Summary:
This check will ensure that all calls to functions resolve to one inside the `__llvm_libc` namespace.
This is done to ensure that if we include a public header then we don't accidentally call into the a function within the global namespace.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, njames93
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, sivachandra
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #libc-project, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78890
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
Summary:
Before this PR, `modernize-use-using` would transform the typedef in
```
template <int A>
struct InjectedClassName {
typedef InjectedClassName b;
};
```
into `using b = InjectedClassName<A>;` and
```
template <int>
struct InjectedClassNameWithUnnamedArgument {
typedef InjectedClassNameWithUnnamedArgument b;
};
```
into `using b = InjectedClassNameWithUnnamedArgument<>;`.
The first fixit is surprising because its different than the code
before, but the second fixit doesn't even compile.
This PR adds an option to the TypePrinter to print InjectedClassNameType without
template parameters (i.e. as written).
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77979
Summary:
Before this PR, `modernize-use-using` would transform the typedef in
```
template <typename a> class TemplateKeyword {
typedef typename a::template f<> e;
typedef typename a::template f<>::d e2;
};
```
into
```
template <typename a> class TemplateKeyword {
using d = typename a::b<>;
using d2 = typename a::template a::b<>::c;
};
```
The first one is missing the `template` keyword,
the second one has an extra `a::` scope. Both result
in compilation errors.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78139
Summary:
Without this patch clang-tidy stops finding file configs on the nearest
.clang-tidy file. In some cases it is not very convenient because it
results in common parts duplication into every child .clang-tidy file.
This diff adds optional config inheritance from the parent directories
config files.
Test Plan:
Added test cases in existing config test.
Reviewers: alexfh, gribozavr2, klimek, hokein
Subscribers: njames93, arphaman, xazax.hun, aheejin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75184
Summary: This check is similar to an ARC Migration check that warned about this incorrect usage under ARC, but most projects are no longer undergoing migration from pre-ARC code. The documentation for NSInvocation is not explicit about these requirements and incorrect usage has been found in many of our projects.
Reviewers: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: stephanemoore, benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77571
Summary:
Previously, the check would fix
```
using fn = void(int);
void f(fn *);
void test() {
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:12: warning: parameter 'I' is unused
// CHECK-FIXES: {{^}} f([](int /*I*/) {
f([](int I) { return; });
}
```
into
`f([]() { return; });` which breaks compilation. Now the check is disabled from Lambdas.
The AST is not so easy to use. For
```
auto l = [](int) { return; };
f(l);
```
one gets
```
`-CallExpr <line:7:5, col:8> 'void'
|-ImplicitCastExpr <col:5> 'void (*)(fn *)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
| `-DeclRefExpr <col:5> 'void (fn *)' lvalue Function 0x55a91a545e28 'f' 'void (fn *)'
`-ImplicitCastExpr <col:7> 'void (*)(int)' <UserDefinedConversion>
`-CXXMemberCallExpr <col:7> 'void (*)(int)'
`-MemberExpr <col:7> '<bound member function type>' .operator void (*)(int) 0x55a91a546850
`-ImplicitCastExpr <col:7> 'const (lambda at line:6:14)' lvalue <NoOp>
`-DeclRefExpr <col:7> '(lambda at line:6:14)':'(lambda at line:6:14)' lvalue Var 0x55a91a5461c0 'l' '(lambda at line:6:14)':'(lambda at line:6:14)'
```
There is no direct use of the `operator()(int I)` of the lambda, so the `!Indexer->getOtherRefs(Function).empty()`
does not fire. In the future, we might be able to use the conversion operator `operator void (*)(int)` to mark
the call operator as having an "other ref".
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77680
Summary: Change all checks that take enums as configuration to use enum specific methods in `ClangTidyCheck::OptionsView`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76606
Summary:
It seems we need a different matcher for binary operator
in a template context.
Fixes this issue:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76990
Summary:
clang-apply-replacements currently deduplicates all diagnostic replacements. However if you get a duplicated replacement from one TU then its expected that it should not be deduplicated. This goes some way to solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45150 | export-fixes to yaml adds extra newlines and breaks offsets. ]]
Take this example yaml.
```
---
MainSourceFile: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
Diagnostics:
- DiagnosticName: readability-braces-around-statements
DiagnosticMessage:
Message: statement should be inside braces
FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
FileOffset: 14
Replacements:
- FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
Offset: 14
Length: 0
ReplacementText: ' {'
- FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
Offset: 28
Length: 0
ReplacementText: '
}'
- DiagnosticName: readability-braces-around-statements
DiagnosticMessage:
Message: statement should be inside braces
FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
FileOffset: 20
Replacements:
- FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
Offset: 20
Length: 0
ReplacementText: ' {'
- FilePath: '/home/nathan/test/test.cpp'
Offset: 28
Length: 0
ReplacementText: '
}'
...```
The current behaviour is to deduplicate the text insertions at Offset 28 and only apply one of the replacements.
However as both of these replacements came from the same translation unit we can be confident they were both meant to be applied together
The new behaviour won't deduplicate the text insertion and instead insert both of the replacements.
If the duplicate replacement is found inside different translation units (from a header file change perhaps) then they will still be deduplicated as before.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, klimek, ymandel
Reviewed By: ymandel
Subscribers: ymandel, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76054
Summary:
Made llvmlibc::RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck a subclass of protability::RestrictSystemIncludesCheck to re-use common code between the two.
This also adds the ability to white list linux development headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits, sivachandra
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76395
Summary:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27702
I wasn't sure how this type of thing is usually tested. So any advice would be appreciated.
`check-llvm`, `check-clang` and `check-clang-tools` are clean for me.
**C++98**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++98 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
3053 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 3052 warnings (3052 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
**C++17**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++17 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
5377 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&', 'Foo&&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 5376 warnings (5376 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
Reviewers: njames93, MaskRay, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75901
Summary:
Cover a new use case when using a 'signed char' as an integer
might lead to issue with non-ASCII characters. Comparing
a 'signed char' with an 'unsigned char' using equality / unequality
operator produces an unexpected result for non-ASCII characters.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75749
Summary: This adds a new module to enforce standards specific to the llvm-libc project. This change also adds the first check which restricts user from including system libc headers accidentally which can lead to subtle bugs that would be a challenge to detect.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: juliehockett, arphaman, jfb, abrachet, sivachandra, Eugene.Zelenko, njames93, mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #libc-project, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75332
Summary: Didn't realize that headers such as stddef.h may not exist on all systems. This patch mocks the headers so that the check's tests work on all systems. (:
Reviewers: RKSimon, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76015
Summary:
Created a general check for restrict-system-includes under portability as recommend in the comments under D75332. I also fleshed out the user facing documentation to show examples for common use-cases such as allow-list, block-list, and wild carding.
Removed fuchsia's check as per phosek sugguestion.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, phosek, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, phosek, cfe-commits, MaskRay
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75786
This change has two components. The moves the generated file
for a namespace to the directory named after the namespace in
a file named 'index.<format>'. This greatly improves the browsing
experience since the index page is shown by default for a directory.
The second improves the markdown output by adding the links to the
referenced pages for children objects and the link back to the source
code.
Patch By: Clayton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72954
This change has two components. The moves the generated file
for a namespace to the directory named after the namespace in
a file named 'index.<format>'. This greatly improves the browsing
experience since the index page is shown by default for a directory.
The second improves the markdown output by adding the links to the
referenced pages for children objects and the link back to the source
code.
Patch By: Clayton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72954
The change added a test that required exceptions, so enable that explicitly
so that it works on platforms that default to having exceptions disabled
(like the PS4).
readability-redundant-expression now detects expressions where a logical
or bitwise operator had equivalent LHS and RHS where the equivalent
operands were separated by more operands.
That's where nowadays those tests reside, those outliers were created
before the migration but committed after,
so they just awkwardly reside in the old place.
Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually run out of stack and crash.
You can of course track the recursion depth
but if it is hardcoded, there can always be some
other environment when that depth is too large,
so said magic number would need to be env-dependent.
But then your program's behavior is suddenly more env-dependent.
Also, recursion, while it does not outright stop optimization,
recursive calls are less great than normal calls,
for example they hinder inlining.
Recursion is banned in some coding guidelines:
* SEI CERT DCL56-CPP. Avoid cycles during initialization of static objects
* JPL 2.4 Do not use direct or indirect recursion.
* I'd say it is frowned upon in LLVM, although not banned
And is plain unsupported in some cases:
* OpenCL 1.2, 6.9 Restrictions: i. Recursion is not supported.
So there's clearly a lot of reasons why one might want to
avoid recursion, and replace it with worklist handling.
It would be great to have a enforcement for it though.
This implements such a check.
Here we detect both direct and indirect recursive calls,
although since clang-tidy (unlike clang static analyzer)
is CTU-unaware, if the recursion transcends a single standalone TU,
we will naturally not find it :/
The algorithm is pretty straight-forward:
1. Build call-graph for the entire TU.
For that, the existing `clang::CallGraph` is re-used,
although it had to be modified to also track the location of the call.
2. Then, the hard problem: how do we detect recursion?
Since we have a graph, let's just do the sane thing,
and look for Strongly Connected Function Declarations - widely known as `SCC`.
For that LLVM provides `llvm::scc_iterator`,
which is internally an Tarjan's DFS algorithm, and is used throught LLVM,
so this should be as performant as possible.
3. Now that we've got SCC's, we discard those that don't contain loops.
Note that there may be more than one loop in SCC!
4. For each loopy SCC, we call out each function, and print a single example
call graph that shows recursion -- it didn't seem worthwhile enumerating
every possible loop in SCC, although i suppose it could be implemented.
* To come up with that call graph cycle example, we start at first SCC node,
see which callee of the node is within SCC (and is thus known to be in cycle),
and recurse into it until we hit the callee that is already in call stack.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, ffrankies, Eugene.Zelenko, erichkeane, NoQ
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Charusso, Naghasan, bader, riccibruno, mgorny, Anastasia, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362
When running on Windows under the following locale:
D:\llvm-project>python
Python 3.8.0 (tags/v3.8.0:fa919fd, Oct 14 2019, 19:37:50) [MSC v.1916 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import locale
>>> locale.getlocale()
('French_Canada', '1252')
This patch fixes the following issue:
# command stderr:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/test/../test\clang-tidy\check_clang_tidy.py", line 249, in <module>
main()
File "D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/test/../test\clang-tidy\check_clang_tidy.py", line 245, in main
run_test_once(args, extra_args)
File "D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/test/../test\clang-tidy\check_clang_tidy.py", line 162, in run_test_once
diff_output.decode() +
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe0 in position 2050: invalid continuation byte
This is caused by diff reporting no EOL on the last line, and unfortunately this is written in French with accentuation on my locale.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74498
Saleem Abdulrasool