Summary:
Upstream LLVM is changing the the prototypes of the @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset
intrinsics. This change updates the Clang tests for this change.
The @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset intrinsics currently have an explicit argument
which is required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
dest (and source), and so must be the minimum of the actual alignment of the
two.
This change removes the alignment argument in favour of placing the alignment
attribute on the source and destination pointers of the memory intrinsic call.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 100, i32 4, i1 false)
will now read
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 4 %dest, i8* align 4 %src, i32 100, i1 false)
At this time the source and destination alignments must be the same (Step 1).
Step 2 of the change, to be landed shortly, will relax that contraint and allow
the source and destination to have different alignments.
llvm-svn: 322964
effect they would have in C++11. In particular, they do not prevent
value-initialization from performing zero-initialization, nor do they prevent a
struct from being an aggregate.
llvm-svn: 290229
This is a follow on from a similar LLVM commit: r253511.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
The only code change to clang is hidden in CGBuilder.h which now passes
both dest and source alignment to IRBuilder, instead of taking the minimum of
dest and source alignments.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253512
Also temporarily remove the assumption from IR gen that we can emit IR for every
constant we can fold, since it isn't currently true in C++11, to fix PR11676.
Original comment from r147271:
constexpr: perform zero-initialization prior to / instead of performing a
constructor call when appropriate. Thanks to Eli for spotting this.
llvm-svn: 147384
- Emit default-initialization of arrays that were partially initialized
with initializer lists with a loop, rather than emitting the default
initializer N times;
- support destroying VLAs of non-trivial type, although this is not
yet exposed to users; and
- support the partial destruction of arrays initialized with
initializer lists when an initializer throws an exception.
llvm-svn: 134784
-C++ objects with user-declared constructor don't need zero'ing.
-We can zero-initialize arrays of C++ objects in "bulk" now, in which case don't zero-initialize each object again.
llvm-svn: 130453
implicitly-defined default constructor, zero-initialize the memory
before calling the default constructor. Previously, we would only
zero-initialize in the case of a trivial default constructor.
Also, simplify the hideous logic that determines when we have a
trivial default constructor and, therefore, don't need to emit any
call at all.
llvm-svn: 111779
trivial default constructors. We're weren't zero-initializing them,
which manifested as <rdar://problem/8320532> (a regression in the GCC
test suite) and is likely to have caused significant other breakage.
llvm-svn: 111650
to avoid the awesome-but-wrong-in-this-case assertion in the canon EAC.
Fixes PR7834.
Also fix a subtle address-space bug in the memset path.
llvm-svn: 110511
keep track of whether we need to zero-initialize storage prior to
calling its constructor. Previously, we were only tracking this when
implicitly constructing the object (a CXXConstructExpr).
Fixes Boost's value-initialization tests, which means that the
Boost.Config library now passes all of its tests.
llvm-svn: 102461
Daniel Neilson