
!named = !{!DIExpression()}
This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:
!named = !{!0}
; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
!0 = distinct !DIExpression()
Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
Currently, AsmWriter will stick uselistorder directives for global
values inside individual functions. This doesn't make a lot of sense,
and interacts badly with D104950, as use list order adjustments will
be performed while still working on a forward reference.
This patch instead always prints uselistorder directives for globals
at the module level. This isn't really compatible with the previously
used implementation approach. Rather than walking through all values
again, use the OrderMap (after stabilizing its order) to go through
all values and compute the use list shuffles for them. Classify them
per-function, or nullptr for globals.
Even independently of D104950, this seems to fix a few
verify-uselistorder failures. Conveniently, there is even a
pre-existing failing test that this fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104976
Fix the use-list-order for br instructions by setting the operands in
order of their index to match the use-list-order prediction. The case
where this matters is when there is a condition but the if-true and
if-false branches are identical.
Bug was found when reviewing failures pointed at by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104950. Fix is similar to
3cf415c6c3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104959
Bring back the testcase dropped in
1e6303e60c and get it passing by checking
explicitly for `ptr*` in LLParser. Uses `Type::isOpaquePointerTy()` from
ad4bb82809.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104938
Do this by making opaque pointers a valid pointer element type,
for which we implicitly create an opaque pointer (moving the logic
from getPointerTo into PointerType::get).
We'll never create something like a "pointer to opaque pointer",
but accept it in the API, because a lot of code reasonably assumes
that you can create a pointer to pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104902
Fix the use-list-order for call and invoke instructions by setting the
operands in order of their index. This matches the use-list-order
prediction. Note that the verifier precludes sharing operands in callbr
(so there was no bug to fix), but that code was updated for consistency.
Bug was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104805
Add support for call of opaque pointer, currently only possible for
indirect calls.
This requires a bit of special casing in LLParser, as calls do not
specify the callee operand type explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740
Adjust assertions to use isOpaqueOrPointeeTypeMatches() and make
it return an opaque pointer result for an opaque base pointer. We
also need to enumerate the element type, as it is no longer
implicitly enumerated through the pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104655
For a GEP on an opaque pointer, also return an opaque pointer (or
vector of opaque pointer) result.
This requires explicitly enumerating the GEP source element type,
because it is now no longer implicitly enumerated as part of either
the source or result pointer types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104652
Verifying opaque pointer as function parameter when using with `byval`, `byref`,
`inalloca`, `preallocated`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104309
Ensure that we provide a `Module` when checking if a rename of an intrinsic is necessary.
This fixes the issue that was detected by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32288
(as mentioned by @fhahn), after committing D91250.
Note that the `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName` is being deprecated in favor of `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName2`.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99173
`non-global-value-max-name-size` is used by `Value` to cap the length of local value name. However, this flag is not considered by `LLParser`, which leads to unexpected `use of undefined value error`. The fix is to move the responsibility of capping the length to `ValueSymbolTable`.
The test is the one provided by [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45899 | Mikael in the bug report ]].
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102707
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.
Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.
Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
In the WebAssembly target, we would like to allow alloca in two address
spaces. The alloca instruction already has an address space argument,
but the verifier asserts that the address space of an alloca is the
default alloca address space from the datalayout. This patch removes
this restriction. Targets that would like to impose additional
restrictions should do so via target-specific verification passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101045
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
No verifier changes needed, the verifier currently doesn't check that
the pointer operand's pointee type matches the GEP type. There is a
similar check in GetElementPtrInst::Create() though.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102744
Don't check that types match when the pointer operand is an opaque
pointer.
I would separate the Assembler and Verifier changes, but
verify-uselistorder in the Assembler test ends up running the verifier.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102450
The opaque pointer type is essentially just a normal pointer type with a
null pointee type.
This also adds support for the opaque pointer type to the bitcode
reader/writer, as well as to textual IR.
To avoid confusion with existing pointer types, we disallow creating a
pointer to an opaque pointer.
Opaque pointer types should not be widely used at this point since many
parts of LLVM still do not support them. The next steps are to add some
very simple use cases of opaque pointers to make sure they work, then
start pretending that all pointers are opaque pointers and see what
breaks.
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150359.html
Reviewed By: dblaikie, dexonsmith, pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101704
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
Perform DSOLocal propagation within summary list of every GV. This
avoids the repeated query of this information during function
importing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96398
Arthur Eubanks