The new info is propagated to TSTLoc on template instantiation, getting rid of 3 FIXMEs in TreeTransform.h and another one Parser.cpp.
Simplified code in TypeSpecLocFiller visitor methods for DTSTLoc and DependentNameTypeLoc by removing what now seems to be dead code (adding corresponding assertions).
llvm-svn: 149923
class C {
public:
static void foo2() { }
};
template <class T> class A {
public:
typedef C D;
};
template <class T> class B : public A<T> {
public:
void foo() { D::foo2(); }
};
Note that this won't work if the NestedNameSpecifier refers to a type.
This fixes 1 error when parsing the MSVC 2010 standard headers file with clang.
llvm-svn: 136203
vector<int>
to
std::vector<int>
Patch by Kaelyn Uhrain, with minor tweaks + PCH support from me. Fixes
PR5776/<rdar://problem/8652971>.
Thanks Kaelyn!
llvm-svn: 134007
nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.
llvm-svn: 131383
information. Rather than looking at the declaration kind to figure out
what TypeLoc to build, look at the type; it makes so much more
sense. Fixes <rdar://problem/9086649>.
llvm-svn: 130882
to cope with non-type templates by providing appropriate
errors. Previously, we would either assert, crash, or silently build a
dependent type when we shouldn't. Fixes PR9226.
llvm-svn: 127037
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.
llvm-svn: 126776
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.
llvm-svn: 126358
with another component in the nested-name-specifiers, updating its
representation (a NestedNameSpecifier) and source-location information
(currently a SourceRange) simultaneously. This is groundwork for
adding source-location information to nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126346
current instantiation, even though we have a RecordDecl describing
them. Fixes PR9255.
Amusingly, I've had this patch sitting around for a month or two
because it was "obviously" wrong, but hadn't gotten around to writing
a test case to submit the fix :)
llvm-svn: 126038
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
dependent bases, construct a dependent nested-name-specifier rather
than complaining that the name could not be found within the current
instantiation itself. Fixes PR7725.
llvm-svn: 109582
of a class template or class template partial specialization. That is to
say, in
template <class T> class A { ... };
or
template <class T> class B<const T*> { ... };
make 'A<T>' and 'B<const T*>' sugar for the corresponding InjectedClassNameType
when written inside the appropriate context. This allows us to track the
current instantiation appropriately even inside AST routines. It also allows
us to compute a DeclContext for a type much more efficiently, at some extra
cost every time we write a template specialization (which can be optimized,
but I've left it simple in this patch).
llvm-svn: 102407
when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.
llvm-svn: 102247
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
injected class name of a class template or class template partial specialization.
This is a non-canonical type; the canonical type is still a template
specialization type. This becomes the TypeForDecl of the pattern declaration,
which cleans up some amount of code (and complicates some other parts, but
whatever).
Fixes PR6326 and probably a few others, primarily by re-establishing a few
invariants about TypeLoc sizes.
llvm-svn: 98134
class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
in a member access expression referring into the current instantiation
need not be resolved at template definition *if* the current
instantiation has any dependent base classes. Fixes PR6081.
llvm-svn: 93877
finds nothing), and the current instantiation has dependent base
classes, treat the qualified lookup as if it referred to an unknown
specialization. Fixes PR6031.
llvm-svn: 93433
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
intended. On the first testcase in the bug, we now produce:
cxx-decl.cpp:12:2: error: unexpected ':' in nested name specifier
y:a a2;
^
::
instead of:
t.cc:8:1: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
x:a a2;
^
t.cc:8:2: error: invalid token after top level declarator
x:a a2;
^
;
t.cc:9:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a2'
x::a a3 = a2;
^
llvm-svn: 90713
LookupResult RAII powers to diagnose ambiguity in the results. Other diagnostics
(e.g. access control and deprecation) will be moved to automatically trigger
during lookup as part of this same mechanism.
This abstraction makes it much easier to encapsulate aliasing declarations
(e.g. using declarations) inside the lookup system: eventually, lookup will
just produce the aliases in the LookupResult, and the standard access methods
will naturally strip the aliases off.
llvm-svn: 89027
type of the object even when it is dependent. Specifically, this makes
sure that we get the right type for "this->", which is important when
performing name lookup into this scope to determine whether an
identifier or operator-function-id is a template name.
llvm-svn: 86060
what we found when we looked into <blah>", where <blah> is a
DeclContext*. We can now format DeclContext*'s in nice ways, e.g.,
"namespace N", "the global namespace", "'class Foo'".
This is part of PR3990, but we're not quite there yet.
llvm-svn: 84028
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
involve qualified names, e.g., x->Base::f. We now maintain enough
information in the AST to compare the results of the name lookup of
"Base" in the scope of the postfix-expression (determined at template
definition time) and in the type of the object expression.
llvm-svn: 80953
with to properly support member access expressions in templates. This
test is XFAIL'd, because we get it completely wrong, but I've made the
minimal changes to the representation to at least avoid a crash.
llvm-svn: 80856
x->Base::f
We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.
We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.
I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.
llvm-svn: 80843
qualified name does not actually refer into a class/class
template/class template partial specialization.
Improve printing of nested-name-specifiers to eliminate redudant
qualifiers. Also, make it possible to output a nested-name-specifier
through a DiagnosticBuilder, although there are relatively few places
that will use this leeway.
llvm-svn: 80056
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 80044
Fixes PR4704 problems
Addresses Eli's patch feedback re: ugly cast code
Updates all postfix operators to remove ParenListExprs. While this is awful,
no better solution (say, in the parser) is obvious to me. Better solutions
welcome.
llvm-svn: 78621
Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRecordType() -> Type::getAs<RecordType>()
Type::getAsPointerType() -> Type::getAs<PointerType>()
Type::getAsBlockPointerType() -> Type::getAs<BlockPointerType>()
Type::getAsLValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<LValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsRValueReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<RValueReferenceType>()
Type::getAsMemberPointerType() -> Type::getAs<MemberPointerType>()
Type::getAsReferenceType() -> Type::getAs<ReferenceType>()
Type::getAsTagType() -> Type::getAs<TagType>()
And remove Type::getAsReferenceType(), etc.
This change is similar to one I made a couple weeks ago, but that was partly
reverted pending some additional design discussion. With Doug's pending smart
pointer changes for Types, it seemed natural to take this approach.
llvm-svn: 77510
templates, e.g.,
template<typename T>
struct Outer {
struct Inner;
};
template<typename T>
struct Outer<T>::Inner {
// ...
};
Implementing this feature required some extensions to ActOnTag, which
now takes a set of template parameter lists, and is the precursor to
removing the ActOnClassTemplate function from the parser Action
interface. The reason for this approach is simple: the parser cannot
tell the difference between a class template definition and the
definition of a member of a class template; both have template
parameter lists, and semantic analysis determines what that template
parameter list means.
There is still some cleanup to do with ActOnTag and
ActOnClassTemplate. This commit provides the basic functionality we
need, however.
llvm-svn: 76820
until Doug Gregor's Type smart pointer code lands (or more discussion occurs).
These methods just call the new Type::getAs<XXX> methods, so we still have
reduced implementation redundancy. Having explicit getAsXXXType() methods makes
it easier to set breakpoints in the debugger.
llvm-svn: 76193
template<typename T>
struct X {
struct Inner;
};
template struct X<int>::Inner;
This change is larger than it looks because it also fixes some
a problem with nested-name-specifiers and tags. We weren't requiring
the DeclContext associated with the scope specifier of a tag to be
complete. Therefore, when looking for something like "struct
X<int>::Inner", we weren't instantiating X<int>.
This, naturally, uncovered a problem with member pointers, where we
were requiring the left-hand side of a member pointer access
expression (e.g., x->*) to be a complete type. However, this is wrong:
the semantics of this expression does not require a complete type (EDG
agrees).
Stuart vouched for me. Blame him.
llvm-svn: 71756
specialization" within a C++ template, and permit name lookup into the
current instantiation. For example, given:
template<typename T, typename U>
struct X {
typedef T type;
X* x1; // current instantiation
X<T, U> *x2; // current instantiation
X<U, T> *x3; // not current instantiation
::X<type, U> *x4; // current instantiation
X<typename X<type, U>::type, U>: *x5; // current instantiation
};
llvm-svn: 71471
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
llvm-svn: 67875
uniqued representation that should both save some memory and make it
far easier to properly build canonical types for types involving
dependent nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "typename T::Nested::type".
This approach will greatly simplify the representation of
CXXScopeSpec. That'll be next.
llvm-svn: 67799
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 67308
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
Abramo Bagnara