Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillaume Chatelet 48904e9452 [Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,

This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433

llvm-svn: 371608
2019-09-11 11:16:48 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih c71cced0aa [CodeGen] Always use `printReg` to print registers in both MIR and debug
output

As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.

Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421

llvm-svn: 319445
2017-11-30 16:12:24 +00:00
Eli Friedman c22c699882 [ARM] Make ARMExpandPseudo add implicit uses for predicated instructions
Missing these could potentially screw up post-ra scheduling.

Issue found by inspection, so I don't have a real testcase. Included
test just verifies the expected operands after expansion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35156

llvm-svn: 312589
2017-09-05 22:54:06 +00:00