Detected by Daniel Jasper, Ilia Filippov, and Andrea Di Biagio
Fixed the argument order to select (the mask semantics to blendv* are the
inverse of select) and fixed the tests
Added parenthesis to the assert condition
Ran clang-format
llvm-svn: 209667
That small change, although it looked harmless, it made emitting the LValue
on the PHI node without the proper cast. Reverting it fixes PR19841.
llvm-svn: 209663
In PPCISelLowering.cpp: PPCTargetLowering::LowerBUILD_VECTOR(), there
is an optimization for certain patterns to generate one or two vector
splats followed by a vector add or subtract. This operation is
represented by a VADD_SPLAT in the selection DAG. Prior to this
patch, it was possible for the VADD_SPLAT to be assigned the wrong
data type, causing incorrect code generation. This patch corrects the
problem.
Specifically, the code previously assigned the value type of the
BUILD_VECTOR node to the newly generated VADD_SPLAT node. This is
correct much of the time, but not always. The problem is that the
call to isConstantSplat() may return a SplatBitSize that is not the
same as the number of bits in the original element vector type. The
correct type to assign is a vector type with the same element bit size
as SplatBitSize.
The included test case shows an example of this, where the
BUILD_VECTOR node has a type of v16i8. The vector to be built is {0,
16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16}. isConstantSplat
detects that we can generate a splat of 16 for type v8i16, which is
the type we must assign to the VADD_SPLAT node. If we do not, we
generate a vspltisb of 8 and a vaddubm, which generates the incorrect
result {16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16,
16}. The correct code generation is a vspltish of 8 and a vadduhm.
This patch also corrected code generation for
CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-10-SplatMiscompile.ll, which had been marked
as an XFAIL, so we can remove the XFAIL from the test case.
llvm-svn: 209662
This way does not require a __sanitizer_cov_dump() call. That's
important on Android, where apps can be killed at arbitrary time.
We write raw PCs to disk instead of module offsets; we also write
memory layout to a separate file. This increases dump size by the
factor of 2 on 64-bit systems.
llvm-svn: 209653
A test in test/Generic creates a DAG where the NZCV output of an ADCS is used
by multiple nodes. This makes LLVM want to save a copy of NZCV for later, which
it couldn't do before.
This should be the last fix required for the aarch64 buildbot.
llvm-svn: 209651
Cortex-M4 only has single-precision floating point support, so any LLVM
"double" type will have been split into 2 i32s by now. Fortunately, the
consecutive-register framework turns out to be precisely what's needed to
reconstruct the double and follow AAPCS-VFP correctly!
rdar://problem/17012966
llvm-svn: 209650
These are tested by test/CodeGen/Generic, so we should probably know
how to deal with them. Fortunately generic code does it if asked.
llvm-svn: 209646
Summary:
Implemented an InstCombine transformation that takes a blendv* intrinsic
call and translates it into an IR select, if the mask is constant.
This will eventually get lowered into blends with immediates if possible,
or pblendvb (with an option to further optimize if we can transform the
pblendvb into a blend+immediate instruction, depending on the selector).
It will also enable optimizations by the IR passes, which give up on
sight of the intrinsic.
Both the transformation and the lowering of its result to asm got shiny
new tests.
The transformation is a bit convoluted because of blendvp[sd]'s
definition:
Its mask is a floating point value! This forces us to convert it and get
the highest bit. I suppose this happened because the mask has type
__m128 in Intel's intrinsic and v4sf (for blendps) in gcc's builtin.
I will send an email to llvm-dev to discuss if we want to change this or
not.
Reviewers: grosbach, delena, nadav
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3859
llvm-svn: 209643
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
llvm-svn: 209637
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 209636
We should later rename this file (probably MIUtilSystemPOSIX), but
more clean-up is still needed here, and we can wait until we better
understand how this code may be shared between FreeBSD, Linux, and OS X.
llvm-svn: 209631
Add tests for the following transform:
str X, [x0, #32]
...
add x0, x0, #32
->
str X, [x0, #32]!
with X being either w1, x1, s0, d0 or q0.
llvm-svn: 209627
We have a couple of regression tests for load/store pairing, but (to my knowledge) there are no regression tests for the load/store + add/sub folding.
As a first step towards increased test coverage of this area, this commit adds a test for one instance of a load + add to pre-indexed load transformation.
llvm-svn: 209618
Filipe Cabecinhas