Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kristof Umann 058a7a450a [analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function
Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277
2019-01-26 14:23:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Kristof Umann 76a21502fd [analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275
2018-12-15 16:23:51 +00:00
Kristof Umann 9d6c4402c6 [analyzer] ConversionChecker: handle floating point
Extend the alpha.core.Conversion checker to handle implicit converions
where a too large integer value is converted to a floating point type. Each
floating point type has a range where it can exactly represent all integers; we
emit a warning when the integer value is above this range. Although it is
possible to exactly represent some integers which are outside of this range
(those that are divisible by a large enough power of 2); we still report cast
involving those, because their usage may lead to bugs. (For example, if 1<<24
is stored in a float variable x, then x==x+1 holds.)

Patch by: Donát Nagy!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52730

llvm-svn: 347006
2018-11-16 01:00:55 +00:00
Daniel Marjamaki d3d83681bc [Analyzer] Clarify error messages for undefined result
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30295

llvm-svn: 315462
2017-10-11 14:49:35 +00:00
Daniel Marjamaki 2641a52ee4 [analyzer] alpha.core.Conversion - Fix false positive for 'U32 += S16;' expression, that is not unsafe
Summary:
The alpha.core.Conversion was too strict about compound assignments and could warn even though there is no problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25596

llvm-svn: 299523
2017-04-05 08:57:04 +00:00
Artem Dergachev 002981baca [analyzer] Add a checker for loss of sign or precision in integral casts.
This new checker tries to find execution paths on which implicit integral casts
cause definite loss of information: a certainly-negative integer is converted
to an unsigned integer, or an integer is definitely truncated to fit into
a smaller type.

Being implicit, such casts are likely to produce unexpected results.

Patch by Daniel Marjamäki!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13126

llvm-svn: 278941
2016-08-17 16:02:45 +00:00