difference is that we no longer clean the token before emitting it. This fixes a bug where
clang hangs in the middle of crashing because the crash handler calls malloc from inside
a crash that happened inside of free.
llvm-svn: 177919
This addresses an undefined value false positive from concreteOffsetBindingIsInvalidatedBySymbolicOffsetAssignment.
Fixes PR14877; radar://12991168.
llvm-svn: 177905
These aren't generated by default, but they are needed when either side of
the comparison is tainted.
Should fix our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 177846
Changing -ccc-install-dir to affect cc1's resource-dir setting broke our
internal LNT tests. After discussing the situation with Jim, we've decided to
pursue an alternate approach. We really want the resource-dir to be located
relative to clang, even when using -ccc-install-dir, but we're going to
add a fallback setting for the libc++ headers if they don't exist alongside
the compiler.
llvm-svn: 177815
to an out-parameter using the indirect-writeback conversion,
and we copied the current value of the variable to the temporary,
make sure that we register an intrinsic use of that value with
the optimizer so that the value won't get released until we have
a chance to retain it.
rdar://13195034
llvm-svn: 177813
In C, comparisons between signed and unsigned numbers are always done in
unsigned-space. Thus, we should know that "i >= 0U" is always true, even
if 'i' is signed. Similarly, "u >= 0" is also always true, even though '0'
is signed.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003> (false positives related to std::vector)
llvm-svn: 177806
For two concrete locations, we were producing another concrete location and
then casting it to an integer. We should just create a nonloc::ConcreteInt
to begin with.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177805
This allows us to compare two direct invocations of the analyzer on a
single source file without having to wrap the output plists in their
own directories.
llvm-svn: 177804
We can support the full range of comparison operations between two locations
by canonicalizing them as subtraction, as in the previous commit.
This won't work (well) if either location includes an offset, or (again)
if the comparisons are not consistent about which region comes first.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177803
Canonicalizing these two forms allows us to better model containers like
std::vector, which use "m_start != m_finish" to implement empty() but
"m_finish - m_start" to implement size(). The analyzer should have a
consistent interpretation of these two symbolic expressions, even though
it's not properly reasoning about either one yet.
The other unfortunate thing is that while the size() expression will only
ever be written "m_finish - m_start", the comparison may be written
"m_finish == m_start" or "m_start == m_finish". Right now the analyzer does
not attempt to canonicalize those two expressions, since it doesn't know
which length expression to pick. Doing this correctly will probably require
implementing unary minus as a new SymExpr kind (<rdar://problem/12351075>).
For now, the analyzer inverts the order of arguments in the comparison to
build the subtraction, on the assumption that "begin() != end()" is
written more often than "end() != begin()". This is purely speculation.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177801
We just treat this as opaque symbols, but even that allows us to handle
simple cases where the same condition is tested twice. This is very common
in the STL, which means that any project using the STL gets spurious errors.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003>.
llvm-svn: 177800
Alexey Samsonov