Fix the sort of expected order in the reader to correctly return `false`
when comparing a `Use` against itself.
This was caught by test/Bitcode/binaryIntInstructions.3.2.ll, so I'm
adding a `RUN` line using `llvm-uselistorder` for every test in
`test/Bitcode` that passes.
A few tests still fail, so I'll investigate those next.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214157
The -mstrict-align option was originally added in r167619 as a target-
independent option. It was then changed in r167623 to be implemented with an
ARM-specific backend option, even though the code remained in the
target-independent Clang::ConstructJob function. This means that if you used
the -mstrict-align option with a non-ARM target, you would still get the
-arm-strict-align option getting passed to the backend, which was harmless
but gross. The driver option was then replaced by the GCC-compatible
-m[no-]unaligned-access option (r189175) and modified to work with AArch64
(r208075). However, in the process, the help text for -mstrict-align was
incorrectly changed to show it as only being supported for AArch64. Even worse,
the logic for handling these options together with -mkernel was wrong for
AArch64, where -mkernel does not currently imply strict alignment.
This patch fixes up all of those things. Besides the obvious change to the
option help text, it moves the logic into the ARM and AArch64-specific parts
of the driver, so that the option will be correctly ignored for non-ARM
targets. <rdar://problem/17823697>
llvm-svn: 214148
This isn't nearly as elaborate as the GCC inline asm which emits an
array of source locations, but it's very, very hard to trigger backend
diagnostics in MS inline asm because we parse it up front with good
source information, unlike GCC inline asm.
Currently I can trigger a "inline assembly requires more registers than
available" diagnostic with this code:
void foo();
void bar() {
__asm pusha
__asm call foo
__asm popa
}
However, if I committed that as a test case, I would have to remove it
once I fix PR20052.
llvm-svn: 214141
All iOS arm processor support switching between arm and thumb mode at call sites
by using the BLX instruction (instead of BL). But the compiler does not know
the implementation mode for extern functions, so the linker must update BL/BLX
instructions to match what is linked is actually linked together. In addition,
pointers to functions (such as vtables) must have the low bit set if the target
of the pointer is a thumb mode function.
llvm-svn: 214140
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214139
This was causing core dumps on MacOSX and was not properly
cleaning up the state of the inferior before exiting.
The test was overriding def tearDown(), but failed to
call the base class after doing its own cleanup. This
essentially eliminated normal clean-up activity.
llvm-svn: 214138
Since we're storing lots of these, save two-pointers per vector with a
custom type rather than using the relatively heavy `SmallVector`.
Part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214135
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214125
char-based types from "char" to "signed char". Adjust stdint.h to use
__INTx_TYPE__ directly without prefixing it with signed and to use
__UINTx_TYPE__ for unsigned ones.
The value of __INTx_TYPE__ now matches GCC.
llvm-svn: 214119
Typedef DIArray to DITypedArray<DIDescriptor>. Also typedef DITypeArray as
DITypedArray<DITypeRef>.
This is the third of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214115
Pass target name ("cxxabi") to target_link_libraries(cxx ...) to ensure
that linker is able to locate just-built libc++abi in the build tree,
instead of relying on "-lc++abi" linker flag.
llvm-svn: 214114
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This is the first of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit makes sure unspecified_parameter is a DIType to enable converting
the type array for a subroutine type to an array of DITypes.
This commit should have no functionality change. With this commit, we may
change unspecified type to be a DITrivialType instead of a DIType.
llvm-svn: 214111
The new flag, WantFunctionLikeCasts, covers a subset of the keywords
covered by WantTypeSpecifiers that can be used in casts that look like
function calls, e.g. "return long(5);", while excluding the keywords
like "enum" and "const" that would be included when WantTypeSpecifiers
is true but cannot be used in something that looks like a function call.
llvm-svn: 214109
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith