Clang would reject
#pragma omp for
#pragma omp tile sizes(P)
for (int i = 0; i < 128; ++i) {}
where P is a template parameter, but the loop itself is not
template-dependent. Because P context-dependent, the TransformedStmt
cannot be generated and therefore is nullptr (until the template is
instantiated by TreeTransform). The OMPForDirective would still expect
the a loop is the dependent context and trigger an error.
Fix by introducing a NumGeneratedLoops field to OMPLoopTransformation.
This is used to distinguish the case where no TransformedStmt will be
generated at all (e.g. #pragma omp unroll full) and template
instantiation is needed. In the latter case, delay resolving the
iteration space like when the for-loop itself is template-dependent
until the template instatiation.
A more radical solution would always delay the iteration space analysis
until template instantiation, but would also break many test cases.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111124
The tile directive is in OpenMP's Technical Report 8 and foreseeably will be part of the upcoming OpenMP 5.1 standard.
This implementation is based on an AST transformation providing a de-sugared loop nest. This makes it simple to forward the de-sugared transformation to loop associated directives taking the tiled loops. In contrast to other loop associated directives, the OMPTileDirective does not use CapturedStmts. Letting loop associated directives consume loops from different capture context would be difficult.
A significant amount of code generation logic is taking place in the Sema class. Eventually, I would prefer if these would move into the CodeGen component such that we could make use of the OpenMPIRBuilder, together with flang. Only expressions converting between the language's iteration variable and the logical iteration space need to take place in the semantic analyzer: Getting the of iterations (e.g. the overload resolution of `std::distance`) and converting the logical iteration number to the iteration variable (e.g. overload resolution of `iteration + .omp.iv`). In clang, only CXXForRangeStmt is also represented by its de-sugared components. However, OpenMP loop are not defined as syntatic sugar. Starting with an AST-based approach allows us to gradually move generated AST statements into CodeGen, instead all at once.
I would also like to refactor `checkOpenMPLoop` into its functionalities in a follow-up. In this patch it is used twice. Once for checking proper nesting and emitting diagnostics, and additionally for deriving the logical iteration space per-loop (instead of for the loop nest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76342
Michael Kruse