It seems virtually everyone who tries to do LTO build with Clang and
LLD was hit by a mistake to forget using llvm-ar command to create
archive files. I wasn't an exception. Since this is an annoying common
issue, it is probably better to handle that gracefully rather than
reporting an error and tell the user to redo build with different
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32721
llvm-svn: 302083
Previously, undefined symbol errors are one line like this
and wasn't easy to read.
/ssd/clang/bin/ld.lld: error: /ssd/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Writer.cpp:207: undefined symbol 'lld:🧝:EhFrameSection<llvm::object::ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0, true> >::addSection(lld:🧝:InputSectionBase*)'
This patch make it more structured like this.
bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: lld:🧝:EhFrameSection<llvm::object::ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0, true>
>>> Referenced by Writer.cpp:207 (/ssd/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Writer.cpp:207)
>>> Writer.cpp.o in archive lib/liblldELF.a
Discussion thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-March/111459.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31481
llvm-svn: 299097
Summary: In the ELF linker, we create the buffer identifier for bitcode files by appending the object name to the archive name. This change makes the COFF linker do the same. Without the change, ThinLTO builds can fail with an error message about multiple ThinLTO modules per object file, caused by object files contained in different archives having the same name.
Reviewers: pcc, ruiu
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31402
llvm-svn: 298942
Rui Ueyama