As per the discussion on D58375, we disable test that have optimizations under
the new PM. This patch adds -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager to RUNS that:
- Already run with optimizations (-O1 or higher) that were missed in D58375.
- Explicitly test new PM behavior along side some new PM RUNS, but are missing
this flag if new PM is enabled by default.
- Specify -O without the number. Based on getOptimizationLevel(), it seems the
default is 2, and the IR appears to be the same when changed to -O2, so
update the test to explicitly say -O2 and provide -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63156
llvm-svn: 364066
Summary:
This is the first in a series of changes trying to align clang -cc1
flags for Split DWARF with those of llc. The unfortunate side effect of
having -split-dwarf-output for single file Split DWARF will disappear
again in a subsequent change.
The change is the result of a discussion in D59673.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63130
llvm-svn: 363494
Seems like a logical extension to me - and of interest because it might
help reduce the debug info size of libc++ by applying this attribute to
type traits that have a disproportionate debug info cost compared to the
benefit (& possibly harm/confusion) they cause users.
llvm-svn: 362856
prettyprint
__declspec(nothrow) should work on function pointers as well as function
references, so this changes it to FunctionLike. Additionally,
FunctionLike needed to be modified to permit function references.
Finally, the TypePrinter didn't properly print the NoThrow exception
specifier, so make sure we get that right as well.
llvm-svn: 362435
Swift requires certain classes to be not just initialized lazily on first
use, but actually allocated lazily using information that is only available
at runtime. This is incompatible with ObjC class initialization, or at least
not efficiently compatible, because there is no meaningful class symbol
that can be put in a class-ref variable at load time. This leaves ObjC
code unable to access such classes, which is undesirable.
objc_class_stub says that class references should be resolved by calling
a new ObjC runtime function with a pointer to a new "class stub" structure.
Non-ObjC compilers (like Swift) can simply emit this structure when ObjC
interop is required for a class that cannot be statically allocated,
then apply this attribute to the `@interface` in the generated ObjC header
for the class.
This attribute can be thought of as a generalization of the existing
`objc_runtime_visible` attribute which permits more efficient class
resolution as well as supporting the additon of categories to the class.
Subclassing these classes from ObjC is currently not allowed.
Patch by Slava Pestov!
llvm-svn: 362054
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
We want to make objc_nonlazy_class apply to implementations, but ran into this.
There doesn't seem to be any reason that this isn't supported.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60542
llvm-svn: 358200
This reverts commit r353765. After talking with our c stdlib folks, we decided
to use the existing pass_object_size attribute to implement _FORTIFY_SOURCE
wrappers, like Bionic does (I didn't realize that pass_object_size could be used
for this purpose). Sorry for the flip/flop, and thanks to James Y. Knight for
pointing this out to me.
llvm-svn: 356103
This was sometimes causing clang or llvm-mc to crash, and in other
cases could emit a bogus DWARF line-table header. I did an interim
patch in r352541; this patch should be a cleaner and more complete
fix, and retains the test.
Addresses PR40538.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58750
llvm-svn: 355226
This patch enables the following
1) AMD family 17h "znver2" tune flag (-march, -mcpu).
2) ISAs that are enabled for "znver2" architecture.
3) For the time being, it uses the znver1 scheduler model.
4) Tests are updated.
5) This patch is the clang counterpart to D58343
Reviewers: craig.topper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58344
llvm-svn: 354899
The new __attribute__ ((mig_server_routine)) is going to be used for annotating
Mach Interface Generator (MIG) callback functions as such, so that additional
static analysis could be applied to their implementations. It can also be
applied to regular functions behavior of which is supposed to be identical to
that of a MIG server routine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58365
llvm-svn: 354530
This fixes a regression that was caused by r335084, which reversed
the order that attributes are applied. objc_method_family can change
whether a method is an init method, so the order that these
attributes are applied matters. The commit fixes this by delaying the
init check until after all attributes have been applied.
rdar://47829358
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58152
llvm-svn: 353976
This attribute applies to declarations of C stdlib functions
(sprintf, memcpy...) that have known fortified variants
(__sprintf_chk, __memcpy_chk, ...). When applied, clang will emit
calls to the fortified variant functions instead of calls to the
defaults.
In GCC, this is done by adding gnu_inline-style wrapper functions,
but that doesn't work for us for variadic functions because we don't
support __builtin_va_arg_pack (and have no intention to).
This attribute takes two arguments, the first is 'type' argument
passed through to __builtin_object_size, and the second is a flag
argument that gets passed through to the variadic checking variants.
rdar://47905754
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57918
llvm-svn: 353765
This patch simply teach BPF driver about the new CPU "v3" introduced in
LLVM backend.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
llvm-svn: 353479
A non-lazy class will be initialized eagerly when the Objective-C runtime is
loaded. This is required for certain system classes which have instances allocated in
non-standard ways, such as the classes for blocks and constant strings.
Adding this attribute is essentially equivalent to providing a trivial
+load method but avoids the (fairly small) load-time overheads associated
with defining and calling such a method.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56555
llvm-svn: 353116
This is similar to import_module, but sets the import field name
instead.
By default, the import field name is the same as the C/asm/.o symbol
name. However, there are situations where it's useful to have it be
different. For example, suppose I have a wasm API with a module named
"pwsix" and a field named "read". There's no risk of namespace
collisions with user code at the wasm level because the generic name
"read" is qualified by the module name "pwsix". However in the C/asm/.o
namespaces, the module name is not used, so if I have a global function
named "read", it is intruding on the user's namespace.
With the import_field module, I can declare my function (in libc) to be
"__read", and then set the wasm import module to be "pwsix" and the wasm
import field to be "read". So at the C/asm/.o levels, my symbol is
outside the user namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57602
llvm-svn: 352930
Token pasted by the preprocessor (through ##) have a Spelling pointing to scratch buffer.
As a result they are not recognized at system macro, even though the pasting happened in
a system macro. Fix that by looking into the parent macro if the original lookup finds a
scratch buffer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55782
This effectively fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35268,
llvm-svn: 352838
With commit r351627, LLVM gained the ability to apply (existing) IPO
optimizations on indirections through callbacks, or transitive calls.
The general idea is that we use an abstraction to hide the middle man
and represent the callback call in the context of the initial caller.
It is described in more detail in the commit message of the LLVM patch
r351627, the llvm::AbstractCallSite class description, and the
language reference section on callback-metadata.
This commit enables clang to emit !callback metadata that is
understood by LLVM. It does so in three different cases:
1) For known broker functions declarations that are directly
generated, e.g., __kmpc_fork_call for the OpenMP pragma parallel.
2) For known broker functions that are identified by their name and
source location through the builtin detection, e.g.,
pthread_create from the POSIX thread API.
3) For user annotated functions that carry the "callback(callee, ...)"
attribute. The attribute has to include the name, or index, of
the callback callee and how the passed arguments can be
identified (as many as the callback callee has). See the callback
attribute documentation for detailed information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55483
llvm-svn: 351629
Summary:
This attribute will allow users to opt specific functions out of
speculative load hardening. This compliments the Clang attribute
named speculative_load_hardening. When this attribute or the attribute
speculative_load_hardening is used in combination with the flags
-mno-speculative-load-hardening or -mspeculative-load-hardening,
the function level attribute will override the default during LLVM IR
generation. For example, in the case, where the flag opposes the
function attribute, the function attribute will take precendence.
The sticky inlining behavior of the speculative_load_hardening attribute
may cause a function with the no_speculative_load_hardening attribute
to be tagged with the speculative_load_hardening tag in
subsequent compiler phases which is desired behavior since the
speculative_load_hardening LLVM attribute is designed to be maximally
conservative.
If both attributes are specified for a function, then an error will be
thrown.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54909
llvm-svn: 351565
While building openJDK11u, it seems that some of the code in the
native core libraries make liberal use of integer to pointer
comparisons. We currently have no flag to disabled this warning.
This add such a flag.
Patch by Kader (abdoul-kader keita)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56241
llvm-svn: 351082
When applied to out-parameters, the attributes specify the expected lifetime of the written-into object.
Additionally, introduce OSReturnsRetainedOn(Non)Zero attributes, which
specify that an ownership transfer happens depending on a return code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56292
llvm-svn: 350942
This attribute, called "objc_externally_retained", exposes clang's
notion of pseudo-__strong variables in ARC. Pseudo-strong variables
"borrow" their initializer, meaning that they don't retain/release
it, instead assuming that someone else is keeping their value alive.
If a function is annotated with this attribute, implicitly strong
parameters of that function aren't implicitly retained/released in
the function body, and are implicitly const. This is useful to expose
for performance reasons, most functions don't need the extra safety
of the retain/release, so programmers can opt out as needed.
This attribute can also apply to declarations of local variables,
with similar effect.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55865
llvm-svn: 350422
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
is the same as
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.
This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,
!0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
!1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
!2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
!3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}
defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.
Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.
For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.
Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.
To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.
With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).
Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288
llvm-svn: 348944
Downstream forks that have their own attributes often run into this
test failing when a new attribute is added to clang because the
number of supported attributes no longer match. This is redundant
information for this test, so we can get by without it.
rdar://46288577
llvm-svn: 348218
This moves everything primarily testing the functionality of -ast-dump and -ast-print into their own directory, rather than leaving the tests spread around the testing directory.
llvm-svn: 348017
The addition adds three attributes for communicating ownership,
analogous to existing NS_ and CF_ attributes.
The attributes are meant to be used for communicating ownership of all
objects in XNU (Darwin kernel) and all of the kernel modules.
The ownership model there is very similar, but still different from the
Foundation model, so we think that introducing a new family of
attributes is appropriate.
The addition required a sizeable refactoring of the existing code for
CF_ and NS_ ownership attributes, due to tight coupling and the fact
that differentiating between the types was previously done using a
boolean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54912
llvm-svn: 347947
Summary:
Resubmit this with no changes because I think the build was broken
by a different diff.
-----
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347701
This is skylake-avx512 with the addition of avx512vnni ISA.
Patch by Jianping Chen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54792
llvm-svn: 347682
until I figure out why the build is failing or timing out
***************************
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function
basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
This reverts commit a5b3c232d1e3613f23efbc3960f8e23ea70f2a79.
(r347617)
llvm-svn: 347628
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347617
Leonard Chan