This check did not create FixItHints when the statement before the redundant
control flow was not followed by a semicolon.
Patch by Malcolm Parsons!
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24500
llvm-svn: 281713
Having both rename-at and rename-all both seems confusing and introduces
unneeded difficulties. After merging rename-at and rename-all maintaining main
function wrappers and custom help becomes redundant while CLI becomes less
confusing.
D24224 (which was the original patch causing buildbot failures) wasn't aware of
bugs caused by passing both -offset and -qualified-name. After D24224 was landed
it caused buildbot failures and therefor I just reverted it.
Two things that make this patch different from D24224 are:
* unittests/clang-rename was deleted, because it is unmaintained and doesn't do
much.
* Passing both `-offset` and `-qualified-name` isn't allowed anymore for the
sake of preventing bugs.
This patch is a trivial enhancement of accepted D24224 revision.
Tested with `ninja check-all`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24567
llvm-svn: 281710
Summary:
This is needed for the recently submitted misc-use-after-move check (rL281453).
For some reason, this still built under Linux, but it caused the PPC build bot
to fail.
Subscribers: beanz, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24561
llvm-svn: 281460
Having both rename-at and rename-all both seems confusing and introduces
unneeded difficulties. Allowing to use both -qualified-name and -offset at once
while performing efficient renamings seems like a feature, too. Maintaining main
function wrappers and custom help becomes redundant while CLI becomes less
confusing.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24224
llvm-svn: 281456
Summary:
The check warns if an object is used after it has been moved, without an
intervening reinitialization.
See user-facing documentation for details.
Reviewers: sbenza, Prazek, alexfh
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, shadeware, omtcyfz, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, fowles, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23353
llvm-svn: 281453
This patch extends readability-container-size-empty check allowing it to produce
warnings not only for STL containers, but also for containers, which provide two
functions matching following signatures:
* `size_type size() const;`
* `bool empty() const;`
Where `size_type` can be any kind of integer type.
This functionality was proposed in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26823
by Eugene Zelenko.
Approval: alexfh
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, Eugene.Zelenko
Subscribers: etienneb, Prazek, hokein, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24349
llvm-svn: 281307
This reverts commit r280839.
It's problematic on OS X, where the '/Users/...' paths are interpreted
as '/U' options.
Investigation ongoing in http://llvm.org/PR30328.
llvm-svn: 280975
For now this only adds the UI necessary to configure clang-tidy
settings graphically, and it enables reading in and saving out
of .clang-tidy files. It does not actually run clang-tidy on
any source files yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23848
llvm-svn: 280840
This was originally reverted because the patch on the clang
tooling side was reverted. That patch is being resubmitted,
so this patch is resubmitted as well.
llvm-svn: 280839
Although it is not explicitly stated in LLVM Coding Standards, LLVM developers
prefer to omit braces around flow control statements with single line body.
For example the following piece of code
```
if (condition)
std::cout << "Hello, world!" << std::endl;
```
is preferred to
```
if (condition) {
std::cout << "Hello, world!" << std::endl;
}
```
So far clang-rename has ignored this. This patch makes clang-rename more
"LLVM-ish".
llvm-svn: 280640
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excessive padding).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279
llvm-svn: 280456
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excess padding).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279
llvm-svn: 280431
Summary:
Bugfix for 27321. When the constructor of stored pointer
type is private then it is invalid to change it to
make_shared or make_unique.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23343
llvm-svn: 280180
Summary:
The check emits a warning if std::move() is applied to a forwarding reference, i.e. an rvalue reference of a function template argument type.
If a developer is unaware of the special rules for template argument deduction on forwarding references, it will seem reasonable to apply std::move() to the forwarding reference, in the same way that this would be done for a "normal" rvalue reference.
This has a consequence that is usually unwanted and possibly surprising: If the function that takes the forwarding reference as its parameter is called with an lvalue, that lvalue will be moved from (and hence placed into an indeterminate state) even though no std::move() was applied to the lvalue at the callsite.
As a fix, the check will suggest replacing the std::move() with a std::forward().
This patch requires D23004 to be submitted before it.
Reviewers: sbenza, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, etienneb, alexfh, aaron.ballman, Prazek, Eugene.Zelenko, mgehre, cfe-commits
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22220
llvm-svn: 280077
Old output was:
clang-rename: could not find symbol at tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-rename/ClassFindByName.cpp:1:1 (offset 0).
Reviewers: omtcyfz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24002
llvm-svn: 280062
Changed the extension check to include the option of ",h,hh,hpp,hxx" instead of just returning whether the file ended with ".h".
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20512
llvm-svn: 279803
The check will warn when the constness will make the function interface safer.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15332
llvm-svn: 279507
Kirill Bobyrev