Summary:
v2: Make ReturnsVoid private, so that I can another 8 lines of code and
look more productive.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16034
llvm-svn: 257622
Summary:
Return values can be stored in SGPRs (i32) and VGPRs (f32).
This will be used by functions which expect some bytecode or other binary to
be appended at the end. It allows defining in which registers the return
values will be stored.
v2: don't do this for compute shaders
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16033
llvm-svn: 257621
Summary:
It is off by default, but can be used
with --misched=si
Patch by: Axel Davy
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, nhaehnle
Subscribers: nhaehnle, solenskiner, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11885
llvm-svn: 257609
The global entry point prologue currently assumes that the TOC
associated with a function is less than 2GB away from the function
entry point. This is always true when using the medium or small
code model, but may not be the case when using the large code model.
This patch adds a new variant of the ELFv2 global entry point prologue
that lifts the 2GB restriction when building with -mcmodel=large.
This works by emitting a quadword containing the distance from the
function entry point to its associated TOC immediately before the
entry point, and then using a prologue like:
ld r2,-8(r12)
add r2,r2,r12
Since creation of the entry point prologue is now split across two
separate routines (PPCLinuxAsmPrinter::EmitFunctionEntryLabel emits
the data word, PPCLinuxAsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBodyStart the prolog
code), I've switched to using named labels instead of just temporaries
to indicate the locations of the global and local entry points and the
new TOC offset data word.
These names are provided by new routines in PPCFunctionInfo modeled
after the existing PPCFunctionInfo::getPICOffsetSymbol.
Note that a corresponding change was committed to GCC here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00355.html
Reviewers: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15500
llvm-svn: 257597
Summary:
With the ability to concatenate shader binaries, the limit of 15 no longer
applies.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16031
llvm-svn: 257592
Summary:
This allows Mesa to pass initial SPI_PS_INPUT_ADDR to LLVM.
The register assigns VGPR locations to PS inputs, while the ENA register
determines whether or not they are loaded.
Mesa needs to set some inputs as not-movable, so that a pixel shader prolog
binary appended at the beginning can assume where some inputs are.
v2: Make PSInputAddr private, because there is never enough silly getters
and setters for people to read.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16030
llvm-svn: 257591
Summary: ret.ll will contain a test for this
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16029
llvm-svn: 257590
Make x86 OptimizeLEAs pass remove LEA instruction if there is another LEA
(in the same basic block) which calculates address differing only be a
displacement. Works only for -Oz.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13295
llvm-svn: 257589
AnalyzeBranch on X86 (and, previously, SPARC, which implementation was
copied from X86) tries to modify the branches based on block
layout (e.g. checking isLayoutSuccessor), when AllowModify is true.
The rest of the architectures leave that up to the caller, which can
call InsertBranch, RemoveBranch, and ReverseBranchCondition as
appropriate. That appears to be the preferred way to do it nowadays.
This commit makes SPARC like the rest: replaces AnalyzeBranch with an
implementation cribbed from AArch64, and adds a ReverseBranchCondition
implementation.
Additionally, a test-case has been added (also cribbed from AArch64)
demonstrating that redundant branch sequences no longer get emitted.
E.g., it used to emit code like this:
bne .LBB1_2
nop
ba .LBB1_1
nop
.LBB1_2:
And now emits:
cmp %i0, 42
be .LBB1_1
nop
llvm-svn: 257572
Summary:
BFC instructions are available in ARMv6T2 and above.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16076
llvm-svn: 257546
VMOVs are not strictly speaking cheap, but they are as expensive as a vector
copy (VORR), so we should prefer rematerialization over splitting when it
applies.
rdar://problem/23754176
llvm-svn: 257545
Only non-weighted predicates were handled in PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect. Handle
the weighted predicates as well.
This latent bug was triggered by r255398, because it added use of the
branch-weighted predicates.
While here, switch over an enum instead of an int to get the compiler to enforce
totality in the future.
llvm-svn: 257518
A request has been made to the official registry, but an official value is
not yet available. This patch uses a temporary value in order to support
development. When an official value is recieved, the value of EM_WEBASSEMBLY
will be updated.
llvm-svn: 257517
Refactor .param, .result, .local, and .endfunc, as directives, using the
proper MCTargetStreamer mechanism, rather than fake instructions.
llvm-svn: 257511
This patch changes the way labels are referenced. Instead of referencing the
basic-block label name (eg. .LBB0_0), instructions now just have an immediate
which indicates the depth in the control-flow stack to find a label to jump to.
This makes them much closer to what we expect to have in the binary encoding,
and avoids the problem of basic-block label names not being explicit in the
binary encoding.
Also, it terminates blocks and loops with end_block and end_loop instructions,
rather than basic-block label names, for similar reasons.
This will also fix problems where two constructs appear to have the same label,
because we no longer explicitly use labels, so consumers that need labels will
presumably create their own labels, and presumably they won't reuse labels
when they do.
This patch does make the code a little more awkward to read; as a partial
mitigation, this patch also introduces comments showing where the labels are,
and comments on each branch showing where it's branching to.
llvm-svn: 257505
This is a very limited implementation of DFG-based copy propagation.
It only handles actual COPY instructions (does not handle other equivalents
such as add-immediate with a 0 operand).
The major limitation is that it does not update the DFG: that will be the
change required to make it more robust (hopefully coming up soon).
llvm-svn: 257490
Summary: The result register is the second operand as per the other mt* instructions.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15993
llvm-svn: 257478
Target independent, SSA-based data flow framework for representing
data flow between physical registers.
This commit implements the creation of the actual data flow graph.
llvm-svn: 257477
Summary:
This fixes three bugs, in all of which state is not or incorrecly reset between
objects (i.e. when reusing the same pass manager to create multiple object
files):
1) AttributeSection needs to be reset to nullptr, because otherwise the backend
will try to emit into the old object file's attribute section causing a
segmentation fault.
2) MappingSymbolCounter needs to be reset, otherwise the second object file
will start where the first one left off.
3) The MCStreamer base class resets the Streamer's e_flags settings. Since
EF_ARM_EABI_VER5 is set on streamer creation, we need to set it again
after the MCStreamer was rest.
Also rename Reset (uppser case) to EHReset to avoid confusion with
reset (lower case).
Reviewers: rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15950
llvm-svn: 257473
(64 to 128-bit) matches against the pattern fragment 'vzmovl_v2i64'
(a zero-extended 64-bit load).
However, a change in r248784 teaches the instruction combiner that only
the lower 64 bits of the input to a 128-bit vcvtph2ps are used. This means
the instruction combiner will ordinarily optimize away the upper 64-bit
insertelement instruction in the zero-extension and so we no longer select
the memory-register form. To fix this a new pattern has been added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16067
llvm-svn: 257470
Krzysztof Parzyszek