with the one change that ThreadPlanStepOut::ThreadPlanStepOut
will now only advance the return address breakpoint to
the end of a source line, if we have source line debug information.
It will not advance to the end of a Symbol if we lack source line
information. This, or the recognition of the LEAVE instruction
in r257209, would have fixed the regression that Siva was seeing.
Both were good changes, so I've made both.
Original commit message:
Performance improvement: Change lldb so that it puts a breakpoint
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.
I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>
llvm-svn: 257210
puts a breakpoint" it is causing a regression in the TestStepNoDebug
test case on ubuntu 14.04 with gcc 4.9.2. Thanks for the email
Siva. I'll recommit when I've figured out the regression.
llvm-svn: 257138
on the first branch instruction after a function return (or the end
of a source line), instead of a breakpoint on the return address,
to skip an extra stop & start of the inferior process.
I changed Process::AdvanceAddressToNextBranchInstruction to not
take an optional InstructionList argument - no callers are providing
a cached InstructionList today, and if this function was going to
do that, the right thing to do would be to fill out / use a
DisassemblerSP which is a disassembler with the InstructionList for
this address range.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15708
<rdar://problem/23309838>
llvm-svn: 257117
the same parent frame, but different current frame - e.g. when
you step past a tail call exit from a function. Apply the same
"avoid-no-debug" rules to this case as for a "step-in".
<rdar://problem/16189225>
llvm-svn: 214946
for customizing "step-in" behavior (e.g. step-in doesn't step into code with no debug info), but also
the behavior of step-in/step-out and step-over when they step out of the frame they started in.
I also added as a proof of concept of this reworking a mode for stepping where stepping out of a frame
into a frame with no debug information will continue stepping out till it arrives at a frame that does
have debug information. This is useful when you are debugging callback based code where the callbacks
are separated from the code that initiated them by some library glue you don't care about, among other
things.
llvm-svn: 203747
plan providers from a "ThreadPlan *" to a "lldb::ThreadPlanSP". That was needed to fix
a bug where the ThreadPlanStepInRange wasn't checking with its sub-plans to make sure they
succeed before trying to proceed further. If the sub-plan failed and as a result didn't make
any progress, you could end up retrying the same failing algorithm in an infinite loop.
<rdar://problem/14043602>
llvm-svn: 186618
LLDB is crashing when logging is enabled from lldb-perf-clang. This has to do with the global destructor chain as the process and its threads are being torn down.
All logging channels now make one and only one instance that is kept in a global pointer which is never freed. This guarantees that logging can correctly continue as the process tears itself down.
llvm-svn: 178191
the function it is being asked to step through, so that even if we get the trampoline
target wrong (for instance) we will still not lose control.
The other fix here is to tighten up the handling of the case where the current plan
doesn't explain the stop, but a plan above us does. In that case, if the plan that
does explain the stop says it is done, we need to clean up the plans below it and
continue on with our processing.
llvm-svn: 145740
Jason Molenda