Summary:
The check warns if an object is used after it has been moved, without an
intervening reinitialization.
See user-facing documentation for details.
Reviewers: sbenza, Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, shadeware, omtcyfz, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, fowles, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23353
llvm-svn: 281453
This patch extends readability-container-size-empty check allowing it to produce
warnings not only for STL containers, but also for containers, which provide two
functions matching following signatures:
* `size_type size() const;`
* `bool empty() const;`
Where `size_type` can be any kind of integer type.
This functionality was proposed in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26823
by Eugene Zelenko.
Approval: alexfh
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Eugene.Zelenko
Subscribers: etienneb, Prazek, hokein, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24349
llvm-svn: 281307
Summary:
The check emits a warning if std::move() is applied to a forwarding reference, i.e. an rvalue reference of a function template argument type.
If a developer is unaware of the special rules for template argument deduction on forwarding references, it will seem reasonable to apply std::move() to the forwarding reference, in the same way that this would be done for a "normal" rvalue reference.
This has a consequence that is usually unwanted and possibly surprising: If the function that takes the forwarding reference as its parameter is called with an lvalue, that lvalue will be moved from (and hence placed into an indeterminate state) even though no std::move() was applied to the lvalue at the callsite.
As a fix, the check will suggest replacing the std::move() with a std::forward().
This patch requires D23004 to be submitted before it.
Reviewers: sbenza, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, etienneb, alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, Eugene.Zelenko, mgehre, cfe-commits
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22220
llvm-svn: 280077
Changed the extension check to include the option of ",h,hh,hpp,hxx" instead of just returning whether the file ended with ".h".
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20512
llvm-svn: 279803
The check will warn when the constness will make the function interface safer.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15332
llvm-svn: 279507
Use table to avoid tautology. List all existing checks groups. Use alphabetical order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23471
llvm-svn: 278686
...
This check verifies if a buffer passed to an MPI (Message Passing Interface)
function is sufficiently dereferenced. Buffers should be passed as a single
pointer or array. As MPI function signatures specify void * for their buffer
types, insufficiently dereferenced buffers can be passed, like for example
as double pointers or multidimensional arrays, without a compiler warning
emitted.
Instructions on how to apply the check can be found at:
https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker/tree/master/examples
Reviewers: Haojian Wu
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22729
llvm-svn: 278553
`readability-else-after-return` only warns about `return` calls, but LLVM Coding
Standars stat that `throw`, `continue`, `goto`, etc after `return` calls are
bad, too.
Reviwers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23265
llvm-svn: 278257
This patch introduces a minor list of changes as proposed by Richard Smith in
the mailing list.
See original comments with an impact on the future check state below:
[comments.begin
> + {"complex.h", "ccomplex"},
It'd be better to convert this one to <complex>, or leave it alone.
<ccomplex> is an unnecessary wart.
(The contents of C++11's <complex.h> / <ccomplex> / <complex> (all of
which are identical) aren't comparable to C99's <complex.h>, so if
this was C++98 code using the C99 header, the code will be broken with
or without this transformation.)
> + {"iso646.h", "ciso646"},
Just delete #includes of this one. <ciso646> does nothing.
> + {"stdalign.h", "cstdalign"},
> + {"stdbool.h", "cstdbool"},
We should just delete these two includes. These headers do nothing in C++.
comments.end]
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17990
llvm-svn: 278254
Summary:
The misc-argument-comment check now ignores leading and trailing underscores and
case. The new `StrictMode` local/global option can be used to switch back to
strict checking.
Add getLocalOrGlobal version for integral types, minor cleanups.
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23135
llvm-svn: 277729
alexfh raised a concern with https://reviews.llvm.org/rL277340
After retabbing indentation of .. code-block:: was increased to 8, 4 spaces
indentation should be enough.
Reviewers: alexfh
llvm-svn: 277577
This check verifies if buffer type and MPI (Message Passing Interface)
datatype pairs match. All MPI datatypes defined by the MPI standard (3.1)
are verified by this check. User defined typedefs, custom MPI datatypes and
null pointer constants are skipped, in the course of verification.
Instructions on how to apply the check can be found at:
https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker/tree/master/examples
Patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21962
llvm-svn: 277516
Summary:
This check verifies if buffer type and MPI (Message Passing Interface)
datatype pairs match. All MPI datatypes defined by the MPI standard (3.1)
are verified by this check. User defined typedefs, custom MPI datatypes and
null pointer constants are skipped, in the course of verification.
Instructions on how to apply the check can be found at: https://github.com/0ax1/MPI-Checker/tree/master/examples
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Alexander Droste!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21962
llvm-svn: 276640
Summary:
Make check more useful in the following two cases:
The parameter is passed by non-const value, has a non-deleted move constructor and is only referenced once in the function as argument to the type's copy constructor.
The parameter is passed by non-const value, has a non-deleted move assignment operator and is only referenced once in the function as argument of the the type's copy assignment operator.
In this case suggest a fix to move the parameter which avoids the unnecessary copy and is closest to what the user might have intended.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza
Subscribers: cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20277
llvm-svn: 274380
Summary:
Conceptually, this is very close to the existing functionality of misc-move-const-arg, which is why I'm adding it here and not creating a new check. For example, for a type A that is both movable and copyable, this
const A a1;
A a2(std::move(a1));
is not only a case where a const argument is being passed to std::move(), but the result of std::move() is also being passed as a const reference (due to overload resolution).
The new check typically triggers (exclusively) in cases where people think they're dealing with a movable type, but in fact the type is not movable.
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Patch by Martin Boehme!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21223
llvm-svn: 272896
Martin Bohme