Fix the sort of expected order in the reader to correctly return `false`
when comparing a `Use` against itself.
This was caught by test/Bitcode/binaryIntInstructions.3.2.ll, so I'm
adding a `RUN` line using `llvm-uselistorder` for every test in
`test/Bitcode` that passes.
A few tests still fail, so I'll investigate those next.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214157
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214139
Since we're storing lots of these, save two-pointers per vector with a
custom type rather than using the relatively heavy `SmallVector`.
Part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214135
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214125
Typedef DIArray to DITypedArray<DIDescriptor>. Also typedef DITypeArray as
DITypedArray<DITypeRef>.
This is the third of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214115
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This is the first of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit makes sure unspecified_parameter is a DIType to enable converting
the type array for a subroutine type to an array of DITypes.
This commit should have no functionality change. With this commit, we may
change unspecified type to be a DITrivialType instead of a DIType.
llvm-svn: 214111
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
use is deprecated in favour of llvm_map_components_to_libnames()
Although message(DEPRECATION "msg") would probably be a better fit this
does nothing if CMAKE_ERROR_DEPRECATED and CMAKE_WARNING_DEPRECATED are
both off, which is the default.
llvm-svn: 214078
While LLVM now supports both ELFv1 and ELFv2 ABIs, their use is currently
hard-coded via the target triple: powerpc64-linux is always ELFv1, while
powerpc64le-linux is always ELFv2.
These are of course the most common scenarios, but in principle it is
possible to support the ELFv2 ABI on big-endian or the ELFv1 ABI on
little-endian systems (and GCC does support that), and there are some
special use cases for that (e.g. certain Linux kernel versions could
only be built using ELFv1 on LE).
This patch implements the LLVM side of supporting this. As precedent
on other platforms suggests, ABI options are passed to the back-end as
features. Thus, this patch implements two features "elfv1" and "elfv2"
that select the desired ABI if present. (If not, the LLVM uses the
same default rules as now.)
llvm-svn: 214072
These are only used when the 'ld' in the path is gold and the plugin has
been built, but it is already a start to make sure we don't regress features
that cannot be tested with llvm-lto.
llvm-svn: 214058
The subtarget information is the ultimate source of truth for the feature set
that is enabled at this point. We would previously not propagate the feature
information to the subtarget. While this worked for the most part (features
would be enabled/disabled as requested), if another operation that changed the
feature bits was encountered (such as a mode switch via a .arm or .thumb
directive), we would end up resetting the behaviour of the architectural
extensions.
Handling this properly requires a slightly more complicated handling. We need
to check if the feature is now being toggled. If so, only then do we toggle the
features. In return, we no longer have to calculate the feature bits ourselves.
The test changes are mostly to the diagnosis, which is now more uniform (a nice
side effect!). Add an additional test to ensure that we handle this case
properly.
Thanks to Nico Weber for alerting me to this issue!
llvm-svn: 214057
Rename to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess.
On R600, 8 and 16 byte accesses are mostly OK with 4-byte alignment,
and don't need to be split into multiple accesses. Vector loads with
an alignment of the element type are not uncommon in OpenCL code.
llvm-svn: 214055
'J' represents a negative number suitable for an add/sub alias
instruction, but while preparing it to become an int64_t we were
mangling the sign extension. So "i32 -1" became 0xffffffffLL, for
example.
Should fix one half of PR20456.
llvm-svn: 214052
instructions in the legalized DAG, and leverage it to combine long
sequences of instructions to PSHUFB.
Eventually, the other x86-instruction-specific shuffle combines will
probably all be driven out of this routine. But the real motivation is
to detect after we have fully legalized and optimized a shuffle to the
minimal number of x86 instructions whether it is profitable to replace
the chain with a fully generic PSHUFB instruction even though doing so
requires either a load from a constant pool or tying up a register with
the mask.
While the Intel manuals claim it should be used when it replaces 5 or
more instructions (!!!!) my experience is that it is actually very fast
on modern chips, and so I've gon with a much more aggressive model of
replacing any sequence of 3 or more instructions.
I've also taught it to do some basic canonicalization to special-purpose
instructions which have smaller encodings than their generic
counterparts.
There are still quite a few FIXMEs here, and I've not yet implemented
support for lowering blends with PSHUFB (where its power really shines
due to being able to zero out lanes), but this starts implementing real
PSHUFB support even when using the new, fancy shuffle lowering. =]
llvm-svn: 214042
checking whether the ArrayRef is equal to an explicit list of arguments.
This is particularly easy to implement even without variadic templates
because ArrayRef happens to be homogeneously typed. As a consequence we
can use a "clever" wrapper type and default arguments to capture in
a single method many arguments as well as *how many* arguments the user
specified.
Thanks to Dave Blaikie for helping me pull together this little helper.
Suggestions for how to improve or generalize it are of course welcome.
I'll be using it immediately in my follow-up patch. =D
llvm-svn: 214041
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith