something like "display/4i $pc" (or something like this). With LLDB we already
were showing 3 lines of source before and 3 lines of source after the current
source line when showing a stop context. We now improve this by allowing the
user to control the number of lines with the new "stop-line-count-before" and
"stop-line-count-after" settings. Also, there is a new setting for how many
disassembly lines to show: "stop-disassembly-count". This will control how many
source lines are shown when there is no source or when we have no source line
info.
settings set stop-line-count-before 3
settings set stop-line-count-after 3
settings set stop-disassembly-count 4
settings set stop-disassembly-display no-source
The default values are set as shown above and allow 3 lines of source before
and after (what we used to do) the current stop location, and will display 4
lines of disassembly if the source is not available or if we have no debug
info. If both "stop-source-context-before" and "stop-source-context-after" are
set to zero, this will disable showing any source when stopped. The
"stop-disassembly-display" setting is an enumeration that allows you to control
when to display disassembly. It has 3 possible values:
"never" - never show disassembly no matter what
"no-source" - only show disassembly when there is no source line info or the source files are missing
"always" - always show disassembly.
llvm-svn: 145050
semantics and defaults as the corresponding g++ arguments. The historical g++
argument -ftemplate-depth-N is kept for compatibility, but modern g++ versions
no longer document that option.
Add -cc1 argument -fconstexpr-depth N to implement the corresponding
functionality.
The -ftemplate-depth=N part of this fixes PR9890.
llvm-svn: 145045
output files that are valid regardless of whether the compilation
succeeded or failed (but not if we crash). Add depfiles to the
failure result file list.
llvm-svn: 145018
properly account for the *global* probability of the edge being taken.
This manifested as a very large number of unconditional branches to
blocks being merged against the CFG even though they weren't
particularly hot within the CFG.
The fix is to check whether the edge being merged is both locally hot
relative to other successors for the source block, and globally hot
compared to other (unmerged) predecessors of the destination block.
This introduces a new crasher on GCC single-source, but it's currently
behind a flag, and Ben has offered to work on the reduction. =]
llvm-svn: 145010
is actually being tested. Also add some FileCheck goodness to much more
carefully ensure that the result is the desired result. Before this test
would only have failed through an assert failure if the underlying fix
were reverted.
Also, add some weight metadata and a comment explaining exactly what is
going on to a trick section of the test case. Originally, we were
getting very unlucky and trying to form a block chain that isn't
actually profitable. I'm working on a fix to avoid forming these
unprofitable chains, and that would also have masked any failure from
this test case. The easy solution is to add some metadata that makes it
*really* profitable to form the bad chain here.
llvm-svn: 145006
formation phase and into the initial walk of the basic blocks. We
essentially pre-merge all blocks where unanalyzable fallthrough exists,
as we won't be able to update the terminators effectively after any
reorderings. This is quite a bit more principled as there may be CFGs
where the second half of the unanalyzable pair has some analyzable
predecessor that gets placed first. Then it may get placed next,
implicitly breaking the unanalyzable branch even though we never even
looked at the part that isn't analyzable. I've included a test case that
triggers this (thanks Benjamin yet again!), and I'm hoping to synthesize
some more general ones as I dig into related issues.
Also, to make this new scheme work we have to be able to handle branches
into the middle of a chain, so add this check. We always fallback on the
incoming ordering.
Finally, this starts to really underscore a known limitation of the
current implementation -- we don't consider broken predecessors when
merging successors. This can caused major missed opportunities, and is
something I'm planning on looking at next (modulo more bug reports).
llvm-svn: 144994
- With the current implementation of sys::Program this always printed "2".
- The command execution code will output the right number anyway (including the signal name).
llvm-svn: 144993
Craig Topper