The versions that take 'unsigned' will be removed in the future.
I tried to use getOriginalAlign instead of getAlign in some
places. getAlign factors in the minimum alignment implied by
the offset in the pointer info. Since we're also passing the
pointer info we can use the original alignment.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87592
This adds SoftenFloatRes, PromoteFloatRes and SoftPromoteHalfRes
legalizations for VECREDUCE, to fill the remaining hole in the SDAG
legalization. These legalizations simply expand the reduction and
let it be recursively legalized. For the PromoteFloatRes case at
least it is possible to do better than that, but it's pretty tricky
(because we need to consider the interaction of three different
vector legalizations and the type promotion) and probably not
really worthwhile.
I haven't added ExpandFloatRes support, as I am not familiar with
ppc_fp128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87569
LLVM will canonicalize conditional selectors to a different pattern than the old code that was used.
This is updating the function to match the new expected patterns and select SSAT or USAT when successful.
Tests have also been updated to use the new patterns.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87379
This adds additional checks for the original scalar loop tripcount value, i.e.
get.active.lane.mask second argument, and perform several sanity checks to see
if it is of the form that we expect similarly like we already do for the IV
which is the first argument of get.active.lane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86074
Treating an SoImm offset as a multiple of 4 between -1020 and 1020
mis-handles the second of a pair of 16-bit constants where the offset is a multiple of 2 but not a multiple of 4,
leading to an LLVM ERROR: out of range pc-relative fixup value
For 32-bit and larger (64-bit) constants, continue to treat an SoImm offset as a multiple of 4 between -1020 and 1020.
For smaller (16-bit) constants, treat an SoImm offset as a multiple of 1 between -255 and 255.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86949
This allows the backend to tell the vectorizer to produce inloop
reductions through a TTI hook.
For the moment on ARM under MVE this means allowing integer add
reductions of the correct size. In the future this can include integer
min/max too, under -Os.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75512
This fixes a complication on top of D87276. If we are sign extending
around a mul with the two operands that are the same, instcombine will
helpfully convert one of the sext to a zext. Reverse that so that we
again generate a reduction.
Differnetial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87287
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html
This is hopefully the final remaining showstopper before we can remove
the 'experimental' from the reduction intrinsics.
No behavior was specified for the FP min/max reductions, so we have a
mess of different interpretations.
There are a few potential options for the semantics of these max/min ops.
I think this is the simplest based on current behavior/implementation:
make the reductions inherit from the existing llvm.maxnum/minnum intrinsics.
These correspond to libm fmax/fmin, and those are similar to the (now
deprecated?) IEEE-754 maxNum/minNum functions (NaNs are treated as missing
data). So the default expansion creates calls to libm functions.
Another option would be to inherit from llvm.maximum/minimum (NaNs propagate),
but most targets just crash in codegen when given those nodes because no
default expansion was ever implemented AFAICT.
We could also just assume 'nnan' semantics by default (we are already
assuming 'nsz' semantics in the maxnum/minnum intrinsics), but some targets
(AArch64, PowerPC) support the more defined behavior, so it doesn't make much
sense to not allow a tighter spec. Fast-math-flags (nnan) can be used to
loosen the semantics.
(Note that D67507 was proposed to update the LangRef to acknowledge the more
recent IEEE-754 2019 standard, but that patch seems to have stalled. If we do
update based on the new standard, the reduction instructions can seamlessly
inherit from whatever updates are made to the max/min intrinsics.)
x86 sees a regression here on 'nnan' tests because we have underlying,
longstanding bugs in FMF creation/propagation. Those need to be fixed apart
from this change (for example: https://llvm.org/PR35538). The expansion
sequence before this patch may not have been correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87391
We can sometimes get code that does:
xe = zext i16 x to i32
ye = zext i16 y to i32
m = mul i32 xe, ye
me = zext i32 m to i64
r = vecreduce.add(me)
This "double extend" can trip up the reduction identification, but
should give identical results.
This extends the pattern matching to handle them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87276
values
The effects of unpredicated vector instruction with unknown
lanes cannot be predicted and therefore cannot be tail predicated. This
does not apply to predicated vector instructions and so this patch
allows tail predication on them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87376
We weren't using this before, so none of the MachineFunction CFG edges had the
branch probability information added. As a result, block placement later in the
pipeline was flying blind.
This is enabled only with optimizations enabled like SelectionDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86824
We really want to try and avoid spilling P0, which can be difficult
since there's only one register, so try to rematerialize any VCTP
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87280
count register
After my patch at D86087, code that now uses the mov operand rather than
the vctp operand will no longer remove modifications to the vctp operand
as they should. This patch fixes that by explicitly removing
modifications to the vctp operand rather than the register used as the
element count.
This was reverted in 503deec218
because it caused gigantic increase (3x) in branch mispredictions
in certain benchmarks on certain CPU's,
see https://reviews.llvm.org/D84108#2227365.
It has since been investigated and here are the results:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20200907/827578.html
> It's an amazingly severe regression, but it's also all due to branch
> mispredicts (about 3x without this). The code layout looks ok so there's
> probably something else to deal with. I'm not sure there's anything we can
> reasonably do so we'll just have to take the hit for now and wait for
> another code reorganization to make the branch predictor a bit more happy :)
>
> Thanks for giving us some time to investigate and feel free to recommit
> whenever you'd like.
>
> -eric
So let's just reland this.
Original commit message:
I've been looking at missed vectorizations in one codebase.
One particular thing that stands out is that some of the loops
reach vectorizer in a rather mangled form, with weird PHI's,
and some of the loops aren't even in a rotated form.
After taking a more detailed look, that happened because
the loop's headers were too big by then. It is evident that
SimplifyCFG's common code hoisting transform is at fault there,
because the pattern it handles is precisely the unrotated
loop basic block structure.
Surprizingly, `SimplifyCFGOpt::HoistThenElseCodeToIf()` is enabled
by default, and is always run, unlike it's friend, common code sinking
transform, `SinkCommonCodeFromPredecessors()`, which is not enabled
by default and is only run once very late in the pipeline.
I'm proposing to harmonize this, and disable common code hoisting
until //late// in pipeline. Definition of //late// may vary,
here currently i've picked the same one as for code sinking,
but i suppose we could enable it as soon as right after
loop rotation happens.
Experimentation shows that this does indeed unsurprizingly help,
more loops got rotated, although other issues remain elsewhere.
Now, this undoubtedly seriously shakes phase ordering.
This will undoubtedly be a mixed bag in terms of both compile- and
run- time performance, codesize. Since we no longer aggressively
hoist+deduplicate common code, we don't pay the price of said hoisting
(which wasn't big). That may allow more loops to be rotated,
so we pay that price. That, in turn, that may enable all the transforms
that require canonical (rotated) loop form, including but not limited to
vectorization, so we pay that too. And in general, no deduplication means
more [duplicate] instructions going through the optimizations. But there's still
late hoisting, some of them will be caught late.
As per benchmarks i've run {F12360204}, this is mostly within the noise,
there are some small improvements, some small regressions.
One big regression i saw i fixed in rG8d487668d09fb0e4e54f36207f07c1480ffabbfd, but i'm sure
this will expose many more pre-existing missed optimizations, as usual :S
llvm-compile-time-tracker.com thoughts on this:
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=e40315d2b4ed1e38962a8f33ff151693ed4ada63&to=c8289c0ecbf235da9fb0e3bc052e3c0d6bff5cf9&stat=instructions
* this does regress compile-time by +0.5% geomean (unsurprizingly)
* size impact varies; for ThinLTO it's actually an improvement
The largest fallout appears to be in GVN's load partial redundancy
elimination, it spends *much* more time in
`MemoryDependenceResults::getNonLocalPointerDependency()`.
Non-local `MemoryDependenceResults` is widely-known to be, uh, costly.
There does not appear to be a proper solution to this issue,
other than silencing the compile-time performance regression
by tuning cut-off thresholds in `MemoryDependenceResults`,
at the cost of potentially regressing run-time performance.
D84609 attempts to move in that direction, but the path is unclear
and is going to take some time.
If we look at stats before/after diffs, some excerpts:
* RawSpeed (the target) {F12360200}
* -14 (-73.68%) loops not rotated due to the header size (yay)
* -272 (-0.67%) `"Number of live out of a loop variables"` - good for vectorizer
* -3937 (-64.19%) common instructions hoisted
* +561 (+0.06%) x86 asm instructions
* -2 basic blocks
* +2418 (+0.11%) IR instructions
* vanilla test-suite + RawSpeed + darktable {F12360201}
* -36396 (-65.29%) common instructions hoisted
* +1676 (+0.02%) x86 asm instructions
* +662 (+0.06%) basic blocks
* +4395 (+0.04%) IR instructions
It is likely to be sub-optimal for when optimizing for code size,
so one might want to change tune pipeline by enabling sinking/hoisting
when optimizing for size.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84108
This reverts commit 503deec218.
When optimising for size, make the cost of i1 logical operations
relatively expensive so that optimisations don't try to combine
predicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86525
This adds a simple tablegen pattern for folding predicate_cast(load)
into vldr p0, providing the alignment and offset are correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86702
This patch implements the foldMemoryOperand hook in Thumb1InstrInfo,
allowing tBLXr and a spilled function address to be combined back into a
tBL. This can help with codesize at Oz, especailly in the tinycrypt
library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79785
There's a special case in hasAttribute for None when pImpl is null. If pImpl is not null we dispatch to pImpl->hasAttribute which will always return false for Attribute::None.
So if we just want to check for None its sufficient to just check that pImpl is null. Which can even be done inline.
This patch adds a helper for that case which I hope will speed up our getSubtargetImpl implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86744
Skip this for now, to avoid a backend crash in:
UNREACHABLE executed at llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp:13412
This should fix PR45824.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86784
These arm_mve_vldr_gather_offset_predicated and
arm_mve_vstr_scatter_offset_predicated have some extra parameters
meaning the predicate is at a later operand. If a loop contains _only_
those masked instructions, we would miss transforming the active lane
mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86791
Remove the code that tried to look for reduction patterns, since the
vectorizer and isel can now produce predicated arithmetic instructios
within the loop body. This has required some reorganisation and fixes
around live-out and predication checks, as well as looking for cases
where an input/output is initialised to zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86613
This patch adjusts the following ARM/AArch64 LLVM IR intrinsics:
- neon_bfmmla
- neon_bfmlalb
- neon_bfmlalt
so that they take and return bf16 and float types. Previously these
intrinsics used <8 x i8> and <4 x i8> vectors (a rudiment from
implementation lacking bf16 IR type).
The neon_vbfdot[q] intrinsics are adjusted similarly. This change
required some additional selection patterns for vbfdot itself and
also for vector shuffles (in a previous patch) because of SelectionDAG
transformations kicking in and mangling the original code.
This patch makes the generated IR cleaner (less useless bitcasts are
produced), but it does not affect the final assembly.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86146
Enable default outlining when the function has the minsize attribute
and we're targeting an m-class core.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82951
Fix the ARM backend's analyzeBranch so it doesn't ignore predicated
return instructions, and make the MachineVerifier rule more strict.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40061
MVE Gather scatter codegeneration is looking a lot better than it used
to, but still has some issues. The instructions we currently model as 1
cycle per element, which is a bit low for some cases. Increasing the
cost by the MVECostFactor brings them in-line with our other instruction
costs. This will have the effect of only generating then when the extra
benefit is more likely to overcome some of the issues. Notably in
running out of registers and vectorizing loops that could otherwise be
SLP vectorized.
In the short-term whilst we look at other ways of dealing with those
more directly, we can increase the costs of gathers to make them more
likely to be beneficial when created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86444
This adapts tail-predication to the new semantics of get.active.lane.mask as
defined in D86147. This means that:
- we can remove the BTC + 1 overflow checks because now the loop tripcount is
passed in to the intrinsic,
- we can immediately use that value to setup a counter for the number of
elements processed by the loop and don't need to materialize BTC + 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86303
If gather/scatters are enabled, ARMTargetTransformInfo now allows
tail predication for loops with a much wider range of strides, up
to anything that is loop invariant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85410
As disscussed in post-commit review starting with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84108#2227365
while this appears to be mostly a win overall, especially code-size-wise,
this appears to shake //certain// code pattens in a way that is extremely
unfavorable for performance (+30% runtime regression)
on certain CPU's (i personally can't reproduce).
So until the behaviour is better understood, and a path forward is mapped,
let's back this out for now.
This reverts commit 1d51dc38d8.
Modify the ARM getCmpSelInstrCost implementation for the code size
costs of selects. Now consider the legalization cost and increase
the cost of i1 because those values wouldn't live in a general purpose
register. We also make selects +1 more expensive to account for the IT
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82091
As part of D84741, this adds a target hook for the
preferPredicatedReductionSelect option and makes use
of it under MVE, allowing us to tail predicate most
reduction loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85980
Use the stack to save and restore the link register when there is no
available register to do it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76069
VLD2/4 instructions cannot be predicated, so we cannot tail predicate
them from autovec. From intrinsics though, they should be valid as they
will just end up loading extra values into off vector lanes, not
effecting the on lanes. The same is true for loads in general where so
long as we are not using the other vector lanes, an unpredicated load
can be converted to a predicated one.
This marks VLD2 and VLD4 instructions as validForTailPredication and
allows any unpredicated load in tail predication loop, which seems to be
valid given the other checks we have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86022
There are some cases where the instruction that sets up the iteration
count for a tail predicated loop cannot be moved before the dlstp,
stopping tail predication entirely. This patch checks if the mov operand
can be used and if so, uses that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86087
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
These operations take Qda and Rn register operands, which are
commutative so long as the instruction is not predicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85813
Similar to the Two op + select patterns that were added recently, this
adds some patterns for select + fma to turn them into predicated
operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85824
Sam Tebbs